Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Important methodological questions still exist concerning the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), including the possibility of a better way of interpreting it. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of an alter...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rihmer Zoltan, Gonda Xenia, Fountoulakis Konstantinos N, Fokas Costas, Iacovides Apostolos
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2008-11-01
Series:Annals of General Psychiatry
Online Access:http://www.annals-general-psychiatry.com/content/7/1/22
id doaj-72ed3ff25d5c4fce9a13c59b0db3b60b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-72ed3ff25d5c4fce9a13c59b0db3b60b2020-11-24T21:40:07ZengBMCAnnals of General Psychiatry1744-859X2008-11-01712210.1186/1744-859X-7-22Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory studyRihmer ZoltanGonda XeniaFountoulakis Konstantinos NFokas CostasIacovides Apostolos<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Important methodological questions still exist concerning the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), including the possibility of a better way of interpreting it. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of an alternative way of interpreting DST results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 50 patients with major depression aged 41.0 ± 11.4 years old participated in the study. Past and present suicide attempts were recorded. Psychometric assessment included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), the Newcastle Depression Diagnostic Scale (NDDS), the Diagnostic Melancholia Scale (DMS) and the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. The 1 mg DST protocol was used. Analysis methods included the chi square test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Fisher least significant difference (LSD) as post hoc tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In all, 34 patients (68%) were suppressors, 16 (32%) were non-suppressors and 14 patients had cortisol values above 5 μg/dl at baseline. Baseline cortisol level did not influence the classical DST interpretation. A total of 18 patients (36%) showed an increase of their cortisol levels after dexamethasone administration and 32 patients (64%) showed a decrease. Reducers had less melancholic features, similar levels of depression, better sleep and less suicidal thoughts in comparison to increasers. No relationship of DST to suicidality was found.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The present study explored the pattern of cortisol response to dexamethasone suppression and suggested an alternative way of coding and interpreting the DST on the basis of whether the cortisol levels remain stable or increase vs decrease after the administration of cortisol. The results put forward a complex way of understanding the relationship of the DST results with clinical symptoms.</p> http://www.annals-general-psychiatry.com/content/7/1/22
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rihmer Zoltan
Gonda Xenia
Fountoulakis Konstantinos N
Fokas Costas
Iacovides Apostolos
spellingShingle Rihmer Zoltan
Gonda Xenia
Fountoulakis Konstantinos N
Fokas Costas
Iacovides Apostolos
Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
Annals of General Psychiatry
author_facet Rihmer Zoltan
Gonda Xenia
Fountoulakis Konstantinos N
Fokas Costas
Iacovides Apostolos
author_sort Rihmer Zoltan
title Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
title_short Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
title_full Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
title_fullStr Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
title_full_unstemmed Revisiting the Dexamethasone Suppression Test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
title_sort revisiting the dexamethasone suppression test in unipolar major depression: an exploratory study
publisher BMC
series Annals of General Psychiatry
issn 1744-859X
publishDate 2008-11-01
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Important methodological questions still exist concerning the Dexamethasone Suppression Test (DST), including the possibility of a better way of interpreting it. The aim of the present study was to explore the feasibility of an alternative way of interpreting DST results.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>A total of 50 patients with major depression aged 41.0 ± 11.4 years old participated in the study. Past and present suicide attempts were recorded. Psychometric assessment included the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAS), the Newcastle Depression Diagnostic Scale (NDDS), the Diagnostic Melancholia Scale (DMS) and the General Assessment of Functioning (GAF) scale. The 1 mg DST protocol was used. Analysis methods included the chi square test and analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with Fisher least significant difference (LSD) as post hoc tests.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>In all, 34 patients (68%) were suppressors, 16 (32%) were non-suppressors and 14 patients had cortisol values above 5 μg/dl at baseline. Baseline cortisol level did not influence the classical DST interpretation. A total of 18 patients (36%) showed an increase of their cortisol levels after dexamethasone administration and 32 patients (64%) showed a decrease. Reducers had less melancholic features, similar levels of depression, better sleep and less suicidal thoughts in comparison to increasers. No relationship of DST to suicidality was found.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>The present study explored the pattern of cortisol response to dexamethasone suppression and suggested an alternative way of coding and interpreting the DST on the basis of whether the cortisol levels remain stable or increase vs decrease after the administration of cortisol. The results put forward a complex way of understanding the relationship of the DST results with clinical symptoms.</p>
url http://www.annals-general-psychiatry.com/content/7/1/22
work_keys_str_mv AT rihmerzoltan revisitingthedexamethasonesuppressiontestinunipolarmajordepressionanexploratorystudy
AT gondaxenia revisitingthedexamethasonesuppressiontestinunipolarmajordepressionanexploratorystudy
AT fountoulakiskonstantinosn revisitingthedexamethasonesuppressiontestinunipolarmajordepressionanexploratorystudy
AT fokascostas revisitingthedexamethasonesuppressiontestinunipolarmajordepressionanexploratorystudy
AT iacovidesapostolos revisitingthedexamethasonesuppressiontestinunipolarmajordepressionanexploratorystudy
_version_ 1725928048159621120