Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain

« There was nothing ». The fact that this expression appears regularly in speeches from two different kinds of urban renewal projects reveals how the presence of some social groups is being erased by contemporary urban planning. We used the qualitative data from our case studies – a recently built h...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matthieu Adam, Léa Mestdagh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Université Lille 1 2019-04-01
Series:Territoire en Mouvement
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/tem/5241
id doaj-70dd3ff428a647e692ced3fd5f212954
record_format Article
spelling doaj-70dd3ff428a647e692ced3fd5f2129542020-11-24T21:59:51ZengUniversité Lille 1Territoire en Mouvement1950-56982019-04-01Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporainMatthieu AdamLéa Mestdagh« There was nothing ». The fact that this expression appears regularly in speeches from two different kinds of urban renewal projects reveals how the presence of some social groups is being erased by contemporary urban planning. We used the qualitative data from our case studies – a recently built housing development project in Lyon and several shared gardens in Paris - to demonstrate how the presence of lower classes is at the same time erased and stigmatized when it is replaced by more socially privileged groups. The comparative analysis showcases the challenges. On the one hand, the groups of higher classes perform this process in order to balance their lack of history in the neighborhood which is the only legitimate barrier to their installation therein. On the other hand, the stigmatization element focuses the attention on individual behaviours and minimizes the fact that competitions for space between social groups are collective political fights. Such two aspects intertwine allowing us to outline the social roles of the producers, as well as the relationships of domination brought forth by the urban planning game.http://journals.openedition.org/tem/5241invisibilisationstigmatisationurban planninggentrificationsegregation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Matthieu Adam
Léa Mestdagh
spellingShingle Matthieu Adam
Léa Mestdagh
Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
Territoire en Mouvement
invisibilisation
stigmatisation
urban planning
gentrification
segregation
author_facet Matthieu Adam
Léa Mestdagh
author_sort Matthieu Adam
title Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
title_short Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
title_full Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
title_fullStr Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
title_full_unstemmed Invisibiliser pour dominer. L’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
title_sort invisibiliser pour dominer. l’effacement des classes populaires dans l’urbanisme contemporain
publisher Université Lille 1
series Territoire en Mouvement
issn 1950-5698
publishDate 2019-04-01
description « There was nothing ». The fact that this expression appears regularly in speeches from two different kinds of urban renewal projects reveals how the presence of some social groups is being erased by contemporary urban planning. We used the qualitative data from our case studies – a recently built housing development project in Lyon and several shared gardens in Paris - to demonstrate how the presence of lower classes is at the same time erased and stigmatized when it is replaced by more socially privileged groups. The comparative analysis showcases the challenges. On the one hand, the groups of higher classes perform this process in order to balance their lack of history in the neighborhood which is the only legitimate barrier to their installation therein. On the other hand, the stigmatization element focuses the attention on individual behaviours and minimizes the fact that competitions for space between social groups are collective political fights. Such two aspects intertwine allowing us to outline the social roles of the producers, as well as the relationships of domination brought forth by the urban planning game.
topic invisibilisation
stigmatisation
urban planning
gentrification
segregation
url http://journals.openedition.org/tem/5241
work_keys_str_mv AT matthieuadam invisibiliserpourdominerleffacementdesclassespopulairesdanslurbanismecontemporain
AT leamestdagh invisibiliserpourdominerleffacementdesclassespopulairesdanslurbanismecontemporain
_version_ 1725846936345378816