Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.

Determining correlates of density for large carnivores is important to understand their ecological requirements and develop conservation strategies. Of several earlier density studies conducted globally, relatively few addressed a scale (usually >1000 km2) that allows inference on correlates of d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller, Simone Tenan, Nikolaj Scharff, Francesco Rovero
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2019-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209541
id doaj-719a688b02ea409eae94f4e37d19b105
record_format Article
spelling doaj-719a688b02ea409eae94f4e37d19b1052021-03-03T20:38:05ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032019-01-01146e020954110.1371/journal.pone.0209541Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.Rasmus Worsøe HavmøllerSimone TenanNikolaj ScharffFrancesco RoveroDetermining correlates of density for large carnivores is important to understand their ecological requirements and develop conservation strategies. Of several earlier density studies conducted globally, relatively few addressed a scale (usually >1000 km2) that allows inference on correlates of density over heterogeneous landscapes. We deployed 164 camera trap stations covering ~2500 km2 across five areas characterized by broadly different vegetation cover in the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania, to investigate correlates of density for a widespread and adaptable carnivore, the leopard (Panthera pardus). We modelled data in a spatially explicit capture-recapture framework, with both biotic and abiotic covariates hypothesised to influence density. We found that leopard density increased with distance to protected area boundary (mean±SE estimated effect = 0.44±0.20), a proxy for both protected area extent and distance from surrounding human settlements. We estimated mean density at 4.22 leopards/100 km2 (85% CI = 3.33‒5.35/100 km2), with no variation across habitat types. Results indicate that protected area extent and anthropogenic disturbance limit leopard populations whereas no support was found for prey availability and trap array as drivers of leopard density. Such vulnerability is relevant to the conservation of the leopard, which is generally considered more resilient to human disturbance than other large cats. Our findings support the notion that protected areas are important to preserve viable population of leopards, increasingly so in times of unprecedented habitat fragmentation. Protection of buffer zones smoothing the abrupt impact of human activities at reserve edges also appears of critical conservation relevance.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209541
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller
Simone Tenan
Nikolaj Scharff
Francesco Rovero
spellingShingle Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller
Simone Tenan
Nikolaj Scharff
Francesco Rovero
Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller
Simone Tenan
Nikolaj Scharff
Francesco Rovero
author_sort Rasmus Worsøe Havmøller
title Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
title_short Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
title_full Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
title_fullStr Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
title_full_unstemmed Reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an African leopard (Panthera pardus) meta-population.
title_sort reserve size and anthropogenic disturbance affect the density of an african leopard (panthera pardus) meta-population.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Determining correlates of density for large carnivores is important to understand their ecological requirements and develop conservation strategies. Of several earlier density studies conducted globally, relatively few addressed a scale (usually >1000 km2) that allows inference on correlates of density over heterogeneous landscapes. We deployed 164 camera trap stations covering ~2500 km2 across five areas characterized by broadly different vegetation cover in the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania, to investigate correlates of density for a widespread and adaptable carnivore, the leopard (Panthera pardus). We modelled data in a spatially explicit capture-recapture framework, with both biotic and abiotic covariates hypothesised to influence density. We found that leopard density increased with distance to protected area boundary (mean±SE estimated effect = 0.44±0.20), a proxy for both protected area extent and distance from surrounding human settlements. We estimated mean density at 4.22 leopards/100 km2 (85% CI = 3.33‒5.35/100 km2), with no variation across habitat types. Results indicate that protected area extent and anthropogenic disturbance limit leopard populations whereas no support was found for prey availability and trap array as drivers of leopard density. Such vulnerability is relevant to the conservation of the leopard, which is generally considered more resilient to human disturbance than other large cats. Our findings support the notion that protected areas are important to preserve viable population of leopards, increasingly so in times of unprecedented habitat fragmentation. Protection of buffer zones smoothing the abrupt impact of human activities at reserve edges also appears of critical conservation relevance.
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209541
work_keys_str_mv AT rasmusworsøehavmøller reservesizeandanthropogenicdisturbanceaffectthedensityofanafricanleopardpantherapardusmetapopulation
AT simonetenan reservesizeandanthropogenicdisturbanceaffectthedensityofanafricanleopardpantherapardusmetapopulation
AT nikolajscharff reservesizeandanthropogenicdisturbanceaffectthedensityofanafricanleopardpantherapardusmetapopulation
AT francescorovero reservesizeandanthropogenicdisturbanceaffectthedensityofanafricanleopardpantherapardusmetapopulation
_version_ 1714821405939335168