Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more
We use simulations to investigate the effect of sampling frequency on common dependent variables in eye-tracking. We identify two large groups of measures that behave differently, but consistently. The effect of sampling frequency on these two groups of measures are explored and simulations are perf...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Bern Open Publishing
2010-09-01
|
Series: | Journal of Eye Movement Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2300 |
id |
doaj-6f00d342ce8f4d9fba483c5242df15f3 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6f00d342ce8f4d9fba483c5242df15f32021-05-28T13:34:40ZengBern Open PublishingJournal of Eye Movement Research1995-86922010-09-013310.16910/jemr.3.3.6Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and moreRichard Andersson0Marcus Nyström1Kenneth Holmqvist2Lund UniversityLund UniversityLund UniversityWe use simulations to investigate the effect of sampling frequency on common dependent variables in eye-tracking. We identify two large groups of measures that behave differently, but consistently. The effect of sampling frequency on these two groups of measures are explored and simulations are performed to estimate how much data are required to overcome the uncertainty of a limited sampling frequency. Both simulated and real data are used to estimate the temporal uncertainty of data produced by low sampling frequencies. The aim is to provide easy-to-use heuristics for researchers using eye-tracking. For example, we show how to compensate the uncertainty of a low sampling frequency with more data and postexperiment adjustments of measures. These findings have implications primarily for researchers using naturalistic setups where sampling frequencies typically are low.https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2300eye tracking measuressaccadic latencytemporal sampling errorone point measurestwo point measuresvalidity |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Richard Andersson Marcus Nyström Kenneth Holmqvist |
spellingShingle |
Richard Andersson Marcus Nyström Kenneth Holmqvist Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more Journal of Eye Movement Research eye tracking measures saccadic latency temporal sampling error one point measures two point measures validity |
author_facet |
Richard Andersson Marcus Nyström Kenneth Holmqvist |
author_sort |
Richard Andersson |
title |
Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
title_short |
Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
title_full |
Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
title_fullStr |
Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
title_sort |
sampling frequency and eye-tracking measures: how speed affects durations, latencies, and more |
publisher |
Bern Open Publishing |
series |
Journal of Eye Movement Research |
issn |
1995-8692 |
publishDate |
2010-09-01 |
description |
We use simulations to investigate the effect of sampling frequency on common dependent variables in eye-tracking. We identify two large groups of measures that behave differently, but consistently. The effect of sampling frequency on these two groups of measures are explored and simulations are performed to estimate how much data are required to overcome the uncertainty of a limited sampling frequency. Both simulated and real data are used to estimate the temporal uncertainty of data produced by low sampling frequencies. The aim is to provide easy-to-use heuristics for researchers using eye-tracking. For example, we show how to compensate the uncertainty of a low sampling frequency with more data and postexperiment adjustments of measures. These findings have implications primarily for researchers using naturalistic setups where sampling frequencies typically are low. |
topic |
eye tracking measures saccadic latency temporal sampling error one point measures two point measures validity |
url |
https://bop.unibe.ch/JEMR/article/view/2300 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT richardandersson samplingfrequencyandeyetrackingmeasureshowspeedaffectsdurationslatenciesandmore AT marcusnystrom samplingfrequencyandeyetrackingmeasureshowspeedaffectsdurationslatenciesandmore AT kennethholmqvist samplingfrequencyandeyetrackingmeasureshowspeedaffectsdurationslatenciesandmore |
_version_ |
1721423690467377152 |