What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?

The present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Giulia Lorenzoni, Rita Di Benedetto, Marco Silano, Dario Gregori
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Nutrients
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364
id doaj-723672d3ffc24e1aba35fd2c2f954941
record_format Article
spelling doaj-723672d3ffc24e1aba35fd2c2f9549412021-07-23T13:58:52ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-07-01132364236410.3390/nu13072364What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?Giulia Lorenzoni0Rita Di Benedetto1Marco Silano2Dario Gregori3Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, ItalyUnit of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Roma, ItalyUnit of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Roma, ItalyUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, ItalyThe present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by Italy, i.e., the NutrInform battery. The analysis was made in fourteen food product categories, corresponding to 124 foods. The application of the Nutriscore scheme showed that a significant proportion of foods (23%) were awarded an A or B. Furthermore, the analysis according to the MTL showed that food products that were above the threshold (“red”) for fat, saturated fats, sugars, and salt ranged from 13% to 31%. Interestingly, even though all foods considered in the analysis were UPF, they were heterogeneous in nutritional composition, as demonstrated by the FOPL schemes applied, showing that UPF represent a heterogeneous group of foods with different characteristics. Such a finding may have relevant implications for epidemiological studies that analyze the association between UPF consumption and health outcomes, suggesting the need for better characterization of the effects of UPF intake on human health.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364ultra-processed foodfront-of-pack labelingfood classification
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Giulia Lorenzoni
Rita Di Benedetto
Marco Silano
Dario Gregori
spellingShingle Giulia Lorenzoni
Rita Di Benedetto
Marco Silano
Dario Gregori
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
Nutrients
ultra-processed food
front-of-pack labeling
food classification
author_facet Giulia Lorenzoni
Rita Di Benedetto
Marco Silano
Dario Gregori
author_sort Giulia Lorenzoni
title What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
title_short What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
title_full What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
title_fullStr What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
title_full_unstemmed What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
title_sort what is the nutritional composition of ultra-processed food marketed in italy?
publisher MDPI AG
series Nutrients
issn 2072-6643
publishDate 2021-07-01
description The present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by Italy, i.e., the NutrInform battery. The analysis was made in fourteen food product categories, corresponding to 124 foods. The application of the Nutriscore scheme showed that a significant proportion of foods (23%) were awarded an A or B. Furthermore, the analysis according to the MTL showed that food products that were above the threshold (“red”) for fat, saturated fats, sugars, and salt ranged from 13% to 31%. Interestingly, even though all foods considered in the analysis were UPF, they were heterogeneous in nutritional composition, as demonstrated by the FOPL schemes applied, showing that UPF represent a heterogeneous group of foods with different characteristics. Such a finding may have relevant implications for epidemiological studies that analyze the association between UPF consumption and health outcomes, suggesting the need for better characterization of the effects of UPF intake on human health.
topic ultra-processed food
front-of-pack labeling
food classification
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364
work_keys_str_mv AT giulialorenzoni whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly
AT ritadibenedetto whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly
AT marcosilano whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly
AT dariogregori whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly
_version_ 1721286562467020800