Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity
Strategic decision-making theories suggest that organizations that combine rational and incremental strategy implementation styles are likely to perform better than those that emphasize a single style. To assess whether these arguments apply to the public sector; we explore the strategy implementati...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Administrative Sciences |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/7/1/4 |
id |
doaj-6e187d9855db4e8ea9ff77aaf04bf546 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6e187d9855db4e8ea9ff77aaf04bf5462020-11-24T20:42:03ZengMDPI AGAdministrative Sciences2076-33872017-02-0171410.3390/admsci7010004admsci7010004Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and EquityRhys Andrews0Malcolm J. Beynon1Elif Genc2Cardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UKCardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UKCardiff Business School, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3EU, UKStrategic decision-making theories suggest that organizations that combine rational and incremental strategy implementation styles are likely to perform better than those that emphasize a single style. To assess whether these arguments apply to the public sector; we explore the strategy implementation style and perceived service effectiveness, efficiency and equity of Turkish municipal government departments. Using fuzzy cluster analysis, we identify four distinctive though inter-related styles of strategy implementation in our sample organizations: logical-incremental; mostly rational; mostly incremental; and no clear approach. A logical-incremental and mostly rational style of implementation are associated with better effectiveness, efficiency and equity; with the absence of an implementation style associated with worse performance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed.http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/7/1/4strategyimplementationperformancepublic sectorquantitative analysisfuzzy clustering |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Rhys Andrews Malcolm J. Beynon Elif Genc |
spellingShingle |
Rhys Andrews Malcolm J. Beynon Elif Genc Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity Administrative Sciences strategy implementation performance public sector quantitative analysis fuzzy clustering |
author_facet |
Rhys Andrews Malcolm J. Beynon Elif Genc |
author_sort |
Rhys Andrews |
title |
Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity |
title_short |
Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity |
title_full |
Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity |
title_fullStr |
Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity |
title_full_unstemmed |
Strategy Implementation Style and Public Service Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity |
title_sort |
strategy implementation style and public service effectiveness, efficiency, and equity |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Administrative Sciences |
issn |
2076-3387 |
publishDate |
2017-02-01 |
description |
Strategic decision-making theories suggest that organizations that combine rational and incremental strategy implementation styles are likely to perform better than those that emphasize a single style. To assess whether these arguments apply to the public sector; we explore the strategy implementation style and perceived service effectiveness, efficiency and equity of Turkish municipal government departments. Using fuzzy cluster analysis, we identify four distinctive though inter-related styles of strategy implementation in our sample organizations: logical-incremental; mostly rational; mostly incremental; and no clear approach. A logical-incremental and mostly rational style of implementation are associated with better effectiveness, efficiency and equity; with the absence of an implementation style associated with worse performance. Theoretical and practical implications are discussed. |
topic |
strategy implementation performance public sector quantitative analysis fuzzy clustering |
url |
http://www.mdpi.com/2076-3387/7/1/4 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT rhysandrews strategyimplementationstyleandpublicserviceeffectivenessefficiencyandequity AT malcolmjbeynon strategyimplementationstyleandpublicserviceeffectivenessefficiencyandequity AT elifgenc strategyimplementationstyleandpublicserviceeffectivenessefficiencyandequity |
_version_ |
1716823406924529664 |