Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis

Abstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-it...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Fredrik Hieronymus, Pernille Kølbæk, Christoph U. Correll, Søren D. Østergaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Publishing Group 2021-08-01
Series:npj Schizophrenia
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
id doaj-6e2551eb683541798116ff0d4547bbfa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e2551eb683541798116ff0d4547bbfa2021-08-29T11:18:39ZengNature Publishing Groupnpj Schizophrenia2334-265X2021-08-017111010.1038/s41537-021-00168-xAntipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysisFredrik Hieronymus0Pernille Kølbæk1Christoph U. Correll2Søren D. Østergaard3Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityDivision of Psychiatry Research, The Zucker Hillside HospitalDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus UniversityAbstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) using a large collection of patient-level data (n = 6685) from randomized controlled trials of risperidone and paliperidone. When analyzing the data by study, we found no material difference in mean effect sizes (ES) between the two measures (PANSS-30 ES = 0.45, PANSS-6 ES = 0.44; p = 0.642). Stratifying the pooled population according to several putative effect moderators (e.g., age, formulation, dose, or diagnosis) generally yielded no meaningful ES differences between the two measures. Similarly, early improvement (≥20% improvement at week 1) on the PANSS-6 predicted subsequent response (≥40% improvement at endpoint) as well as the analog prediction using PANSS-30. Finally, cross-sectional symptom remission assessed via the PANSS-6 showed very good agreement (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98%) with cross-sectional symptom remission defined by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
spellingShingle Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
npj Schizophrenia
author_facet Fredrik Hieronymus
Pernille Kølbæk
Christoph U. Correll
Søren D. Østergaard
author_sort Fredrik Hieronymus
title Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_short Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_full Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_fullStr Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_full_unstemmed Antipsychotic-placebo separation on the PANSS-6 subscale as compared to the PANSS-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
title_sort antipsychotic-placebo separation on the panss-6 subscale as compared to the panss-30: a pooled participant-level analysis
publisher Nature Publishing Group
series npj Schizophrenia
issn 2334-265X
publishDate 2021-08-01
description Abstract In order for measurement-based care to be implemented, there is a need for brief rating instruments that can be administered in a short amount of time, but that are still sufficiently informative. Here, we assessed the drug–placebo sensitivity of the six-item subscale (PANSS-6) of the 30-item Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS-30) using a large collection of patient-level data (n = 6685) from randomized controlled trials of risperidone and paliperidone. When analyzing the data by study, we found no material difference in mean effect sizes (ES) between the two measures (PANSS-30 ES = 0.45, PANSS-6 ES = 0.44; p = 0.642). Stratifying the pooled population according to several putative effect moderators (e.g., age, formulation, dose, or diagnosis) generally yielded no meaningful ES differences between the two measures. Similarly, early improvement (≥20% improvement at week 1) on the PANSS-6 predicted subsequent response (≥40% improvement at endpoint) as well as the analog prediction using PANSS-30. Finally, cross-sectional symptom remission assessed via the PANSS-6 showed very good agreement (sensitivity = 100%, specificity = 98%) with cross-sectional symptom remission defined by the Remission in Schizophrenia Working Group.
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41537-021-00168-x
work_keys_str_mv AT fredrikhieronymus antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT pernillekølbæk antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT christophucorrell antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
AT sørendøstergaard antipsychoticplaceboseparationonthepanss6subscaleascomparedtothepanss30apooledparticipantlevelanalysis
_version_ 1721186932758675456