Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy, Safety and Haemostatic Parameters of Enoxaparin and Fondaparinux in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease

• Main Authors: Sanjay Shah, Vijay Khajuria, Vishal R. Tandon, Zahid H.Gillani, Mohan Lal
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: JCDR Research and Publications Private Limited 2014-01-01
• Series: Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research
• Subjects: anticoagulants; low molecular weight heparin; enoxaparin; fondaparinux
• Online Access: https://jcdr.net/articles/PDF/3908/10-6359_E(C)_F(T)_PF1(MH)_PFA(H)_PFA(Ak)_PF2(RKH).pdf

Aim: To compare the safety and efficacy of Enoxaparin (EX) and Fondaparinux (FD) in patients with Unstable Coronary Artery Disease (UCAD). Materials and Methods: A prospective, open label, randomized comparative study was designed to study the comparative efficacy and safety of EX and FD in UCAD patients. Recovery, recurrence, major and minor bleeding and biochemical investigations were evaluated and compared among two arms. Results: The baseline demographic characteristics were similar in both groups, with mean age of 56.05 and 56.05 years in EX and FD group respectively. Recovery was equal in two arms. Recurrent MI or angina was seen numerically more in EX group, but it did not statistically vary from that in the FD group. Incidence of haemorrhage was similar in both groups at 9 days, but at 30 days, EX showed a higher incidence (p<0.05). Deaths were prevented in both the treatment arms. Bleeding parameters such as BT, CT and platelet count were not altered in both groups. Conclusion: FD appeared to be better than EX in efficacy, as was indicated by a numerically more decrease in recurrence of angina or MI. FD regimen group also had better safety profile, as there was no incidence of haemorrhage at 30 days Therefore, we conclude that FD is an attractive option than EX in UCAD patients.