Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work

Incentive pay programs have become panacea for a multitude of educational challenges. When aimed at teachers the assumption is that rewards entice them to work in particular ways or particular schools. However, the assumption is based on an economic formula that does not take into consideration the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sarah A. Robert
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arizona State University 2013-04-01
Series:Education Policy Analysis Archives
Subjects:
Online Access:https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1128
id doaj-6e43206b51154d75a670959f300796ee
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e43206b51154d75a670959f300796ee2020-11-25T02:32:05ZengArizona State UniversityEducation Policy Analysis Archives1068-23412013-04-0121010.14507/epaa.v21n31.20131117Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at WorkSarah A. Robert0University at Buffalo (SUNY)Incentive pay programs have become panacea for a multitude of educational challenges. When aimed at teachers the assumption is that rewards entice them to work in particular ways or particular schools. However, the assumption is based on an economic formula that does not take into consideration the gendered nature of policy processes. This study examined ethnographically 10 teachers’ decision-making processes regarding whether to take up The Rural Program [La Ruralidad] in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, which rewarded qualified educators with bonus pay to work in hard-to-staff schools, to address the question: How does gender mediate teachers’ decision-making process to take up an incentive reward? I isolate three conditions: safety, transportation, and community, to show how gendered relations, identities, and roles incentivize teachers. I argue that masculinities and femininities mediated teachers’ approach to taking up incentives. Rather than a simplistic, one-time-only decision, the study shows an on-going policy process that involves women and men in “rational economic decision making” mired by gender.https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1128incentivesgendered organizationsteachers’ workpolicyArgentinateachersteacher distributionmasculinityfemininity
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Sarah A. Robert
spellingShingle Sarah A. Robert
Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
Education Policy Analysis Archives
incentives
gendered organizations
teachers’ work
policy
Argentina
teachers
teacher distribution
masculinity
femininity
author_facet Sarah A. Robert
author_sort Sarah A. Robert
title Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
title_short Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
title_full Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
title_fullStr Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
title_full_unstemmed Incentives, Teachers, and Gender at Work
title_sort incentives, teachers, and gender at work
publisher Arizona State University
series Education Policy Analysis Archives
issn 1068-2341
publishDate 2013-04-01
description Incentive pay programs have become panacea for a multitude of educational challenges. When aimed at teachers the assumption is that rewards entice them to work in particular ways or particular schools. However, the assumption is based on an economic formula that does not take into consideration the gendered nature of policy processes. This study examined ethnographically 10 teachers’ decision-making processes regarding whether to take up The Rural Program [La Ruralidad] in the Province of Buenos Aires, Argentina, which rewarded qualified educators with bonus pay to work in hard-to-staff schools, to address the question: How does gender mediate teachers’ decision-making process to take up an incentive reward? I isolate three conditions: safety, transportation, and community, to show how gendered relations, identities, and roles incentivize teachers. I argue that masculinities and femininities mediated teachers’ approach to taking up incentives. Rather than a simplistic, one-time-only decision, the study shows an on-going policy process that involves women and men in “rational economic decision making” mired by gender.
topic incentives
gendered organizations
teachers’ work
policy
Argentina
teachers
teacher distribution
masculinity
femininity
url https://epaa.asu.edu/ojs/article/view/1128
work_keys_str_mv AT saraharobert incentivesteachersandgenderatwork
_version_ 1724821582853963776