Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains

Abstract Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity tend to be positively correlated, but understanding of this relationship is limited in part by structural metrics tending to quantify only horizontal or vertical variation, and that do not reflect internal structure. We developed new metrics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jonathan A. Walter, Atticus E. L. Stovall, Jeff W. Atkins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2021-03-01
Series:Ecosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3390
id doaj-70dc6f5165fb4db7a4633270b706ef8c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70dc6f5165fb4db7a4633270b706ef8c2021-04-18T21:00:38ZengWileyEcosphere2150-89252021-03-01123n/an/a10.1002/ecs2.3390Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky MountainsJonathan A. Walter0Atticus E. L. Stovall1Jeff W. Atkins2Department of Environmental Sciences University of Virginia Charlottesville Virginia22904USANASA Goddard Space Flight Center Biospheric Sciences Lab Greenbelt Maryland20771USADepartment of Biology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond Virginia23284USAAbstract Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity tend to be positively correlated, but understanding of this relationship is limited in part by structural metrics tending to quantify only horizontal or vertical variation, and that do not reflect internal structure. We developed new metrics for quantifying internal vegetation structural complexity using terrestrial LiDAR scanning and applied them to 12 NEON forest plots across an elevational gradient in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. We asked (1) How do our newly developed structure metrics compare to traditional metrics? (2) How does forest structure vary with elevation in a high‐biodiversity, high topographic complexity region? (3) How do forest structural metrics vary in the strength of their relationships with vascular plant biodiversity? Our new measures of canopy density (Depth) and structural complexity (σDepth), and their canopy height‐normalized counterparts, were sensitive to structural variations and effectively summarized horizontal and vertical dimensions of structural complexity. Forest structure varied widely across plots spanning the elevational range of GRSM, with taller, more structurally complex forests at lower elevation. Vascular plant biodiversity was negatively correlated with elevation and more strongly positively correlated with vegetation structure variables. The strong correlations we observed between canopy structural complexity and biodiversity suggest that structural complexity metrics could be used to assay plant biodiversity over large areas in concert with airborne and spaceborne platforms.https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3390elevationforestLiDARspecies richnessstructural complexitytopography
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jonathan A. Walter
Atticus E. L. Stovall
Jeff W. Atkins
spellingShingle Jonathan A. Walter
Atticus E. L. Stovall
Jeff W. Atkins
Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
Ecosphere
elevation
forest
LiDAR
species richness
structural complexity
topography
author_facet Jonathan A. Walter
Atticus E. L. Stovall
Jeff W. Atkins
author_sort Jonathan A. Walter
title Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
title_short Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
title_full Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
title_fullStr Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
title_full_unstemmed Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the Great Smoky Mountains
title_sort vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity in the great smoky mountains
publisher Wiley
series Ecosphere
issn 2150-8925
publishDate 2021-03-01
description Abstract Vegetation structural complexity and biodiversity tend to be positively correlated, but understanding of this relationship is limited in part by structural metrics tending to quantify only horizontal or vertical variation, and that do not reflect internal structure. We developed new metrics for quantifying internal vegetation structural complexity using terrestrial LiDAR scanning and applied them to 12 NEON forest plots across an elevational gradient in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, USA. We asked (1) How do our newly developed structure metrics compare to traditional metrics? (2) How does forest structure vary with elevation in a high‐biodiversity, high topographic complexity region? (3) How do forest structural metrics vary in the strength of their relationships with vascular plant biodiversity? Our new measures of canopy density (Depth) and structural complexity (σDepth), and their canopy height‐normalized counterparts, were sensitive to structural variations and effectively summarized horizontal and vertical dimensions of structural complexity. Forest structure varied widely across plots spanning the elevational range of GRSM, with taller, more structurally complex forests at lower elevation. Vascular plant biodiversity was negatively correlated with elevation and more strongly positively correlated with vegetation structure variables. The strong correlations we observed between canopy structural complexity and biodiversity suggest that structural complexity metrics could be used to assay plant biodiversity over large areas in concert with airborne and spaceborne platforms.
topic elevation
forest
LiDAR
species richness
structural complexity
topography
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ecs2.3390
work_keys_str_mv AT jonathanawalter vegetationstructuralcomplexityandbiodiversityinthegreatsmokymountains
AT atticuselstovall vegetationstructuralcomplexityandbiodiversityinthegreatsmokymountains
AT jeffwatkins vegetationstructuralcomplexityandbiodiversityinthegreatsmokymountains
_version_ 1721521829315608576