Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study

Objective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A stan...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Betty Anna Jose, Subramani Arumugam Subramani, Varsha Mokhasi, Mini Jayan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2015-01-01
Series:Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Jose
id doaj-7088df9fd812475a855eda9085e91cb5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7088df9fd812475a855eda9085e91cb52021-01-08T03:50:27ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies2348-21252348-36442015-01-012211311710.4103/2348-2125.162965Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control studyBetty Anna JoseSubramani Arumugam SubramaniVarsha MokhasiMini JayanObjective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A standardized questionnaire was prepared to investigate the information on the demographic characteristics and consanguinity. Chi-square and odds ratio were used to evaluate the risk of consanguinity in clefts in the craniofacial region. Results: There is a significant association between consanguinity and clefts (P = 0.001) when comparing the consanguinity and no consanguinity in cleft group and non-cleft group, and the association is more with the second degree consanguinity than the third degree consanguinity. Conclusion: Consanguinity is a risk factor for clefts in the craniofacial region.http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Josecleftconsanguinityrisk factor
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Betty Anna Jose
Subramani Arumugam Subramani
Varsha Mokhasi
Mini Jayan
spellingShingle Betty Anna Jose
Subramani Arumugam Subramani
Varsha Mokhasi
Mini Jayan
Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies
cleft
consanguinity
risk factor
author_facet Betty Anna Jose
Subramani Arumugam Subramani
Varsha Mokhasi
Mini Jayan
author_sort Betty Anna Jose
title Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
title_short Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
title_full Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
title_fullStr Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: A retrospective case-control study
title_sort consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region: a retrospective case-control study
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Journal of Cleft Lip Palate and Craniofacial Anomalies
issn 2348-2125
2348-3644
publishDate 2015-01-01
description Objective: The objective was to investigate the association between consanguinity and clefts in the craniofacial region. Materials and Methods: Sample consists of 179 non-syndromic cases of clefts in the craniofacial region and 200 healthy controls with no cleft or family history of clefting. A standardized questionnaire was prepared to investigate the information on the demographic characteristics and consanguinity. Chi-square and odds ratio were used to evaluate the risk of consanguinity in clefts in the craniofacial region. Results: There is a significant association between consanguinity and clefts (P = 0.001) when comparing the consanguinity and no consanguinity in cleft group and non-cleft group, and the association is more with the second degree consanguinity than the third degree consanguinity. Conclusion: Consanguinity is a risk factor for clefts in the craniofacial region.
topic cleft
consanguinity
risk factor
url http://www.jclpca.org/article.asp?issn=2348-2125;year=2015;volume=2;issue=2;spage=113;epage=117;aulast=Jose
work_keys_str_mv AT bettyannajose consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT subramaniarumugamsubramani consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT varshamokhasi consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
AT minijayan consanguinityandcleftsinthecraniofacialregionaretrospectivecasecontrolstudy
_version_ 1724345236786774016