A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens

Abstract Background Deleterious genetic variation can increase in frequency as a result of mutations, genetic drift, and genetic hitchhiking. Although individual effects are often small, the cumulative effect of deleterious genetic variation can impact population fitness substantially. In this study...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Martijn F. L. Derks, Hendrik-Jan Megens, Mirte Bosse, Jeroen Visscher, Katrijn Peeters, Marco C. A. M. Bink, Addie Vereijken, Christian Gross, Dick de Ridder, Marcel J. T. Reinders, Martien A. M. Groenen
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: BMC 2018-04-01
Series:Genetics Selection Evolution
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12711-018-0390-1
id doaj-70b4db8f2abf4b63bd0cba9411202faa
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70b4db8f2abf4b63bd0cba9411202faa2020-11-25T00:33:52ZdeuBMCGenetics Selection Evolution1297-96862018-04-0150111410.1186/s12711-018-0390-1A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickensMartijn F. L. Derks0Hendrik-Jan Megens1Mirte Bosse2Jeroen Visscher3Katrijn Peeters4Marco C. A. M. Bink5Addie Vereijken6Christian Gross7Dick de Ridder8Marcel J. T. Reinders9Martien A. M. Groenen10Wageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and GenomicsWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and GenomicsWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and GenomicsHendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V.Hendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V.Hendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V.Hendrix Genetics Research Technology & Service B.V.Bioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and ResearchBioinformatics Group, Wageningen University and ResearchDelft Bioinformatics Lab, Delft University of TechnologyWageningen University & Research Animal Breeding and GenomicsAbstract Background Deleterious genetic variation can increase in frequency as a result of mutations, genetic drift, and genetic hitchhiking. Although individual effects are often small, the cumulative effect of deleterious genetic variation can impact population fitness substantially. In this study, we examined the genome of commercial purebred chicken lines for deleterious and functional variations, combining genotype and whole-genome sequence data. Results We analysed over 22,000 animals that were genotyped on a 60 K SNP chip from four purebred lines (two white egg and two brown egg layer lines) and two crossbred lines. We identified 79 haplotypes that showed a significant deficit in homozygous carriers. This deficit was assumed to stem from haplotypes that potentially harbour lethal recessive variations. To identify potentially deleterious mutations, a catalogue of over 10 million variants was derived from 250 whole-genome sequenced animals from three purebred white-egg layer lines. Out of 4219 putative deleterious variants, 152 mutations were identified that likely induce embryonic lethality in the homozygous state. Inferred deleterious variation showed evidence of purifying selection and deleterious alleles were generally overrepresented in regions of low recombination. Finally, we found evidence that mutations, which were inferred to be evolutionally intolerant, likely have positive effects in commercial chicken populations. Conclusions We present a comprehensive genomic perspective on deleterious and functional genetic variation in egg layer breeding lines, which are under intensive selection and characterized by a small effective population size. We show that deleterious variation is subject to purifying selection and that there is a positive relationship between recombination rate and purging efficiency. In addition, multiple putative functional coding variants were discovered in selective sweep regions, which are likely under positive selection. Together, this study provides a unique molecular perspective on functional and deleterious variation in commercial egg-laying chickens, which can enhance current genomic breeding practices to lower the frequency of undesirable variants in the population.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12711-018-0390-1
collection DOAJ
language deu
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Martijn F. L. Derks
Hendrik-Jan Megens
Mirte Bosse
Jeroen Visscher
Katrijn Peeters
Marco C. A. M. Bink
Addie Vereijken
Christian Gross
Dick de Ridder
Marcel J. T. Reinders
Martien A. M. Groenen
spellingShingle Martijn F. L. Derks
Hendrik-Jan Megens
Mirte Bosse
Jeroen Visscher
Katrijn Peeters
Marco C. A. M. Bink
Addie Vereijken
Christian Gross
Dick de Ridder
Marcel J. T. Reinders
Martien A. M. Groenen
A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
Genetics Selection Evolution
author_facet Martijn F. L. Derks
Hendrik-Jan Megens
Mirte Bosse
Jeroen Visscher
Katrijn Peeters
Marco C. A. M. Bink
Addie Vereijken
Christian Gross
Dick de Ridder
Marcel J. T. Reinders
Martien A. M. Groenen
author_sort Martijn F. L. Derks
title A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
title_short A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
title_full A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
title_fullStr A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
title_full_unstemmed A survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
title_sort survey of functional genomic variation in domesticated chickens
publisher BMC
series Genetics Selection Evolution
issn 1297-9686
publishDate 2018-04-01
description Abstract Background Deleterious genetic variation can increase in frequency as a result of mutations, genetic drift, and genetic hitchhiking. Although individual effects are often small, the cumulative effect of deleterious genetic variation can impact population fitness substantially. In this study, we examined the genome of commercial purebred chicken lines for deleterious and functional variations, combining genotype and whole-genome sequence data. Results We analysed over 22,000 animals that were genotyped on a 60 K SNP chip from four purebred lines (two white egg and two brown egg layer lines) and two crossbred lines. We identified 79 haplotypes that showed a significant deficit in homozygous carriers. This deficit was assumed to stem from haplotypes that potentially harbour lethal recessive variations. To identify potentially deleterious mutations, a catalogue of over 10 million variants was derived from 250 whole-genome sequenced animals from three purebred white-egg layer lines. Out of 4219 putative deleterious variants, 152 mutations were identified that likely induce embryonic lethality in the homozygous state. Inferred deleterious variation showed evidence of purifying selection and deleterious alleles were generally overrepresented in regions of low recombination. Finally, we found evidence that mutations, which were inferred to be evolutionally intolerant, likely have positive effects in commercial chicken populations. Conclusions We present a comprehensive genomic perspective on deleterious and functional genetic variation in egg layer breeding lines, which are under intensive selection and characterized by a small effective population size. We show that deleterious variation is subject to purifying selection and that there is a positive relationship between recombination rate and purging efficiency. In addition, multiple putative functional coding variants were discovered in selective sweep regions, which are likely under positive selection. Together, this study provides a unique molecular perspective on functional and deleterious variation in commercial egg-laying chickens, which can enhance current genomic breeding practices to lower the frequency of undesirable variants in the population.
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12711-018-0390-1
work_keys_str_mv AT martijnflderks asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT hendrikjanmegens asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT mirtebosse asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT jeroenvisscher asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT katrijnpeeters asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT marcocambink asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT addievereijken asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT christiangross asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT dickderidder asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT marceljtreinders asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT martienamgroenen asurveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT martijnflderks surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT hendrikjanmegens surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT mirtebosse surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT jeroenvisscher surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT katrijnpeeters surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT marcocambink surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT addievereijken surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT christiangross surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT dickderidder surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT marceljtreinders surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
AT martienamgroenen surveyoffunctionalgenomicvariationindomesticatedchickens
_version_ 1725314440970108928