How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?

When explaining organizational decision making, there is often an implicit assumption that an organization makes decisions based on rational principles. However, there are situations in which rationality cannot explain all phenomena. Moreover, even a single organizational decision can be subject to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kenichi KUWASHIMA
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Global Business Research Center 2014-08-01
Series:Annals of Business Administrative Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/13/4/13_215/_pdf/-char/en
id doaj-71d80fef5dee46d7b7cedcf9f594992d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71d80fef5dee46d7b7cedcf9f594992d2021-03-21T09:15:23ZengGlobal Business Research CenterAnnals of Business Administrative Science1347-44641347-44562014-08-0113421523010.7880/abas.13.215abasHow to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?Kenichi KUWASHIMA0Graduate School of Economics, University of TokyoWhen explaining organizational decision making, there is often an implicit assumption that an organization makes decisions based on rational principles. However, there are situations in which rationality cannot explain all phenomena. Moreover, even a single organizational decision can be subject to heterogeneous interpretations depending on the model used in an analysis. This paper examines the significance of the models of organizational decision making as an analytical framework by referencing classic studies by Allison (1971) and Lynn (1982). Allison (1971) and Lynn (1982) use multiple models to explain organizational decision making in an effective manner. However, the method in which they use these models differs. Allison (1971) analyzes the Cuban Missile Crisis using three models, and provides three different interpretations concerning decisions made by the U.S. and Soviet Union. In other words, Allison uses more than one model to analyze a single phenomenon to explain the event from different perspectives. On the other hand, Lynn (1892), who explains the decision-making process of Japanese and U.S. steelmakers by analyzing their adoption of new technology, chooses a single model for each company. In providing an analysis, Lynn compares several models and selects the one that is likely to have the most explanatory power. To provide an analysis of organizational decision making in an effective manner, it is necessary to remember the importance of models as an analytical framework and then decide whether to adopt Allison’s method (the use of multiple models that provide explanations from several perspectives) or Lynn’s method (an explanation using the most optimal model). It is important to decide which method to use based on the purpose of the analysis.https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/13/4/13_215/_pdf/-char/enorganizational decision makingmodern organization theory modelgarbage can model
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kenichi KUWASHIMA
spellingShingle Kenichi KUWASHIMA
How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
Annals of Business Administrative Science
organizational decision making
modern organization theory model
garbage can model
author_facet Kenichi KUWASHIMA
author_sort Kenichi KUWASHIMA
title How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
title_short How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
title_full How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
title_fullStr How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
title_full_unstemmed How to Use Models of Organizational Decision Making?
title_sort how to use models of organizational decision making?
publisher Global Business Research Center
series Annals of Business Administrative Science
issn 1347-4464
1347-4456
publishDate 2014-08-01
description When explaining organizational decision making, there is often an implicit assumption that an organization makes decisions based on rational principles. However, there are situations in which rationality cannot explain all phenomena. Moreover, even a single organizational decision can be subject to heterogeneous interpretations depending on the model used in an analysis. This paper examines the significance of the models of organizational decision making as an analytical framework by referencing classic studies by Allison (1971) and Lynn (1982). Allison (1971) and Lynn (1982) use multiple models to explain organizational decision making in an effective manner. However, the method in which they use these models differs. Allison (1971) analyzes the Cuban Missile Crisis using three models, and provides three different interpretations concerning decisions made by the U.S. and Soviet Union. In other words, Allison uses more than one model to analyze a single phenomenon to explain the event from different perspectives. On the other hand, Lynn (1892), who explains the decision-making process of Japanese and U.S. steelmakers by analyzing their adoption of new technology, chooses a single model for each company. In providing an analysis, Lynn compares several models and selects the one that is likely to have the most explanatory power. To provide an analysis of organizational decision making in an effective manner, it is necessary to remember the importance of models as an analytical framework and then decide whether to adopt Allison’s method (the use of multiple models that provide explanations from several perspectives) or Lynn’s method (an explanation using the most optimal model). It is important to decide which method to use based on the purpose of the analysis.
topic organizational decision making
modern organization theory model
garbage can model
url https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/abas/13/4/13_215/_pdf/-char/en
work_keys_str_mv AT kenichikuwashima howtousemodelsoforganizationaldecisionmaking
_version_ 1724211073022689280