Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation

In spite of over a century of research on cortical circuits, it is still unknown how many classes of cortical neurons exist. Neuronal classification has been a difficult problem because it is unclear what a neuronal cell class actually is and what are the best characteristics are to define them. Rec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberto eSantana, Laura eMcGarry, Concha eBielza, Pedro eLarrañaga, Rafael eYuste
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2013.00185/full
id doaj-6fd4ce84eb794f76ad99eeb5dc35d0f0
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6fd4ce84eb794f76ad99eeb5dc35d0f02020-11-24T22:59:52ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neural Circuits1662-51102013-12-01710.3389/fncir.2013.0018554149Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagationRoberto eSantana0Laura eMcGarry1Concha eBielza2Pedro eLarrañaga3Rafael eYuste4UPMColumbia UniversityUPMUPMColumbia UniversityIn spite of over a century of research on cortical circuits, it is still unknown how many classes of cortical neurons exist. Neuronal classification has been a difficult problem because it is unclear what a neuronal cell class actually is and what are the best characteristics are to define them. Recently, unsupervised classifications using cluster analysis based on morphological, physiological or molecular characteristics, when applied to selected datasets, have provided quantitative and unbiased identification of distinct neuronal subtypes. However, better and more robust classification methods are needed for increasingly complex and larger datasets. We explored the use of affinity propagation, a recently developed unsupervised classification algorithm imported from machine learning, which gives a representative example or exemplar for each cluster. As a case study, we applied affinity propagation to a test dataset of 337 interneurons belonging to four subtypes, previously identified based on morphological and physiological characteristics. We found that affinity propagation correctly classified most of the neurons in a blind, non-supervised manner. In fact, using a combined anatomical/physiological dataset, our algorithm differentiated parvalbumin from somatostatin interneurons in 49 out of 50 cases. Affinity propagation could therefore be used in future studies to validly classify neurons, as a first step to help reverse engineer neural circuits.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2013.00185/fullInterneuronsGABACortexcell typesaffinity propagation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roberto eSantana
Laura eMcGarry
Concha eBielza
Pedro eLarrañaga
Rafael eYuste
spellingShingle Roberto eSantana
Laura eMcGarry
Concha eBielza
Pedro eLarrañaga
Rafael eYuste
Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
Frontiers in Neural Circuits
Interneurons
GABA
Cortex
cell types
affinity propagation
author_facet Roberto eSantana
Laura eMcGarry
Concha eBielza
Pedro eLarrañaga
Rafael eYuste
author_sort Roberto eSantana
title Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
title_short Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
title_full Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
title_fullStr Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
title_full_unstemmed Classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
title_sort classification of neocortical interneurons using affinity propagation
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Neural Circuits
issn 1662-5110
publishDate 2013-12-01
description In spite of over a century of research on cortical circuits, it is still unknown how many classes of cortical neurons exist. Neuronal classification has been a difficult problem because it is unclear what a neuronal cell class actually is and what are the best characteristics are to define them. Recently, unsupervised classifications using cluster analysis based on morphological, physiological or molecular characteristics, when applied to selected datasets, have provided quantitative and unbiased identification of distinct neuronal subtypes. However, better and more robust classification methods are needed for increasingly complex and larger datasets. We explored the use of affinity propagation, a recently developed unsupervised classification algorithm imported from machine learning, which gives a representative example or exemplar for each cluster. As a case study, we applied affinity propagation to a test dataset of 337 interneurons belonging to four subtypes, previously identified based on morphological and physiological characteristics. We found that affinity propagation correctly classified most of the neurons in a blind, non-supervised manner. In fact, using a combined anatomical/physiological dataset, our algorithm differentiated parvalbumin from somatostatin interneurons in 49 out of 50 cases. Affinity propagation could therefore be used in future studies to validly classify neurons, as a first step to help reverse engineer neural circuits.
topic Interneurons
GABA
Cortex
cell types
affinity propagation
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fncir.2013.00185/full
work_keys_str_mv AT robertoesantana classificationofneocorticalinterneuronsusingaffinitypropagation
AT lauraemcgarry classificationofneocorticalinterneuronsusingaffinitypropagation
AT conchaebielza classificationofneocorticalinterneuronsusingaffinitypropagation
AT pedroelarranaga classificationofneocorticalinterneuronsusingaffinitypropagation
AT rafaeleyuste classificationofneocorticalinterneuronsusingaffinitypropagation
_version_ 1725643645417160704