Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.

The reasons why some plant species were selected as crops and others were abandoned during the Neolithic emergence of agriculture are poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that the traits of Fertile Crescent crop progenitors were advantageous in the fertile, disturbed habitats surrounding earl...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Cunniff, Sarah Wilkinson, Michael Charles, Glynis Jones, Mark Rees, Colin P Osborne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24489941/pdf/?tool=EBI
id doaj-7235b1d6455d413aa92104590ad1126c
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7235b1d6455d413aa92104590ad1126c2021-03-03T20:16:34ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0191e8758610.1371/journal.pone.0087586Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.Jennifer CunniffSarah WilkinsonMichael CharlesGlynis JonesMark ReesColin P OsborneThe reasons why some plant species were selected as crops and others were abandoned during the Neolithic emergence of agriculture are poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that the traits of Fertile Crescent crop progenitors were advantageous in the fertile, disturbed habitats surrounding early settlements and in cultivated fields. We screened functional traits related to competition and disturbance in a group of grass species that were increasingly exploited by early plant gatherers, and that were later domesticated (crop progenitors); and in a set of grass species for which there is archaeological evidence of gathering, but which were never domesticated (wild species). We hypothesised that crop progenitors would have greater seed mass, growth rate, height and yield than wild species, as these traits are indicative of greater competitive ability, and that crop progenitors would be more resilient to defoliation. Our results show that crop progenitors have larger seed mass than wild species, germinate faster and have greater seedling size. Increased seed size is weakly but positively correlated with a higher growth rate, which is primarily driven by greater biomass assimilation per unit leaf area. Crop progenitors also tend to have a taller stature, greater grain yield and higher resilience to defoliation. Collectively, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that adaptations to competition and disturbance gave crop progenitors a selective advantage in the areas surrounding early human settlements and in cultivated environments, leading to their adoption as crops through processes of unconscious selection.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24489941/pdf/?tool=EBI
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Jennifer Cunniff
Sarah Wilkinson
Michael Charles
Glynis Jones
Mark Rees
Colin P Osborne
spellingShingle Jennifer Cunniff
Sarah Wilkinson
Michael Charles
Glynis Jones
Mark Rees
Colin P Osborne
Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Jennifer Cunniff
Sarah Wilkinson
Michael Charles
Glynis Jones
Mark Rees
Colin P Osborne
author_sort Jennifer Cunniff
title Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
title_short Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
title_full Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
title_fullStr Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
title_full_unstemmed Functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the Neolithic fertile crescent.
title_sort functional traits differ between cereal crop progenitors and other wild grasses gathered in the neolithic fertile crescent.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2014-01-01
description The reasons why some plant species were selected as crops and others were abandoned during the Neolithic emergence of agriculture are poorly understood. We tested the hypothesis that the traits of Fertile Crescent crop progenitors were advantageous in the fertile, disturbed habitats surrounding early settlements and in cultivated fields. We screened functional traits related to competition and disturbance in a group of grass species that were increasingly exploited by early plant gatherers, and that were later domesticated (crop progenitors); and in a set of grass species for which there is archaeological evidence of gathering, but which were never domesticated (wild species). We hypothesised that crop progenitors would have greater seed mass, growth rate, height and yield than wild species, as these traits are indicative of greater competitive ability, and that crop progenitors would be more resilient to defoliation. Our results show that crop progenitors have larger seed mass than wild species, germinate faster and have greater seedling size. Increased seed size is weakly but positively correlated with a higher growth rate, which is primarily driven by greater biomass assimilation per unit leaf area. Crop progenitors also tend to have a taller stature, greater grain yield and higher resilience to defoliation. Collectively, the data are consistent with the hypothesis that adaptations to competition and disturbance gave crop progenitors a selective advantage in the areas surrounding early human settlements and in cultivated environments, leading to their adoption as crops through processes of unconscious selection.
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/24489941/pdf/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT jennifercunniff functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
AT sarahwilkinson functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
AT michaelcharles functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
AT glynisjones functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
AT markrees functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
AT colinposborne functionaltraitsdifferbetweencerealcropprogenitorsandotherwildgrassesgatheredintheneolithicfertilecrescent
_version_ 1714823109064785920