This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols

Abstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesca Schiavone, Riya Bathia, Krishna Letchemanan, Lindsey Masters, Claire Amos, Anna Bara, Louise Brown, Clare Gilson, Cheryl Pugh, Nafisah Atako, Fleur Hudson, Mahesh Parmar, Ruth Langley, Richard S. Kaplan, Chris Parker, Gert Attard, Noel W. Clarke, Silke Gillessen, Nicholas D. James, Tim Maughan, Matthew R. Sydes, On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-05-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
id doaj-6e07272452b74f78bf38922ab9f8d1a4
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesca Schiavone
Riya Bathia
Krishna Letchemanan
Lindsey Masters
Claire Amos
Anna Bara
Louise Brown
Clare Gilson
Cheryl Pugh
Nafisah Atako
Fleur Hudson
Mahesh Parmar
Ruth Langley
Richard S. Kaplan
Chris Parker
Gert Attard
Noel W. Clarke
Silke Gillessen
Nicholas D. James
Tim Maughan
Matthew R. Sydes
On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group
spellingShingle Francesca Schiavone
Riya Bathia
Krishna Letchemanan
Lindsey Masters
Claire Amos
Anna Bara
Louise Brown
Clare Gilson
Cheryl Pugh
Nafisah Atako
Fleur Hudson
Mahesh Parmar
Ruth Langley
Richard S. Kaplan
Chris Parker
Gert Attard
Noel W. Clarke
Silke Gillessen
Nicholas D. James
Tim Maughan
Matthew R. Sydes
On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
Trials
Adaptive trials
Platform
Multi-arm multi stage
Protocol
Trial conduct
Trial management
author_facet Francesca Schiavone
Riya Bathia
Krishna Letchemanan
Lindsey Masters
Claire Amos
Anna Bara
Louise Brown
Clare Gilson
Cheryl Pugh
Nafisah Atako
Fleur Hudson
Mahesh Parmar
Ruth Langley
Richard S. Kaplan
Chris Parker
Gert Attard
Noel W. Clarke
Silke Gillessen
Nicholas D. James
Tim Maughan
Matthew R. Sydes
On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group
author_sort Francesca Schiavone
title This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
title_short This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
title_full This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
title_fullStr This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
title_full_unstemmed This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
title_sort this is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
publisher BMC
series Trials
issn 1745-6215
publishDate 2019-05-01
description Abstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and (2) early stopping of accrual to individual comparisons that do not show sufficient activity without affecting other active comparisons. Adaptive platform design trials also offer many potential benefits over traditional trials, from faster time to accrual to contemporaneously recruiting multiple research comparisons, added flexibility to focus on more promising research comparisons via pre-planned interim analyses and potentially shorter time to primary results. We share here our experiences from a trial management perspective, highlighting the challenges and successes. Methods We evaluated the operational aspects of making changes to these adaptive platform trials and identified both common and trial-specific challenges. The operational steps and challenges linked to both the addition of new research comparisons and stopping recruitment following pre-planned interim analysis were considered in our evaluation. Results Specific operational challenges in these adaptive platform protocols, additional to those in traditional two-arm trials, were identified. Key lessons are presented describing some of the solutions and considerations over conducting these trials. Careful consideration on the practicality of the protocol structure (modular versus single protocol), the longevity and continuity of trial oversight committees, and having clear clinical and scientific criteria for the addition of new research comparisons were identified as some of the most common challenges. Conclusions Understanding the operational complexities associated with running adaptive platform protocols is paramount for their conduct, adaptive platform trials offer an efficient model to run randomised controlled trials and we are continuing to work to reduce further the effort required from an operational perspective. Trial registration FOCUS4: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN90061546. Registered on 16 October 2013. STAMPEDE: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN78818544. Registered on 2 February 2004.
topic Adaptive trials
Platform
Multi-arm multi stage
Protocol
Trial conduct
Trial management
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8
work_keys_str_mv AT francescaschiavone thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT riyabathia thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT krishnaletchemanan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT lindseymasters thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT claireamos thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT annabara thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT louisebrown thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT claregilson thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT cherylpugh thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT nafisahatako thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT fleurhudson thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT maheshparmar thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT ruthlangley thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT richardskaplan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT chrisparker thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT gertattard thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT noelwclarke thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT silkegillessen thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT nicholasdjames thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT timmaughan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT matthewrsydes thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
AT onbehalfofpastandpresentmembersofthestampedeandfocus4trialmanagementgroup thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols
_version_ 1724775503270772736
spelling doaj-6e07272452b74f78bf38922ab9f8d1a42020-11-25T02:42:04ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-05-0120111310.1186/s13063-019-3216-8This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocolsFrancesca Schiavone0Riya Bathia1Krishna Letchemanan2Lindsey Masters3Claire Amos4Anna Bara5Louise Brown6Clare Gilson7Cheryl Pugh8Nafisah Atako9Fleur Hudson10Mahesh Parmar11Ruth Langley12Richard S. Kaplan13Chris Parker14Gert Attard15Noel W. Clarke16Silke Gillessen17Nicholas D. James18Tim Maughan19Matthew R. Sydes20On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management GroupMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLInstitute of Cancer ResearchUCL Cancer Institute, University College LondonChristie and Royal Salford HospitalDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and the ChristieInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of BirminghamCancer Research UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of OxfordMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLAbstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and (2) early stopping of accrual to individual comparisons that do not show sufficient activity without affecting other active comparisons. Adaptive platform design trials also offer many potential benefits over traditional trials, from faster time to accrual to contemporaneously recruiting multiple research comparisons, added flexibility to focus on more promising research comparisons via pre-planned interim analyses and potentially shorter time to primary results. We share here our experiences from a trial management perspective, highlighting the challenges and successes. Methods We evaluated the operational aspects of making changes to these adaptive platform trials and identified both common and trial-specific challenges. The operational steps and challenges linked to both the addition of new research comparisons and stopping recruitment following pre-planned interim analysis were considered in our evaluation. Results Specific operational challenges in these adaptive platform protocols, additional to those in traditional two-arm trials, were identified. Key lessons are presented describing some of the solutions and considerations over conducting these trials. Careful consideration on the practicality of the protocol structure (modular versus single protocol), the longevity and continuity of trial oversight committees, and having clear clinical and scientific criteria for the addition of new research comparisons were identified as some of the most common challenges. Conclusions Understanding the operational complexities associated with running adaptive platform protocols is paramount for their conduct, adaptive platform trials offer an efficient model to run randomised controlled trials and we are continuing to work to reduce further the effort required from an operational perspective. Trial registration FOCUS4: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN90061546. Registered on 16 October 2013. STAMPEDE: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN78818544. Registered on 2 February 2004.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8Adaptive trialsPlatformMulti-arm multi stageProtocolTrial conductTrial management