What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?
The present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-07-01
|
Series: | Nutrients |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364 |
id |
doaj-723672d3ffc24e1aba35fd2c2f954941 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-723672d3ffc24e1aba35fd2c2f9549412021-07-23T13:58:52ZengMDPI AGNutrients2072-66432021-07-01132364236410.3390/nu13072364What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy?Giulia Lorenzoni0Rita Di Benedetto1Marco Silano2Dario Gregori3Unit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, ItalyUnit of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Roma, ItalyUnit of Human Nutrition and Health, Department of Food Safety, Nutrition and Veterinary Public Health, Italian National Institute of Health, 00161 Roma, ItalyUnit of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic, Vascular Sciences and Public Health, University of Padova, 35131 Padova, ItalyThe present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by Italy, i.e., the NutrInform battery. The analysis was made in fourteen food product categories, corresponding to 124 foods. The application of the Nutriscore scheme showed that a significant proportion of foods (23%) were awarded an A or B. Furthermore, the analysis according to the MTL showed that food products that were above the threshold (“red”) for fat, saturated fats, sugars, and salt ranged from 13% to 31%. Interestingly, even though all foods considered in the analysis were UPF, they were heterogeneous in nutritional composition, as demonstrated by the FOPL schemes applied, showing that UPF represent a heterogeneous group of foods with different characteristics. Such a finding may have relevant implications for epidemiological studies that analyze the association between UPF consumption and health outcomes, suggesting the need for better characterization of the effects of UPF intake on human health.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364ultra-processed foodfront-of-pack labelingfood classification |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Giulia Lorenzoni Rita Di Benedetto Marco Silano Dario Gregori |
spellingShingle |
Giulia Lorenzoni Rita Di Benedetto Marco Silano Dario Gregori What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? Nutrients ultra-processed food front-of-pack labeling food classification |
author_facet |
Giulia Lorenzoni Rita Di Benedetto Marco Silano Dario Gregori |
author_sort |
Giulia Lorenzoni |
title |
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? |
title_short |
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? |
title_full |
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? |
title_fullStr |
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? |
title_full_unstemmed |
What Is the Nutritional Composition of Ultra-Processed Food Marketed in Italy? |
title_sort |
what is the nutritional composition of ultra-processed food marketed in italy? |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Nutrients |
issn |
2072-6643 |
publishDate |
2021-07-01 |
description |
The present study aimed to provide a descriptive analysis of the nutrient profile of ultra-processed foods (UPFs) marketed in Italy according to three front-of-pack labeling (FOPL) schemes implemented by France, i.e., the Nutriscore; by the United Kingdom, i.e., Multiple Traffic Lights (MTL); and by Italy, i.e., the NutrInform battery. The analysis was made in fourteen food product categories, corresponding to 124 foods. The application of the Nutriscore scheme showed that a significant proportion of foods (23%) were awarded an A or B. Furthermore, the analysis according to the MTL showed that food products that were above the threshold (“red”) for fat, saturated fats, sugars, and salt ranged from 13% to 31%. Interestingly, even though all foods considered in the analysis were UPF, they were heterogeneous in nutritional composition, as demonstrated by the FOPL schemes applied, showing that UPF represent a heterogeneous group of foods with different characteristics. Such a finding may have relevant implications for epidemiological studies that analyze the association between UPF consumption and health outcomes, suggesting the need for better characterization of the effects of UPF intake on human health. |
topic |
ultra-processed food front-of-pack labeling food classification |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/13/7/2364 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT giulialorenzoni whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly AT ritadibenedetto whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly AT marcosilano whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly AT dariogregori whatisthenutritionalcompositionofultraprocessedfoodmarketedinitaly |
_version_ |
1721286562467020800 |