P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing

Contextual effects abound in the real world. A classic example of this is the tilt illusion that results in a target's orientation appearing repelled from that of a surround. However the opposite effect can also occur (the indirect tilt illusion) and the target's orientation appears shifte...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Isabelle Mareschal, Colin W G Clifford
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2012-10-01
Series:i-Perception
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1068/if723
id doaj-6dff0467920447aaabfc64b1ca6eb18d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6dff0467920447aaabfc64b1ca6eb18d2020-11-25T03:40:30ZengSAGE Publishingi-Perception2041-66952012-10-01310.1068/if72310.1068_if723P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation ProcessingIsabelle Mareschal0Colin W G CliffordUniversity of Sydney, AustraliaContextual effects abound in the real world. A classic example of this is the tilt illusion that results in a target's orientation appearing repelled from that of a surround. However the opposite effect can also occur (the indirect tilt illusion) and the target's orientation appears shifted towards that of the surround. These orientation biases are believed to result from different mechanisms with the indirect TI requiring input from higher cortical areas. We designed a novel reverse correlation technique to investigate this. The stimulus consisted of a concentric annular surround (outer diameter 7.8°) containing a 2 cpd grating that could have one of 12 possible orientations abutting a circular patch (diameter 1.8°) where a vertical 2 cpd grating was presented every 2 s. The surround was refreshed on each frame (11.7 ms) and each orientation had an equal probability of being selected. The observers' ( n = 5) task was to report after each target presentation whether it had appeared tilted clockwise or counterclockwise of a subjective vertical. All observers displayed a strong direct tilt illusion with this novel technique. In the majority of the observers ( n = 4) we also obtain an indirect tilt illusion. Both illusions occur reliably and over a similar time course (roughly ±60 ms around the time of target presentation) despite the lack of conscious access to the surround orientation. These results support the role of a single mechanism underlying orientation biases and refute the need for higher-level conscious processing of the context.https://doi.org/10.1068/if723
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Isabelle Mareschal
Colin W G Clifford
spellingShingle Isabelle Mareschal
Colin W G Clifford
P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
i-Perception
author_facet Isabelle Mareschal
Colin W G Clifford
author_sort Isabelle Mareschal
title P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
title_short P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
title_full P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
title_fullStr P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
title_full_unstemmed P3-13: Dynamics of Unconscious Contextual Effects in Orientation Processing
title_sort p3-13: dynamics of unconscious contextual effects in orientation processing
publisher SAGE Publishing
series i-Perception
issn 2041-6695
publishDate 2012-10-01
description Contextual effects abound in the real world. A classic example of this is the tilt illusion that results in a target's orientation appearing repelled from that of a surround. However the opposite effect can also occur (the indirect tilt illusion) and the target's orientation appears shifted towards that of the surround. These orientation biases are believed to result from different mechanisms with the indirect TI requiring input from higher cortical areas. We designed a novel reverse correlation technique to investigate this. The stimulus consisted of a concentric annular surround (outer diameter 7.8°) containing a 2 cpd grating that could have one of 12 possible orientations abutting a circular patch (diameter 1.8°) where a vertical 2 cpd grating was presented every 2 s. The surround was refreshed on each frame (11.7 ms) and each orientation had an equal probability of being selected. The observers' ( n = 5) task was to report after each target presentation whether it had appeared tilted clockwise or counterclockwise of a subjective vertical. All observers displayed a strong direct tilt illusion with this novel technique. In the majority of the observers ( n = 4) we also obtain an indirect tilt illusion. Both illusions occur reliably and over a similar time course (roughly ±60 ms around the time of target presentation) despite the lack of conscious access to the surround orientation. These results support the role of a single mechanism underlying orientation biases and refute the need for higher-level conscious processing of the context.
url https://doi.org/10.1068/if723
work_keys_str_mv AT isabellemareschal p313dynamicsofunconsciouscontextualeffectsinorientationprocessing
AT colinwgclifford p313dynamicsofunconsciouscontextualeffectsinorientationprocessing
_version_ 1724534348125831168