This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols
Abstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2019-05-01
|
Series: | Trials |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8 |
id |
doaj-6e07272452b74f78bf38922ab9f8d1a4 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Francesca Schiavone Riya Bathia Krishna Letchemanan Lindsey Masters Claire Amos Anna Bara Louise Brown Clare Gilson Cheryl Pugh Nafisah Atako Fleur Hudson Mahesh Parmar Ruth Langley Richard S. Kaplan Chris Parker Gert Attard Noel W. Clarke Silke Gillessen Nicholas D. James Tim Maughan Matthew R. Sydes On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group |
spellingShingle |
Francesca Schiavone Riya Bathia Krishna Letchemanan Lindsey Masters Claire Amos Anna Bara Louise Brown Clare Gilson Cheryl Pugh Nafisah Atako Fleur Hudson Mahesh Parmar Ruth Langley Richard S. Kaplan Chris Parker Gert Attard Noel W. Clarke Silke Gillessen Nicholas D. James Tim Maughan Matthew R. Sydes On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols Trials Adaptive trials Platform Multi-arm multi stage Protocol Trial conduct Trial management |
author_facet |
Francesca Schiavone Riya Bathia Krishna Letchemanan Lindsey Masters Claire Amos Anna Bara Louise Brown Clare Gilson Cheryl Pugh Nafisah Atako Fleur Hudson Mahesh Parmar Ruth Langley Richard S. Kaplan Chris Parker Gert Attard Noel W. Clarke Silke Gillessen Nicholas D. James Tim Maughan Matthew R. Sydes On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management Group |
author_sort |
Francesca Schiavone |
title |
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
title_short |
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
title_full |
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
title_fullStr |
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
title_full_unstemmed |
This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
title_sort |
this is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocols |
publisher |
BMC |
series |
Trials |
issn |
1745-6215 |
publishDate |
2019-05-01 |
description |
Abstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and (2) early stopping of accrual to individual comparisons that do not show sufficient activity without affecting other active comparisons. Adaptive platform design trials also offer many potential benefits over traditional trials, from faster time to accrual to contemporaneously recruiting multiple research comparisons, added flexibility to focus on more promising research comparisons via pre-planned interim analyses and potentially shorter time to primary results. We share here our experiences from a trial management perspective, highlighting the challenges and successes. Methods We evaluated the operational aspects of making changes to these adaptive platform trials and identified both common and trial-specific challenges. The operational steps and challenges linked to both the addition of new research comparisons and stopping recruitment following pre-planned interim analysis were considered in our evaluation. Results Specific operational challenges in these adaptive platform protocols, additional to those in traditional two-arm trials, were identified. Key lessons are presented describing some of the solutions and considerations over conducting these trials. Careful consideration on the practicality of the protocol structure (modular versus single protocol), the longevity and continuity of trial oversight committees, and having clear clinical and scientific criteria for the addition of new research comparisons were identified as some of the most common challenges. Conclusions Understanding the operational complexities associated with running adaptive platform protocols is paramount for their conduct, adaptive platform trials offer an efficient model to run randomised controlled trials and we are continuing to work to reduce further the effort required from an operational perspective. Trial registration FOCUS4: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN90061546. Registered on 16 October 2013. STAMPEDE: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN78818544. Registered on 2 February 2004. |
topic |
Adaptive trials Platform Multi-arm multi stage Protocol Trial conduct Trial management |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francescaschiavone thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT riyabathia thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT krishnaletchemanan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT lindseymasters thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT claireamos thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT annabara thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT louisebrown thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT claregilson thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT cherylpugh thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT nafisahatako thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT fleurhudson thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT maheshparmar thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT ruthlangley thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT richardskaplan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT chrisparker thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT gertattard thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT noelwclarke thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT silkegillessen thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT nicholasdjames thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT timmaughan thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT matthewrsydes thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols AT onbehalfofpastandpresentmembersofthestampedeandfocus4trialmanagementgroup thisisaplatformalterationatrialmanagementperspectiveontheoperationalaspectsofadaptiveandplatformandumbrellaprotocols |
_version_ |
1724775503270772736 |
spelling |
doaj-6e07272452b74f78bf38922ab9f8d1a42020-11-25T02:42:04ZengBMCTrials1745-62152019-05-0120111310.1186/s13063-019-3216-8This is a platform alteration: a trial management perspective on the operational aspects of adaptive and platform and umbrella protocolsFrancesca Schiavone0Riya Bathia1Krishna Letchemanan2Lindsey Masters3Claire Amos4Anna Bara5Louise Brown6Clare Gilson7Cheryl Pugh8Nafisah Atako9Fleur Hudson10Mahesh Parmar11Ruth Langley12Richard S. Kaplan13Chris Parker14Gert Attard15Noel W. Clarke16Silke Gillessen17Nicholas D. James18Tim Maughan19Matthew R. Sydes20On behalf of past and present members of the STAMPEDE and FOCUS4 Trial Management GroupMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLInstitute of Cancer ResearchUCL Cancer Institute, University College LondonChristie and Royal Salford HospitalDivision of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and the ChristieInstitute of Cancer and Genomic Sciences, University of BirminghamCancer Research UK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, University of OxfordMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, Institute of Clinical Trials and Methodology, UCLAbstract Background There are limited research and literature on the trial management challenges encountered in running adaptive platform trials. This trial design allows both (1) the seamless addition of new research comparisons when compelling clinical and scientific research questions emerge, and (2) early stopping of accrual to individual comparisons that do not show sufficient activity without affecting other active comparisons. Adaptive platform design trials also offer many potential benefits over traditional trials, from faster time to accrual to contemporaneously recruiting multiple research comparisons, added flexibility to focus on more promising research comparisons via pre-planned interim analyses and potentially shorter time to primary results. We share here our experiences from a trial management perspective, highlighting the challenges and successes. Methods We evaluated the operational aspects of making changes to these adaptive platform trials and identified both common and trial-specific challenges. The operational steps and challenges linked to both the addition of new research comparisons and stopping recruitment following pre-planned interim analysis were considered in our evaluation. Results Specific operational challenges in these adaptive platform protocols, additional to those in traditional two-arm trials, were identified. Key lessons are presented describing some of the solutions and considerations over conducting these trials. Careful consideration on the practicality of the protocol structure (modular versus single protocol), the longevity and continuity of trial oversight committees, and having clear clinical and scientific criteria for the addition of new research comparisons were identified as some of the most common challenges. Conclusions Understanding the operational complexities associated with running adaptive platform protocols is paramount for their conduct, adaptive platform trials offer an efficient model to run randomised controlled trials and we are continuing to work to reduce further the effort required from an operational perspective. Trial registration FOCUS4: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN90061546. Registered on 16 October 2013. STAMPEDE: ISRCTN Registry, ISRCTN78818544. Registered on 2 February 2004.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-019-3216-8Adaptive trialsPlatformMulti-arm multi stageProtocolTrial conductTrial management |