Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
Objective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A stan...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
2015-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Jose |
id |
doaj-7088df9fd812475a855eda9085e91cb5 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7088df9fd812475a855eda9085e91cb52021-01-08T03:50:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies2348-21252348-36442015-01-012211311710.4103/2348-2125.162965Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control studyBetty Anna JoseSubramani Arumugam SubramaniVarsha MokhasiMini JayanObjective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A standardized questionnaire was prepared to investigate the information on the demographic characteristics and consanguinity. Chi-square and odds ratio were used to evaluate the risk of consanguinity in clefts in the craniofacial region. Results: There is a significant association between consanguinity and clefts (P = 0.001) when comparing the consanguinity and no consanguinity in cleft group and non-cleft group, and the association is more with the second degree consanguinity than the third degree consanguinity. Conclusion: Consanguinity is a risk factor for clefts in the craniofacial region.http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Josecleftconsanguinityrisk factor |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Betty Anna Jose Subramani Arumugam Subramani Varsha Mokhasi Mini Jayan |
spellingShingle |
Betty Anna Jose Subramani Arumugam Subramani Varsha Mokhasi Mini Jayan Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies cleft consanguinity risk factor |
author_facet |
Betty Anna Jose Subramani Arumugam Subramani Varsha Mokhasi Mini Jayan |
author_sort |
Betty Anna Jose |
title |
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study |
title_short |
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study |
title_full |
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study |
title_fullStr |
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study |
title_sort |
consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: a retrospective case-control study |
publisher |
Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications |
series |
Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies |
issn |
2348-2125 2348-3644 |
publishDate |
2015-01-01 |
description |
Objective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A standardized questionnaire was prepared to investigate the information on the demographic characteristics and consanguinity. Chi-square and odds ratio were used to evaluate the risk of consanguinity in clefts in the craniofacial region. Results: There is a significant association between consanguinity and clefts (P = 0.001) when comparing the consanguinity and no consanguinity in cleft group and non-cleft group, and the association is more with the second degree consanguinity than the third degree consanguinity. Conclusion: Consanguinity is a risk factor for clefts in the craniofacial region. |
topic |
cleft consanguinity risk factor |
url |
http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Jose |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT bettyannajose consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT subramaniarumugamsubramani consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT varshamokhasi consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy AT minijayan consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy |
_version_ |
1724345236786774016 |