Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria

Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate the quality, density and thickness of newly formed bone in experimental defects treated with Combi-Pack®, Bio-Oss® and Biostite®. Materials and Methods: Eight New Zealand white rabbits were included in this randomized,blinded study. Four equal...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M. Paknejad, AR. Rokn, B. Eslami, R. Afzalifar, A. Safiri
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2007-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/134
id doaj-71e47e0d2a374b70b8726f198b4f56e7
record_format Article
spelling doaj-71e47e0d2a374b70b8726f198b4f56e72020-11-25T03:27:54ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesFrontiers in Dentistry2676-296X2007-12-0144Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit CalvariaM. Paknejad0AR. Rokn1B. Eslami2R. Afzalifar3A. Safiri4Associate Professor, Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Tehran University of MedicalAssociate Professor, Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranAssociate Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Dental School of Shahid BeheshtDentist, Dental Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IranPeriodontist, Private PracticeObjective: The aim of present study was to evaluate the quality, density and thickness of newly formed bone in experimental defects treated with Combi-Pack®, Bio-Oss® and Biostite®. Materials and Methods: Eight New Zealand white rabbits were included in this randomized,blinded study. Four equal 3×6 mm bone defects were created on the frontal and parietal bones of each animal and three were immediately grafted with Bio-Oss®, Combi-Pack® and Biostite® while one was left untreated, serving as negative control. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis was performed four weeks after surgery. Results: Histomorphometric bone area and trabecular maturity was significantly higher in the Bio-Oss® and Combi-Pack® samples as compared to the Biostite® and control cases.The amount of remaining biomaterial was almost equal in the three experimental groups at the end of the study period. Neither foreign body reaction nor severe inflammation was seen in any of the specimens except for the Biostite® samples. Conclusion: It may be suggested that implantation of Bio-Oss® particles and Combi-Pack® blocks can promote bone regeneration more effectively than Biostite https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/134Bone regenerationBio-OssBiostite
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author M. Paknejad
AR. Rokn
B. Eslami
R. Afzalifar
A. Safiri
spellingShingle M. Paknejad
AR. Rokn
B. Eslami
R. Afzalifar
A. Safiri
Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
Frontiers in Dentistry
Bone regeneration
Bio-Oss
Biostite
author_facet M. Paknejad
AR. Rokn
B. Eslami
R. Afzalifar
A. Safiri
author_sort M. Paknejad
title Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
title_short Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
title_full Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
title_fullStr Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Three Bone Substitute Materials in the Treatment of Experimentally Induced Defects in Rabbit Calvaria
title_sort evaluation of three bone substitute materials in the treatment of experimentally induced defects in rabbit calvaria
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Frontiers in Dentistry
issn 2676-296X
publishDate 2007-12-01
description Objective: The aim of present study was to evaluate the quality, density and thickness of newly formed bone in experimental defects treated with Combi-Pack®, Bio-Oss® and Biostite®. Materials and Methods: Eight New Zealand white rabbits were included in this randomized,blinded study. Four equal 3×6 mm bone defects were created on the frontal and parietal bones of each animal and three were immediately grafted with Bio-Oss®, Combi-Pack® and Biostite® while one was left untreated, serving as negative control. Histologic and histomorphometric analysis was performed four weeks after surgery. Results: Histomorphometric bone area and trabecular maturity was significantly higher in the Bio-Oss® and Combi-Pack® samples as compared to the Biostite® and control cases.The amount of remaining biomaterial was almost equal in the three experimental groups at the end of the study period. Neither foreign body reaction nor severe inflammation was seen in any of the specimens except for the Biostite® samples. Conclusion: It may be suggested that implantation of Bio-Oss® particles and Combi-Pack® blocks can promote bone regeneration more effectively than Biostite
topic Bone regeneration
Bio-Oss
Biostite
url https://jdt.tums.ac.ir/index.php/jdt/article/view/134
work_keys_str_mv AT mpaknejad evaluationofthreebonesubstitutematerialsinthetreatmentofexperimentallyinduceddefectsinrabbitcalvaria
AT arrokn evaluationofthreebonesubstitutematerialsinthetreatmentofexperimentallyinduceddefectsinrabbitcalvaria
AT beslami evaluationofthreebonesubstitutematerialsinthetreatmentofexperimentallyinduceddefectsinrabbitcalvaria
AT rafzalifar evaluationofthreebonesubstitutematerialsinthetreatmentofexperimentallyinduceddefectsinrabbitcalvaria
AT asafiri evaluationofthreebonesubstitutematerialsinthetreatmentofexperimentallyinduceddefectsinrabbitcalvaria
_version_ 1724586554999963648