Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patient...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C, Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S, Malosa Sampaio Luciana M, Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C, Hirata Raquel, Costa Dirceu, Donner Claudio F, de Oliveira Luís VF
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2010-12-01
Series:Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401
id doaj-6fe0e00e11244df098ca001936dee430
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6fe0e00e11244df098ca001936dee4302020-11-25T02:19:41ZengPAGEPress PublicationsMultidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine2049-69582010-12-015640140810.1186/2049-6958-5-6-401Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trialMendes de Oliveira Júlio CStudart Leitão Filho Fernando SMalosa Sampaio Luciana MNegrinho de Oliveira Ana CHirata RaquelCosta DirceuDonner Claudio Fde Oliveira Luís VF<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patients, families and society. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary program that integrates components of exercise training, education, nutritional support, psychological support and self-care, resulting in an improvement in dyspnea, fatigue and quality of life. Despite its proven effectiveness and the strong scientific recommendations for its routine use in the care of COPD, PR is generally underutilized and strategies for increasing access to PR are needed. Home-based self-monitored pulmonary rehabilitation is an alternative to outpatient rehabilitation. In the present study, patients with mild, moderate and severe COPD submitted to either an outpatient or at-home PR program for 12 weeks were analyzed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into three distinct groups: an outpatient group who performed all activities at the clinic, a home-based group who performed the activities at home and a control group. PR consisted of a combination of aerobic exercises and strengthening of upper and lower limbs 3 times a week for 12 weeks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a significant difference in the distance covered on the six-minute walk test (p < 0.05) and BODE index (p < 0.001) in the outpatient and at-home groups after participating in the rehabilitation program compared to baseline.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A home-based self-monitoring pulmonary rehabilitation program is as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and is a valid alternative for the management of patients with COPD.</p> http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401COPDhome-based pulmonary rehabilitationpulmonary rehabilitation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C
Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S
Malosa Sampaio Luciana M
Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C
Hirata Raquel
Costa Dirceu
Donner Claudio F
de Oliveira Luís VF
spellingShingle Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C
Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S
Malosa Sampaio Luciana M
Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C
Hirata Raquel
Costa Dirceu
Donner Claudio F
de Oliveira Luís VF
Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
COPD
home-based pulmonary rehabilitation
pulmonary rehabilitation
author_facet Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C
Studart Leitão Filho Fernando S
Malosa Sampaio Luciana M
Negrinho de Oliveira Ana C
Hirata Raquel
Costa Dirceu
Donner Claudio F
de Oliveira Luís VF
author_sort Mendes de Oliveira Júlio C
title Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort outpatient vs. home-based pulmonary rehabilitation in copd: a randomized controlled trial
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine
issn 2049-6958
publishDate 2010-12-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality affecting a large number of individuals in both developed and developing countries and it represents a significant financial burden for patients, families and society. Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a multidisciplinary program that integrates components of exercise training, education, nutritional support, psychological support and self-care, resulting in an improvement in dyspnea, fatigue and quality of life. Despite its proven effectiveness and the strong scientific recommendations for its routine use in the care of COPD, PR is generally underutilized and strategies for increasing access to PR are needed. Home-based self-monitored pulmonary rehabilitation is an alternative to outpatient rehabilitation. In the present study, patients with mild, moderate and severe COPD submitted to either an outpatient or at-home PR program for 12 weeks were analyzed.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>Patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into three distinct groups: an outpatient group who performed all activities at the clinic, a home-based group who performed the activities at home and a control group. PR consisted of a combination of aerobic exercises and strengthening of upper and lower limbs 3 times a week for 12 weeks.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>There was a significant difference in the distance covered on the six-minute walk test (p < 0.05) and BODE index (p < 0.001) in the outpatient and at-home groups after participating in the rehabilitation program compared to baseline.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>A home-based self-monitoring pulmonary rehabilitation program is as effective as outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and is a valid alternative for the management of patients with COPD.</p>
topic COPD
home-based pulmonary rehabilitation
pulmonary rehabilitation
url http://www.mrmjournal.com/content/5/6/401
work_keys_str_mv AT mendesdeoliveirajulioc outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT studartleitaofilhofernandos outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malosasampaiolucianam outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT negrinhodeoliveiraanac outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT hirataraquel outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT costadirceu outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT donnerclaudiof outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT deoliveiraluisvf outpatientvshomebasedpulmonaryrehabilitationincopdarandomizedcontrolledtrial
_version_ 1724875022876540928