Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view

The literature on clinical training lacks identifications of the factors that are most relevant in training programs; accordingly, the main aim of this work is to fill this research gap by assessing which factors that trainers, trainees and psychotherapists consider most relevant in psychotherapy t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Diego Rocco, Alessandro Gennaro, Lorena Filugelli, Patrizia Squarcina, Elena Antonelli
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PAGEPress Publications 2019-12-01
Series:Research in Psychotherapy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/415
id doaj-6ff9960ccb1040ab9a26b3429efcec68
record_format Article
spelling doaj-6ff9960ccb1040ab9a26b3429efcec682020-11-25T01:25:22ZengPAGEPress PublicationsResearch in Psychotherapy2499-75522239-80312019-12-0122310.4081/ripppo.2019.415Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of viewDiego Rocco0Alessandro Gennaro1Lorena Filugelli2Patrizia Squarcina3Elena Antonelli4Department of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of PaduaDepartment of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of RomeDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of PaduaDepartment of Developmental and Social Psychology, University of PaduaDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua The literature on clinical training lacks identifications of the factors that are most relevant in training programs; accordingly, the main aim of this work is to fill this research gap by assessing which factors that trainers, trainees and psychotherapists consider most relevant in psychotherapy training programs. A secondary aim is to identify whether these factors differ among trainers, trainees and psychotherapists. An ad hoc questionnaire was created and administered at 24 psychotherapy schools from 14 institutions; the sample included 641 trainees, 172 trainers and 218 psychotherapists of various theoretical orientations. The questionnaire included 63 items and used a 5-point Likert scale. An exploratory factor analysis was completed to identify the latent structure. The reliability of the dimensions was then checked. Finally, an analysis of variance and a multivariate analysis of variance were completed to achieve the study’s aims. Four factors emerged from the study’s results: trainers’ relational characteristics, supervision, transmission of clinical know-how, and theoretical background and technical support. All these factors displayed acceptable reliability and internal consistency. Moreover, their relative rankings varied based on the participants’ roles and theoretical backgrounds. This study’s results indicate that the new instrument’s psychometric qualities are acceptable. It thus could be used to develop a new approach to psychotherapy training, as this study’s results regarding trainees’ needs underline the differences between trainees’ perceptions of those needs, as compared to trainers’ and psychotherapists’ perceptions. https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/415Psychotherapy training; Questionnaire; Exploratory factor analysis; Key factors in psychotherapy training
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Diego Rocco
Alessandro Gennaro
Lorena Filugelli
Patrizia Squarcina
Elena Antonelli
spellingShingle Diego Rocco
Alessandro Gennaro
Lorena Filugelli
Patrizia Squarcina
Elena Antonelli
Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
Research in Psychotherapy
Psychotherapy training; Questionnaire; Exploratory factor analysis; Key factors in psychotherapy training
author_facet Diego Rocco
Alessandro Gennaro
Lorena Filugelli
Patrizia Squarcina
Elena Antonelli
author_sort Diego Rocco
title Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
title_short Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
title_full Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
title_fullStr Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
title_full_unstemmed Key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
title_sort key factors in psychotherapy training: an analysis of trainers’, trainees’ and psychotherapists’ points of view
publisher PAGEPress Publications
series Research in Psychotherapy
issn 2499-7552
2239-8031
publishDate 2019-12-01
description The literature on clinical training lacks identifications of the factors that are most relevant in training programs; accordingly, the main aim of this work is to fill this research gap by assessing which factors that trainers, trainees and psychotherapists consider most relevant in psychotherapy training programs. A secondary aim is to identify whether these factors differ among trainers, trainees and psychotherapists. An ad hoc questionnaire was created and administered at 24 psychotherapy schools from 14 institutions; the sample included 641 trainees, 172 trainers and 218 psychotherapists of various theoretical orientations. The questionnaire included 63 items and used a 5-point Likert scale. An exploratory factor analysis was completed to identify the latent structure. The reliability of the dimensions was then checked. Finally, an analysis of variance and a multivariate analysis of variance were completed to achieve the study’s aims. Four factors emerged from the study’s results: trainers’ relational characteristics, supervision, transmission of clinical know-how, and theoretical background and technical support. All these factors displayed acceptable reliability and internal consistency. Moreover, their relative rankings varied based on the participants’ roles and theoretical backgrounds. This study’s results indicate that the new instrument’s psychometric qualities are acceptable. It thus could be used to develop a new approach to psychotherapy training, as this study’s results regarding trainees’ needs underline the differences between trainees’ perceptions of those needs, as compared to trainers’ and psychotherapists’ perceptions.
topic Psychotherapy training; Questionnaire; Exploratory factor analysis; Key factors in psychotherapy training
url https://www.researchinpsychotherapy.org/index.php/rpsy/article/view/415
work_keys_str_mv AT diegorocco keyfactorsinpsychotherapytrainingananalysisoftrainerstraineesandpsychotherapistspointsofview
AT alessandrogennaro keyfactorsinpsychotherapytrainingananalysisoftrainerstraineesandpsychotherapistspointsofview
AT lorenafilugelli keyfactorsinpsychotherapytrainingananalysisoftrainerstraineesandpsychotherapistspointsofview
AT patriziasquarcina keyfactorsinpsychotherapytrainingananalysisoftrainerstraineesandpsychotherapistspointsofview
AT elenaantonelli keyfactorsinpsychotherapytrainingananalysisoftrainerstraineesandpsychotherapistspointsofview
_version_ 1725114357495365632