How many manuscripts should I peer review per year?
Peer review provides the foundation for the scholarly publishing system. The conventional peer review system consists of using authors of articles as reviewers for other colleagues’ manuscripts in a collaborative-basis system. However, authors complain about a theoretical overwhelming number of invi...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2020-03-01
|
Series: | Pharmacy Practice |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1804 |
id |
doaj-7239a438781c49dc8e3ece1e7f2b1e58 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-7239a438781c49dc8e3ece1e7f2b1e582020-11-25T02:59:27ZengCentro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones FarmaceuticasPharmacy Practice1885-642X1886-36552020-03-01181180410.18549/PharmPract.2020.1.1804 How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? Fernando Fernandez-Llimos https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8529-9595Teresa M. Salgadohttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-2708-7145Fernanda S. Tonin https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4262-8608Peer review provides the foundation for the scholarly publishing system. The conventional peer review system consists of using authors of articles as reviewers for other colleagues’ manuscripts in a collaborative-basis system. However, authors complain about a theoretical overwhelming number of invitations to peer review. It seems that authors feel that they are invited to review many more manuscripts than they should when taking into account their participation in the scholarly publishing system. The high number of scientific journals and the existence of predatory journals were reported as potential causes of this excessive number of reviews required. In this editorial, we demonstrate that the number of reviewers required to publish a given number of articles depends exclusively on the journals’ rejection rate and the number of reviewers intended per manuscript. Several initiatives to overcome the peer review crises are suggested.https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1804peer reviewresearchopen access publishingperiodicals as topic |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos Teresa M. Salgado Fernanda S. Tonin |
spellingShingle |
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos Teresa M. Salgado Fernanda S. Tonin How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? Pharmacy Practice peer review research open access publishing periodicals as topic |
author_facet |
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos Teresa M. Salgado Fernanda S. Tonin |
author_sort |
Fernando Fernandez-Llimos |
title |
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? |
title_short |
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? |
title_full |
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? |
title_fullStr |
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? |
title_full_unstemmed |
How many manuscripts should I peer review per year? |
title_sort |
how many manuscripts should i peer review per year? |
publisher |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas |
series |
Pharmacy Practice |
issn |
1885-642X 1886-3655 |
publishDate |
2020-03-01 |
description |
Peer review provides the foundation for the scholarly publishing system. The conventional peer review system consists of using authors of articles as reviewers for other colleagues’ manuscripts in a collaborative-basis system. However, authors complain about a theoretical overwhelming number of invitations to peer review. It seems that authors feel that they are invited to review many more manuscripts than they should when taking into account their participation in the scholarly publishing system. The high number of scientific journals and the existence of predatory journals were reported as potential causes of this excessive number of reviews required. In this editorial, we demonstrate that the number of reviewers required to publish a given number of articles depends exclusively on the journals’ rejection rate and the number of reviewers intended per manuscript. Several initiatives to overcome the peer review crises are suggested. |
topic |
peer review research open access publishing periodicals as topic |
url |
https://pharmacypractice.org/journal/index.php/pp/article/view/1804 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT fernandofernandezllimos howmanymanuscriptsshouldipeerreviewperyear AT teresamsalgado howmanymanuscriptsshouldipeerreviewperyear AT fernandastonin howmanymanuscriptsshouldipeerreviewperyear |
_version_ |
1724702332407513088 |