Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation

Purpose: To compare the accuracy of isolated manual marking and smartphone-assisted manual marking with the Verion image-guided system for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 42 eyes of 36 patients planned for phacoemulsification with toric IO...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zain Irfan Khatib, Suhas S Haldipurkar, Vijay Shetty
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2020-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=3;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=Khatib
id doaj-70920d071d7a49b5879890c06c6f4f95
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70920d071d7a49b5879890c06c6f4f952020-11-25T02:25:55ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Ophthalmology0301-47381998-36892020-01-0168345545810.4103/ijo.IJO_987_19Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantationZain Irfan KhatibSuhas S HaldipurkarVijay ShettyPurpose: To compare the accuracy of isolated manual marking and smartphone-assisted manual marking with the Verion image-guided system for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 42 eyes of 36 patients planned for phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation with corneal astigmatism >1D as measured on Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer were included. Patients were preoperatively registered and photographed on the Verion image-guided system. In the operating room, the patient's eye was manually marked at the 6 o′ clock limbus (Manual axis-90°) on slit-lamp in sitting position. Next, using the smartphone android app—iToric Patwardhan, the exact mark axis was confirmed (Smartphone axis). Following this, the patient was taken on the operation table where the mark axis was confirmed with Verion digital overlay on an external screen (Verion axis). The absolute angular deviation of manual axis from Verion was compared with the absolute angular deviation of the smartphone axis from Verion as the primary outcome measure. Results: The mean absolute angular deviation between the smartphone axis and the Verion axis was 2.62°, which was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that between the manual axis and Verion axis (4.60°). Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the smartphone axis and Verion axis was 0.88 indicating a strong agreement between the two. Conclusion: Smartphone-assisted manual marking significantly improves the accuracy of manual marking alone when comparing with the Verion Digital Marker system for toric IOL implantation.http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=3;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=Khatibsmartphonetoricverion
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Zain Irfan Khatib
Suhas S Haldipurkar
Vijay Shetty
spellingShingle Zain Irfan Khatib
Suhas S Haldipurkar
Vijay Shetty
Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
smartphone
toric
verion
author_facet Zain Irfan Khatib
Suhas S Haldipurkar
Vijay Shetty
author_sort Zain Irfan Khatib
title Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
title_short Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
title_full Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
title_fullStr Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
title_full_unstemmed Verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
title_sort verion digital marking versus smartphone-assisted manual marking and isolated manual marking in toric intraocular lens implantation
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
series Indian Journal of Ophthalmology
issn 0301-4738
1998-3689
publishDate 2020-01-01
description Purpose: To compare the accuracy of isolated manual marking and smartphone-assisted manual marking with the Verion image-guided system for toric intraocular lens (IOL) implantation. Methods: In this prospective observational study, 42 eyes of 36 patients planned for phacoemulsification with toric IOL implantation with corneal astigmatism >1D as measured on Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer were included. Patients were preoperatively registered and photographed on the Verion image-guided system. In the operating room, the patient's eye was manually marked at the 6 o′ clock limbus (Manual axis-90°) on slit-lamp in sitting position. Next, using the smartphone android app—iToric Patwardhan, the exact mark axis was confirmed (Smartphone axis). Following this, the patient was taken on the operation table where the mark axis was confirmed with Verion digital overlay on an external screen (Verion axis). The absolute angular deviation of manual axis from Verion was compared with the absolute angular deviation of the smartphone axis from Verion as the primary outcome measure. Results: The mean absolute angular deviation between the smartphone axis and the Verion axis was 2.62°, which was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that between the manual axis and Verion axis (4.60°). Moreover, the intraclass correlation coefficient between the smartphone axis and Verion axis was 0.88 indicating a strong agreement between the two. Conclusion: Smartphone-assisted manual marking significantly improves the accuracy of manual marking alone when comparing with the Verion Digital Marker system for toric IOL implantation.
topic smartphone
toric
verion
url http://www.ijo.in/article.asp?issn=0301-4738;year=2020;volume=68;issue=3;spage=455;epage=458;aulast=Khatib
work_keys_str_mv AT zainirfankhatib veriondigitalmarkingversussmartphoneassistedmanualmarkingandisolatedmanualmarkingintoricintraocularlensimplantation
AT suhasshaldipurkar veriondigitalmarkingversussmartphoneassistedmanualmarkingandisolatedmanualmarkingintoricintraocularlensimplantation
AT vijayshetty veriondigitalmarkingversussmartphoneassistedmanualmarkingandisolatedmanualmarkingintoricintraocularlensimplantation
_version_ 1724849527234494464