Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model

The aim of the article is to analyze the existing practices of corruption in higher education and their impact on its quality index as well as develop recommendations on their overcoming. Game methods to analyze the corrupt interaction in the process of getting education are proposed. There ident...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Skrypnyk Andrii V., Oborska Inna S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PH "INZHEK" 2016-11-01
Series:Problemi Ekonomiki
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2016-4_0-pages-273_278.pdf
id doaj-6f8b5fab610e4a3494872f2ee6e505aa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6f8b5fab610e4a3494872f2ee6e505aa2020-11-25T01:10:53ZengPH "INZHEK"Problemi Ekonomiki2222-07122311-11862016-11-014273278Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game ModelSkrypnyk Andrii V.0Oborska Inna S. 1Doctor of Science (Economics), Professor, Head of the Departmentof Economic Cybernetics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of UkraineAssistant of the Department of Economic Cybernetics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of UkraineThe aim of the article is to analyze the existing practices of corruption in higher education and their impact on its quality index as well as develop recommendations on their overcoming. Game methods to analyze the corrupt interaction in the process of getting education are proposed. There identified two categories of lecturers taking bribes: professional bribe-takers and amateurs. It is emphasized that the existence of professionals is only possible under conditions of systemic corruption when part of the risk is passed on to the university administration. The activity of amateurs is analyzed using gaming technologies. The payoff matrices of the student and the teacher are built, the latter includes the likelihood of detection and possible punishment for corruption. It is shown that under current conditions there is saddle point when both the student and the teacher use illegal strategies. The transition to a mixed strategy is possible only in case of a significant increase in the probability of detecting acts of corruption on the part of the teacher or the increase of the size of punishment for corruption. Significant improvements are possible in the case when the population will change views on the effectiveness of knowledge as a source of human capital.http://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2016-4_0-pages-273_278.pdfCorruption Perceptions Index (CPI)higher educationhuman and administrative capitalsystemic and non-systemic corruptionbimatrix gamepayoff matrix
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Skrypnyk Andrii V.
Oborska Inna S.
spellingShingle Skrypnyk Andrii V.
Oborska Inna S.
Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
Problemi Ekonomiki
Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
higher education
human and administrative capital
systemic and non-systemic corruption
bimatrix game
payoff matrix
author_facet Skrypnyk Andrii V.
Oborska Inna S.
author_sort Skrypnyk Andrii V.
title Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
title_short Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
title_full Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
title_fullStr Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
title_full_unstemmed Systemic and Non-Systemic Corruption in Education: the Game Model
title_sort systemic and non-systemic corruption in education: the game model
publisher PH "INZHEK"
series Problemi Ekonomiki
issn 2222-0712
2311-1186
publishDate 2016-11-01
description The aim of the article is to analyze the existing practices of corruption in higher education and their impact on its quality index as well as develop recommendations on their overcoming. Game methods to analyze the corrupt interaction in the process of getting education are proposed. There identified two categories of lecturers taking bribes: professional bribe-takers and amateurs. It is emphasized that the existence of professionals is only possible under conditions of systemic corruption when part of the risk is passed on to the university administration. The activity of amateurs is analyzed using gaming technologies. The payoff matrices of the student and the teacher are built, the latter includes the likelihood of detection and possible punishment for corruption. It is shown that under current conditions there is saddle point when both the student and the teacher use illegal strategies. The transition to a mixed strategy is possible only in case of a significant increase in the probability of detecting acts of corruption on the part of the teacher or the increase of the size of punishment for corruption. Significant improvements are possible in the case when the population will change views on the effectiveness of knowledge as a source of human capital.
topic Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI)
higher education
human and administrative capital
systemic and non-systemic corruption
bimatrix game
payoff matrix
url http://www.problecon.com/export_pdf/problems-of-economy-2016-4_0-pages-273_278.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT skrypnykandriiv systemicandnonsystemiccorruptionineducationthegamemodel
AT oborskainnas systemicandnonsystemiccorruptionineducationthegamemodel
_version_ 1725173676326780928