Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

Background: In multilevel arterial disease, whether complete revascularization or staged runoff repair should be performed remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iliac inflow repair and to identify clinical conditions that are associated with the need for runoff...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daijirou Akamatsu, Hitoshi Goto, Takashi Kamei, Shigehito Miyagi, Ken Tsuchida, Keiichiro Kawamura, Yuta Tajima, Michihisa Umetsu, Tetsuo Watanabe, Noriaki Ohuchi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-11-01
Series:Asian Journal of Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958416301762
id doaj-72b21502103d4b2980d024973a9aee97
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72b21502103d4b2980d024973a9aee972020-11-25T00:22:28ZengElsevierAsian Journal of Surgery1015-95842017-11-0140647548010.1016/j.asjsur.2016.07.004Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive diseaseDaijirou Akamatsu0Hitoshi Goto1Takashi Kamei2Shigehito Miyagi3Ken Tsuchida4Keiichiro Kawamura5Yuta Tajima6Michihisa Umetsu7Tetsuo Watanabe8Noriaki Ohuchi9Division of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanSendai City Hospital, Cardiovascular Surgery, 1-1 Nagamachi, Taihaku-ku Sendai, 982-8502, JapanDivision of Advanced Surgical Science and Technology, Graduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, 1-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku Sendai, 980-8574, JapanBackground: In multilevel arterial disease, whether complete revascularization or staged runoff repair should be performed remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iliac inflow repair and to identify clinical conditions that are associated with the need for runoff repair in concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease. Methods: Patients undergoing inflow repair for complicated flow-limiting iliac lesions with diffuse SFA disease between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with poor response to inflow repair underwent infrainguinal revascularization (IIR). Results: The 29 ischemic limbs examined in this study represent 26 different patients (22 males; mean age, 77 ± 8 years). Indications for inflow repair were Rutherford Classifications III (31%), IV (31%), V (31%), and VI (7%). Severity of the complicated SFA disease was either TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type C (14%) or type D (86%). Overall, freedom from IIR was 90% after 30 days and 83% after 1 year. Patients having claudication, rest pain, and shallow ischemic ulcers experienced the relief of symptoms, whereas patients with deep gangrene that needed minor amputation required IIR more frequently (p < 0.01). Anatomical risk factors for poor response to inflow repair were poor quality of the deep femoral artery (p < 0.01) and the flow-limiting popliteal artery (p = 0.02), and poor below-knee runoff (≤ 1 vessel, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Iliac inflow repair can reverse the symptoms in patients with multilevel arterial occlusive disease that are not associated with gangrenous toes.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958416301762iliac arteryinflow repairmultilevel arterial diseaseperipheral artery diseasesuperficial femoral artery
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Daijirou Akamatsu
Hitoshi Goto
Takashi Kamei
Shigehito Miyagi
Ken Tsuchida
Keiichiro Kawamura
Yuta Tajima
Michihisa Umetsu
Tetsuo Watanabe
Noriaki Ohuchi
spellingShingle Daijirou Akamatsu
Hitoshi Goto
Takashi Kamei
Shigehito Miyagi
Ken Tsuchida
Keiichiro Kawamura
Yuta Tajima
Michihisa Umetsu
Tetsuo Watanabe
Noriaki Ohuchi
Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
Asian Journal of Surgery
iliac artery
inflow repair
multilevel arterial disease
peripheral artery disease
superficial femoral artery
author_facet Daijirou Akamatsu
Hitoshi Goto
Takashi Kamei
Shigehito Miyagi
Ken Tsuchida
Keiichiro Kawamura
Yuta Tajima
Michihisa Umetsu
Tetsuo Watanabe
Noriaki Ohuchi
author_sort Daijirou Akamatsu
title Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
title_short Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
title_full Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
title_fullStr Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
title_sort efficacy of iliac inflow repair in patients with concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery occlusive disease
publisher Elsevier
series Asian Journal of Surgery
issn 1015-9584
publishDate 2017-11-01
description Background: In multilevel arterial disease, whether complete revascularization or staged runoff repair should be performed remains controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of iliac inflow repair and to identify clinical conditions that are associated with the need for runoff repair in concomitant iliac and superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease. Methods: Patients undergoing inflow repair for complicated flow-limiting iliac lesions with diffuse SFA disease between 2007 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with poor response to inflow repair underwent infrainguinal revascularization (IIR). Results: The 29 ischemic limbs examined in this study represent 26 different patients (22 males; mean age, 77 ± 8 years). Indications for inflow repair were Rutherford Classifications III (31%), IV (31%), V (31%), and VI (7%). Severity of the complicated SFA disease was either TASC (TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus) type C (14%) or type D (86%). Overall, freedom from IIR was 90% after 30 days and 83% after 1 year. Patients having claudication, rest pain, and shallow ischemic ulcers experienced the relief of symptoms, whereas patients with deep gangrene that needed minor amputation required IIR more frequently (p < 0.01). Anatomical risk factors for poor response to inflow repair were poor quality of the deep femoral artery (p < 0.01) and the flow-limiting popliteal artery (p = 0.02), and poor below-knee runoff (≤ 1 vessel, p < 0.01). Conclusion: Iliac inflow repair can reverse the symptoms in patients with multilevel arterial occlusive disease that are not associated with gangrenous toes.
topic iliac artery
inflow repair
multilevel arterial disease
peripheral artery disease
superficial femoral artery
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1015958416301762
work_keys_str_mv AT daijirouakamatsu efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT hitoshigoto efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT takashikamei efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT shigehitomiyagi efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT kentsuchida efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT keiichirokawamura efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT yutatajima efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT michihisaumetsu efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT tetsuowatanabe efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
AT noriakiohuchi efficacyofiliacinflowrepairinpatientswithconcomitantiliacandsuperficialfemoralarteryocclusivedisease
_version_ 1725359665475223552