Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling

Odour and odorous compound measurements depend on the first analytical step: the sampling. This first step could be considered as the most important because the global results are dependent on sampling and analytical procedures but the second part (analysis) is globally more controlled. As example,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: J.M. Guillot
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: AIDIC Servizi S.r.l. 2012-09-01
Series:Chemical Engineering Transactions
Online Access:https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6989
id doaj-6e688969f8734e4c8c2040f9a0b7ab1f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6e688969f8734e4c8c2040f9a0b7ab1f2021-02-22T21:06:04ZengAIDIC Servizi S.r.l.Chemical Engineering Transactions2283-92162012-09-013010.3303/CET1230050Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to SamplingJ.M. GuillotOdour and odorous compound measurements depend on the first analytical step: the sampling. This first step could be considered as the most important because the global results are dependent on sampling and analytical procedures but the second part (analysis) is globally more controlled. As example, olfactometric measurement procedures are well described by EN 13725 standard. But, if panel selection and all smelling parts allow limiting uncertainty for the dilution to threshold measurement, the sampling part is not as well described. Because of several approaches on sampling especially sampling from area sources, a lot of variations can be obtained by this step. Typically, several experiments on area sources have shown that a factor 10, 100 or more can be attributed to the sampling step. In such a case, the uncertainty of the olfactometric part is negligible comparatively to the sampling part. That’s why, it is important to keep in mind that hoods or flux chambers as devices to sample on an active or a passive area respectively must be considered with strict procedures. Even if a lot of teams follow rigorously their own procedure or a regional or a national standard, the lack of international standard on this point is still a problem. Some results cannot be compared with others due to great differences on sampling. The problem could be increased by the sample collection and storage in bags. A lot of studies showed that storage of some compounds or odours are very problematic (losses) and therefore can lead to wrong results. Of course, limitation of time storage can minimize such an impact but it’s important to consider this potential problem by taking some warranties. The present paper gives an overview on the main drawbacks linked to sampling and that affect the global response of odour measurement.https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6989
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author J.M. Guillot
spellingShingle J.M. Guillot
Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
Chemical Engineering Transactions
author_facet J.M. Guillot
author_sort J.M. Guillot
title Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
title_short Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
title_full Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
title_fullStr Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
title_full_unstemmed Odour Measurement: Focus on Main Remaining Limits Due to Sampling
title_sort odour measurement: focus on main remaining limits due to sampling
publisher AIDIC Servizi S.r.l.
series Chemical Engineering Transactions
issn 2283-9216
publishDate 2012-09-01
description Odour and odorous compound measurements depend on the first analytical step: the sampling. This first step could be considered as the most important because the global results are dependent on sampling and analytical procedures but the second part (analysis) is globally more controlled. As example, olfactometric measurement procedures are well described by EN 13725 standard. But, if panel selection and all smelling parts allow limiting uncertainty for the dilution to threshold measurement, the sampling part is not as well described. Because of several approaches on sampling especially sampling from area sources, a lot of variations can be obtained by this step. Typically, several experiments on area sources have shown that a factor 10, 100 or more can be attributed to the sampling step. In such a case, the uncertainty of the olfactometric part is negligible comparatively to the sampling part. That’s why, it is important to keep in mind that hoods or flux chambers as devices to sample on an active or a passive area respectively must be considered with strict procedures. Even if a lot of teams follow rigorously their own procedure or a regional or a national standard, the lack of international standard on this point is still a problem. Some results cannot be compared with others due to great differences on sampling. The problem could be increased by the sample collection and storage in bags. A lot of studies showed that storage of some compounds or odours are very problematic (losses) and therefore can lead to wrong results. Of course, limitation of time storage can minimize such an impact but it’s important to consider this potential problem by taking some warranties. The present paper gives an overview on the main drawbacks linked to sampling and that affect the global response of odour measurement.
url https://www.cetjournal.it/index.php/cet/article/view/6989
work_keys_str_mv AT jmguillot odourmeasurementfocusonmainremaininglimitsduetosampling
_version_ 1724256138255400960