The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Purpose The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Leah Gandee, Jer-Tsong Hsieh, Vanessa Sperandio, Cristiano G. Moreira, Chih-Ho Lai, Philippe E. Zimmern
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia 2015-02-01
Series:International Brazilian Journal of Urology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100067&lng=en&tlng=en
id doaj-72a861f919264c6397ccdedb62ba56bb
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72a861f919264c6397ccdedb62ba56bb2020-11-24T21:29:44ZengSociedade Brasileira de UrologiaInternational Brazilian Journal of Urology1677-61192015-02-01411677710.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.01.10S1677-55382015000100067The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosaLeah GandeeJer-Tsong HsiehVanessa SperandioCristiano G. MoreiraChih-Ho LaiPhilippe E. ZimmernPurpose The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. Materials and Methods Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. Results The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. Conclusion When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100067&lng=en&tlng=enurinary tract infectionantibiotic therapybiofilm formationbacterial growth
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Leah Gandee
Jer-Tsong Hsieh
Vanessa Sperandio
Cristiano G. Moreira
Chih-Ho Lai
Philippe E. Zimmern
spellingShingle Leah Gandee
Jer-Tsong Hsieh
Vanessa Sperandio
Cristiano G. Moreira
Chih-Ho Lai
Philippe E. Zimmern
The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
International Brazilian Journal of Urology
urinary tract infection
antibiotic therapy
biofilm formation
bacterial growth
author_facet Leah Gandee
Jer-Tsong Hsieh
Vanessa Sperandio
Cristiano G. Moreira
Chih-Ho Lai
Philippe E. Zimmern
author_sort Leah Gandee
title The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_short The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_fullStr The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
title_sort efficacy of immediate versus delayed antibiotic administration on bacterial growth and biofilm production of selected strains of uropathogenic escherichia coli and pseudomonas aeruginosa
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
series International Brazilian Journal of Urology
issn 1677-6119
publishDate 2015-02-01
description Purpose The treatment of urinary tract infections (UTI) with antibiotics is commonly used, but recurrence and antibiotic resistance have been growing and concerning clinicians. We studied whether the rapid onset of a protective biofilm may be responsible for the lack of effectiveness of antibiotics against selected bacteria. Materials and Methods Two established uropathogenic Escherichia coli strains, UTI89 and CFT073, and two Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains, PA01 and Boston-41501, were studied to establish a reliable biofilm formation process. Bacterial growth (BG) was determined by optical density at 600 nm (OD 600) using a spectrophotometer, while biofilm formation (BF) using crystal violet staining was measured at OD 550. Next, these bacterial strains were treated with clinically relevant antibiotics, ciprofloxacin HCl (200 ng/mL and 2 μg/mL), nitrofurantoin (20 μg/mL and 40 μg/mL) and ampicillin (50 μg/mL) at time points of 0 (T0) or after 6 hours of culture (T6). All measurements, including controls (bacteria -1% DMSO), were done in triplicates and repeated three times for consistency. Results The tested antibiotics effectively inhibited both BG and BF when administered at T0 for UPEC strains, but not when the antibiotic administration started 6 hours later. For Pseudomonas strains, only Ciprofloxacin was able to significantly inhibit bacterial growth at T0 but only at the higher concentration of 2 μg/mL for T6. Conclusion When established UPEC and Pseudomonas bacteria were allowed to culture for 6 hours before initialization of treatment, the therapeutic effect of selected antibiotics was greatly suppressed when compared to immediate treatment, probably as a result of the protective nature of the biofilm.
topic urinary tract infection
antibiotic therapy
biofilm formation
bacterial growth
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382015000100067&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT leahgandee theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT jertsonghsieh theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT vanessasperandio theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT cristianogmoreira theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT chihholai theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT philippeezimmern theefficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT leahgandee efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT jertsonghsieh efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT vanessasperandio efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT cristianogmoreira efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT chihholai efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
AT philippeezimmern efficacyofimmediateversusdelayedantibioticadministrationonbacterialgrowthandbiofilmproductionofselectedstrainsofuropathogenicescherichiacoliandpseudomonasaeruginosa
_version_ 1725965929237446656