Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets

Due to the increasing number of Internet users and the volume of information exchanged by software applications, Internet packet traffic has increased significantly, which has highlighted the need to accelerate the processing required in network systems. Packet classification is one of the solutions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Navid Khezrian, Mahdi Abbasi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: PeerJ Inc. 2019-07-01
Series:PeerJ Computer Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://peerj.com/articles/cs-204.pdf
id doaj-7074ed949d0a4d02bbe317c2902dbd81
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7074ed949d0a4d02bbe317c2902dbd812020-11-25T00:31:15ZengPeerJ Inc.PeerJ Computer Science2376-59922019-07-015e20410.7717/peerj-cs.204Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packetsNavid Khezrian0Mahdi Abbasi1Computer Engineering Faculty, Sharif University of Technology, Tehran, IranDepartment of Computer Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, IranDue to the increasing number of Internet users and the volume of information exchanged by software applications, Internet packet traffic has increased significantly, which has highlighted the need to accelerate the processing required in network systems. Packet classification is one of the solutions implemented in network systems. The most important issue is to use an approach that can classify packets at the speed of the network and show optimum performance in terms of memory usage. In this study, we evaluated the performance in packet classification of two of the most important data structures used in decision trees, i.e. the skip list and splay tree. Our criteria for performance were the time of packet classification, the number of memory accesses, and memory usage of each event. These criteria were tested by the ACL and IPC rules with different numbers of rules as well as by different packet numbers. The results of the evaluation showed that the performance of skip lists is higher than that of splay trees. By increasing the number of classifying rules, both the difference in the speed of packet classification and the superiority of the performance of the skip list over that of the splay tree become more significant. The skip list also maintains its superiority over the splay tree in lower memory usage. The results of the experiments confirm the scalability of this method in comparison to the splay tree method.https://peerj.com/articles/cs-204.pdfSkip listSplay treeFirewallMemoryTimePerforrmance
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Navid Khezrian
Mahdi Abbasi
spellingShingle Navid Khezrian
Mahdi Abbasi
Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
PeerJ Computer Science
Skip list
Splay tree
Firewall
Memory
Time
Perforrmance
author_facet Navid Khezrian
Mahdi Abbasi
author_sort Navid Khezrian
title Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
title_short Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
title_full Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
title_fullStr Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
title_sort comparison of the performance of skip lists and splay trees in classification of internet packets
publisher PeerJ Inc.
series PeerJ Computer Science
issn 2376-5992
publishDate 2019-07-01
description Due to the increasing number of Internet users and the volume of information exchanged by software applications, Internet packet traffic has increased significantly, which has highlighted the need to accelerate the processing required in network systems. Packet classification is one of the solutions implemented in network systems. The most important issue is to use an approach that can classify packets at the speed of the network and show optimum performance in terms of memory usage. In this study, we evaluated the performance in packet classification of two of the most important data structures used in decision trees, i.e. the skip list and splay tree. Our criteria for performance were the time of packet classification, the number of memory accesses, and memory usage of each event. These criteria were tested by the ACL and IPC rules with different numbers of rules as well as by different packet numbers. The results of the evaluation showed that the performance of skip lists is higher than that of splay trees. By increasing the number of classifying rules, both the difference in the speed of packet classification and the superiority of the performance of the skip list over that of the splay tree become more significant. The skip list also maintains its superiority over the splay tree in lower memory usage. The results of the experiments confirm the scalability of this method in comparison to the splay tree method.
topic Skip list
Splay tree
Firewall
Memory
Time
Perforrmance
url https://peerj.com/articles/cs-204.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT navidkhezrian comparisonoftheperformanceofskiplistsandsplaytreesinclassificationofinternetpackets
AT mahdiabbasi comparisonoftheperformanceofskiplistsandsplaytreesinclassificationofinternetpackets
_version_ 1725322849711816704