Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry

Background and aims: In order to assess specific factors There are several risk assessmentmethods including occupational repetitive action (OCRA) which is used in industries withrepetitive motion, increased force, awkward posture, and lack of recovery periods.These riskfactors exists in assembly lin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A Hassanzade, S .karimi, E Habib
Format: Article
Language:fas
Published: Iran University of Medical Sciences 2008-04-01
Series:Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
Subjects:
NMQ
Online Access:http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-16&slc_lang=en&sid=1
id doaj-718f5c54194f4380afe0495cd2c4aa2c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-718f5c54194f4380afe0495cd2c4aa2c2020-11-24T23:23:57ZfasIran University of Medical SciencesSalāmat-i kār-i Īrān1735-51332228-74932008-04-01517076Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industryA HassanzadeS .karimiE HabibBackground and aims: In order to assess specific factors There are several risk assessmentmethods including occupational repetitive action (OCRA) which is used in industries withrepetitive motion, increased force, awkward posture, and lack of recovery periods.These riskfactors exists in assembly lines, and the purpose of this investigation is assessment of ergonomicrisk factors by OCRA method in assembly lines.Methods: Job analysis was done by observation and each job was degraded to tasks, actionsand movements. Nordic standard questionnaire (NMQ) was used for demographic data andupper limbs MSD complaints in 10 factories. Two assembly lines were assessed and 166 OCRAindices were obtained and analyzed with OCRA software and SPSS software using chi-squareand paired t- test.Results: The results showed that in line B the highest risk in right hand was 66% (low risk), andin line Awas 44% (high risk). In line B the highest risk in left hand was 53.19% (low risk) and inline A was 38% (low risk). The mean value of right and left hand exposure indices wasinsignificantly different (p<0.001). There was significant relationship between UEMSDs andhand type (p<0.001) and between UEMSDs and age (p<0.001).Conclusion: Line Ahad more risk than line B with respect to repetitive movements. In line Athe highest risk was in the right hand whereas in line B highest risk was seen in the left hand. Asthe most prevalent complaints were in wrists and fingers. We conclude that these parts are moreinvolved upper limbs in assembly line. Finally the OCRA method can be a useful method forevaluation of UEMSDs in repetitive tasks of the assembly industry.http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-16&slc_lang=en&sid=1riskfactorOCRAAssembly industryNMQUEMSDs
collection DOAJ
language fas
format Article
sources DOAJ
author A Hassanzade
S .karimi
E Habib
spellingShingle A Hassanzade
S .karimi
E Habib
Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
riskfactor
OCRA
Assembly industry
NMQ
UEMSDs
author_facet A Hassanzade
S .karimi
E Habib
author_sort A Hassanzade
title Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
title_short Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
title_full Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
title_fullStr Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by OCRA method in assembly industry
title_sort evaluation of ergonomic risk factors by ocra method in assembly industry
publisher Iran University of Medical Sciences
series Salāmat-i kār-i Īrān
issn 1735-5133
2228-7493
publishDate 2008-04-01
description Background and aims: In order to assess specific factors There are several risk assessmentmethods including occupational repetitive action (OCRA) which is used in industries withrepetitive motion, increased force, awkward posture, and lack of recovery periods.These riskfactors exists in assembly lines, and the purpose of this investigation is assessment of ergonomicrisk factors by OCRA method in assembly lines.Methods: Job analysis was done by observation and each job was degraded to tasks, actionsand movements. Nordic standard questionnaire (NMQ) was used for demographic data andupper limbs MSD complaints in 10 factories. Two assembly lines were assessed and 166 OCRAindices were obtained and analyzed with OCRA software and SPSS software using chi-squareand paired t- test.Results: The results showed that in line B the highest risk in right hand was 66% (low risk), andin line Awas 44% (high risk). In line B the highest risk in left hand was 53.19% (low risk) and inline A was 38% (low risk). The mean value of right and left hand exposure indices wasinsignificantly different (p<0.001). There was significant relationship between UEMSDs andhand type (p<0.001) and between UEMSDs and age (p<0.001).Conclusion: Line Ahad more risk than line B with respect to repetitive movements. In line Athe highest risk was in the right hand whereas in line B highest risk was seen in the left hand. Asthe most prevalent complaints were in wrists and fingers. We conclude that these parts are moreinvolved upper limbs in assembly line. Finally the OCRA method can be a useful method forevaluation of UEMSDs in repetitive tasks of the assembly industry.
topic riskfactor
OCRA
Assembly industry
NMQ
UEMSDs
url http://ioh.tums.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-3-16&slc_lang=en&sid=1
work_keys_str_mv AT ahassanzade evaluationofergonomicriskfactorsbyocramethodinassemblyindustry
AT skarimi evaluationofergonomicriskfactorsbyocramethodinassemblyindustry
AT ehabib evaluationofergonomicriskfactorsbyocramethodinassemblyindustry
_version_ 1725562737031905280