Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patient...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
PAGEPress Publications
2010-12-01
|
Series: | Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401 |
id |
doaj-6fe0e00e11244df098ca001936dee430 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-6fe0e00e11244df098ca001936dee4302020-11-25T02:19:41ZengPAGEPress PublicationsMultidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine2049-69582010-12-015640140810.1186/2049-6958-5-6-401Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trialMendes de Oliveira Júlio CStudart Leitão Filho Fernando SMalosa Sampaio Luciana MNegrinho de Oliveira Ana CHirata RaquelCosta DirceuDonner Claudio Fde Oliveira Luís VF<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patients, families and society. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary program that integrates components of exercise training, education, nutritional support, psychological support and self-care, resulting in an improvement in dyspnea, fatigue and quality of life. Despite its proven effectiveness and the strong scientific recommendations for its routine use in the care of COPD, PR is generally underutilized and strategies for increasing access to PR are needed. Home-based self-monitored pulmonary rehabilitation is an alternative to outpatient rehabilitation. In the present study, patients with mild, moderate and severe COPD submitted to either an outpatient or at-home PR program for 12 weeks were analyzed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into three distinct groups: an outpatient group who performed all activities at the clinic, a home-based group who performed the activities at home and a control group. PR consisted of a combination of aerobic exercises and strengthening of upper and lower limbs 3 times a week for 12 weeks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a significant difference in the distance covered on the six-minute walk test (p < 0.05) and BODE index (p < 0.001) in the outpatient and at-home groups after participating in the rehabilitation program compared to baseline.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A home-based self-monitoring pulmonary rehabilitation program is as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and is a valid alternative for the management of patients with COPD.</p> http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401COPDhome-based pulmonary rehabilitationpulmonary rehabilitation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S Malosa Sampaio Luciana M Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C Hirata Raquel Costa Dirceu Donner Claudio F de Oliveira Luís VF |
spellingShingle |
Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S Malosa Sampaio Luciana M Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C Hirata Raquel Costa Dirceu Donner Claudio F de Oliveira Luís VF Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine COPD home-based pulmonary rehabilitation pulmonary rehabilitation |
author_facet |
Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S Malosa Sampaio Luciana M Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C Hirata Raquel Costa Dirceu Donner Claudio F de Oliveira Luís VF |
author_sort |
Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C |
title |
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short |
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full |
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr |
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed |
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort |
outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in copd: a randomized controlled trial |
publisher |
PAGEPress Publications |
series |
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine |
issn |
2049-6958 |
publishDate |
2010-12-01 |
description |
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patients, families and society. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary program that integrates components of exercise training, education, nutritional support, psychological support and self-care, resulting in an improvement in dyspnea, fatigue and quality of life. Despite its proven effectiveness and the strong scientific recommendations for its routine use in the care of COPD, PR is generally underutilized and strategies for increasing access to PR are needed. Home-based self-monitored pulmonary rehabilitation is an alternative to outpatient rehabilitation. In the present study, patients with mild, moderate and severe COPD submitted to either an outpatient or at-home PR program for 12 weeks were analyzed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into three distinct groups: an outpatient group who performed all activities at the clinic, a home-based group who performed the activities at home and a control group. PR consisted of a combination of aerobic exercises and strengthening of upper and lower limbs 3 times a week for 12 weeks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a significant difference in the distance covered on the six-minute walk test (p < 0.05) and BODE index (p < 0.001) in the outpatient and at-home groups after participating in the rehabilitation program compared to baseline.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A home-based self-monitoring pulmonary rehabilitation program is as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and is a valid alternative for the management of patients with COPD.</p> |
topic |
COPD home-based pulmonary rehabilitation pulmonary rehabilitation |
url |
http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mendesdeoliveirajulioc outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT studartleitaofilhofernandos outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT malosasampaiolucianam outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT negrinhodeoliveiraanac outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hirataraquel outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT costadirceu outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT donnerclaudiof outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT deoliveiraluisvf outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial |
_version_ |
1724875022876540928 |