Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.

Patients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but worse results are reported after revision surgery than after primary surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first months and any differences by type of sur...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Erik Lenguerrand, Michael R Whitehouse, Vikki Wylde, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Ashley W Blom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5065160?pdf=render
id doaj-7001e2c1221f45958aadc041ad175d25
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7001e2c1221f45958aadc041ad175d252020-11-25T02:17:56ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-011110e016483910.1371/journal.pone.0164839Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.Erik LenguerrandMichael R WhitehouseVikki WyldeRachael Gooberman-HillAshley W BlomPatients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but worse results are reported after revision surgery than after primary surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first months and any differences by type of surgery have received little attention. We explored the trajectories of change in pain and function after revision hip arthroplasty to 12-months post-operatively and compare them with those observed after primary hip arthroplasty.This study is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary (n = 80 with 92% for an indication of osteoarthritis) and revision (n = 43) hip arthroplasties. WOMAC pain and function scores and walking speed were collected pre-operatively, at 3 and 12-months post-operatively. Multilevel regression models were used to chart and compare the trajectories of change (0-3 months and 3-12 months) between types of surgery.The improvements in pain and function following revision arthroplasty occurred within the first 3-months with no evidence of further change beyond this initial period. While the pattern of recovery was similar to the one observed after primary arthroplasty, improvements in the first 3-months were smaller after revision compared to primary arthroplasty. Patients listed for revision surgery reported lower pre-operative pain levels but similar post-operative levels compared to those undergoing primary surgery. At 12-months post-operation patients who underwent a revision arthroplasty had not reached the same level of function achieved by those who underwent primary arthroplasty.The post-operative improvements in pain and function are larger following primary hip arthroplasty than following revision hip arthroplasty. Irrespectively of surgery type, most of the improvements occur in the first three post-operative months. More research is required to identify whether the recovery following revision surgery could be improved with specific post-operative interventions.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5065160?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Erik Lenguerrand
Michael R Whitehouse
Vikki Wylde
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Ashley W Blom
spellingShingle Erik Lenguerrand
Michael R Whitehouse
Vikki Wylde
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Ashley W Blom
Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Erik Lenguerrand
Michael R Whitehouse
Vikki Wylde
Rachael Gooberman-Hill
Ashley W Blom
author_sort Erik Lenguerrand
title Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
title_short Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
title_full Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
title_fullStr Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
title_full_unstemmed Pain and Function Recovery Trajectories following Revision Hip Arthroplasty: Short-Term Changes and Comparison with Primary Hip Arthroplasty in the ADAPT Cohort Study.
title_sort pain and function recovery trajectories following revision hip arthroplasty: short-term changes and comparison with primary hip arthroplasty in the adapt cohort study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description Patients report similar or better pain and function before revision hip arthroplasty than before primary arthroplasty but worse results are reported after revision surgery than after primary surgery. The trajectory of post-operative recovery during the first months and any differences by type of surgery have received little attention. We explored the trajectories of change in pain and function after revision hip arthroplasty to 12-months post-operatively and compare them with those observed after primary hip arthroplasty.This study is a prospective cohort study of patients undergoing primary (n = 80 with 92% for an indication of osteoarthritis) and revision (n = 43) hip arthroplasties. WOMAC pain and function scores and walking speed were collected pre-operatively, at 3 and 12-months post-operatively. Multilevel regression models were used to chart and compare the trajectories of change (0-3 months and 3-12 months) between types of surgery.The improvements in pain and function following revision arthroplasty occurred within the first 3-months with no evidence of further change beyond this initial period. While the pattern of recovery was similar to the one observed after primary arthroplasty, improvements in the first 3-months were smaller after revision compared to primary arthroplasty. Patients listed for revision surgery reported lower pre-operative pain levels but similar post-operative levels compared to those undergoing primary surgery. At 12-months post-operation patients who underwent a revision arthroplasty had not reached the same level of function achieved by those who underwent primary arthroplasty.The post-operative improvements in pain and function are larger following primary hip arthroplasty than following revision hip arthroplasty. Irrespectively of surgery type, most of the improvements occur in the first three post-operative months. More research is required to identify whether the recovery following revision surgery could be improved with specific post-operative interventions.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5065160?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT eriklenguerrand painandfunctionrecoverytrajectoriesfollowingrevisionhiparthroplastyshorttermchangesandcomparisonwithprimaryhiparthroplastyintheadaptcohortstudy
AT michaelrwhitehouse painandfunctionrecoverytrajectoriesfollowingrevisionhiparthroplastyshorttermchangesandcomparisonwithprimaryhiparthroplastyintheadaptcohortstudy
AT vikkiwylde painandfunctionrecoverytrajectoriesfollowingrevisionhiparthroplastyshorttermchangesandcomparisonwithprimaryhiparthroplastyintheadaptcohortstudy
AT rachaelgoobermanhill painandfunctionrecoverytrajectoriesfollowingrevisionhiparthroplastyshorttermchangesandcomparisonwithprimaryhiparthroplastyintheadaptcohortstudy
AT ashleywblom painandfunctionrecoverytrajectoriesfollowingrevisionhiparthroplastyshorttermchangesandcomparisonwithprimaryhiparthroplastyintheadaptcohortstudy
_version_ 1724884165739937792