Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates
In recent years, there has been intensified development of cost-effective alternatives to conventional force plates, such as those of Kistler and AMTI, in clinical and scientific research. To our knowledge, the evidence for existing validity and reliability of the HUMAC Balance System has so far bee...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2017-07-01
|
Series: | Technologies |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/5/3/44 |
id |
doaj-713ec9446db94c748176dd7fe0b836d2 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-713ec9446db94c748176dd7fe0b836d22020-11-24T21:28:03ZengMDPI AGTechnologies2227-70802017-07-01534410.3390/technologies5030044technologies5030044Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force PlatesJan Jens Koltermann0Martin Gerber1Heidrun Beck2Michael Beck3University Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, GermanyClinic Niederlausitz GmbH, Center for Neurology, 01968 Senftenberg, GermanyUniversity Center for Orthopedic and Trauma Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, 01307 Dresden, GermanyInstitute of Electrical Systems and Energy Logistics, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Electrical and Energy Systems, Brandenburg University of Technology Cottbus-Senftenberg, 01968 Senftenberg, GermanyIn recent years, there has been intensified development of cost-effective alternatives to conventional force plates, such as those of Kistler and AMTI, in clinical and scientific research. To our knowledge, the evidence for existing validity and reliability of the HUMAC Balance System has so far been lacking. Over the course of the study, the HUMAC Balance System, which is based on the WII Balance Board technology, was tested. 26 HUMAC Balance Systems in conjunction with 2 force plates, each from the manufacturers Kistler and AMTI, were examined and their properties under static and dynamic conditions were evaluated. Under static conditions, the HUMAC Balance System revealed a relatively constant and comparatively small margin of displacement error. However, tests of the force plates under dynamic conditions revealed contrasting results. The conventional force plates, with a margin of error of 2.5%, proved to have a smaller margin of error compared to the HUMAC Balance System, which had margins of error of 8.6% and 6.1% in x and y directions, respectively. A calibration method was developed to overcome these systematic deviations. After applying the calibration, the Balance Board margin of error was reduced to an acceptable maximum of 0.18%.https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/5/3/44COPforce plateAMTIKistlerWIIcentre of pressurepostural controlbalance |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Jan Jens Koltermann Martin Gerber Heidrun Beck Michael Beck |
spellingShingle |
Jan Jens Koltermann Martin Gerber Heidrun Beck Michael Beck Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates Technologies COP force plate AMTI Kistler WII centre of pressure postural control balance |
author_facet |
Jan Jens Koltermann Martin Gerber Heidrun Beck Michael Beck |
author_sort |
Jan Jens Koltermann |
title |
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates |
title_short |
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates |
title_full |
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates |
title_sort |
validation of the humac balance system in comparison with conventional force plates |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Technologies |
issn |
2227-7080 |
publishDate |
2017-07-01 |
description |
In recent years, there has been intensified development of cost-effective alternatives to conventional force plates, such as those of Kistler and AMTI, in clinical and scientific research. To our knowledge, the evidence for existing validity and reliability of the HUMAC Balance System has so far been lacking. Over the course of the study, the HUMAC Balance System, which is based on the WII Balance Board technology, was tested. 26 HUMAC Balance Systems in conjunction with 2 force plates, each from the manufacturers Kistler and AMTI, were examined and their properties under static and dynamic conditions were evaluated. Under static conditions, the HUMAC Balance System revealed a relatively constant and comparatively small margin of displacement error. However, tests of the force plates under dynamic conditions revealed contrasting results. The conventional force plates, with a margin of error of 2.5%, proved to have a smaller margin of error compared to the HUMAC Balance System, which had margins of error of 8.6% and 6.1% in x and y directions, respectively. A calibration method was developed to overcome these systematic deviations. After applying the calibration, the Balance Board margin of error was reduced to an acceptable maximum of 0.18%. |
topic |
COP force plate AMTI Kistler WII centre of pressure postural control balance |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7080/5/3/44 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT janjenskoltermann validationofthehumacbalancesystemincomparisonwithconventionalforceplates AT martingerber validationofthehumacbalancesystemincomparisonwithconventionalforceplates AT heidrunbeck validationofthehumacbalancesystemincomparisonwithconventionalforceplates AT michaelbeck validationofthehumacbalancesystemincomparisonwithconventionalforceplates |
_version_ |
1725971874833235968 |