A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU

What was the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Brexit saga? And what will the impact of Brexit be over the future structure and activity of the CJEU? This article deals with this twofold question and explores three different issues. Firstly, we will offer a reflection...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marta Simoncini, Giuseppe Martinico
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2021-01-01
Series:Politics and Governance
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3660
id doaj-730e1f8008a54190aa02d88193ec688f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-730e1f8008a54190aa02d88193ec688f2021-01-27T10:45:11ZengCogitatioPolitics and Governance2183-24632021-01-0191273610.17645/pag.v9i1.36601841A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEUMarta Simoncini0Giuseppe Martinico1Department of Political Sciences, Luiss University, ItalyDIRPOLIS, Sant’Anna School of Advanced Studies, ItalyWhat was the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Brexit saga? And what will the impact of Brexit be over the future structure and activity of the CJEU? This article deals with this twofold question and explores three different issues. Firstly, we will offer a reflection on the questions and the risks raised by the Wightman case, where the CJEU ruled on the unilateral revocation of the UK notification of its intention to withdraw from the European Union under Art. 50 Treaty of the EU. Secondly, we will analyse the impact of Brexit on the composition of the CJEU and, particularly, the risks for the independence of the Court raised by the advanced termination of the mandate of the British Advocate General. Thirdly, we will provide some insights on the scope of the jurisdiction of the CJEU in the post-Brexit Union, emphasising how the Withdrawal Agreement maintained its jurisdiction during and even beyond the transition period. This article reflects the events that took place up to 6 October 2020.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3660advocate generalbrexitcourt of justice of the european unioneu lawinterpretationpost-brexit eu
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marta Simoncini
Giuseppe Martinico
spellingShingle Marta Simoncini
Giuseppe Martinico
A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
Politics and Governance
advocate general
brexit
court of justice of the european union
eu law
interpretation
post-brexit eu
author_facet Marta Simoncini
Giuseppe Martinico
author_sort Marta Simoncini
title A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
title_short A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
title_full A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
title_fullStr A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
title_full_unstemmed A Knot Not to Be Cut? The Legacy of Brexit over the CJEU
title_sort knot not to be cut? the legacy of brexit over the cjeu
publisher Cogitatio
series Politics and Governance
issn 2183-2463
publishDate 2021-01-01
description What was the role of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the Brexit saga? And what will the impact of Brexit be over the future structure and activity of the CJEU? This article deals with this twofold question and explores three different issues. Firstly, we will offer a reflection on the questions and the risks raised by the Wightman case, where the CJEU ruled on the unilateral revocation of the UK notification of its intention to withdraw from the European Union under Art. 50 Treaty of the EU. Secondly, we will analyse the impact of Brexit on the composition of the CJEU and, particularly, the risks for the independence of the Court raised by the advanced termination of the mandate of the British Advocate General. Thirdly, we will provide some insights on the scope of the jurisdiction of the CJEU in the post-Brexit Union, emphasising how the Withdrawal Agreement maintained its jurisdiction during and even beyond the transition period. This article reflects the events that took place up to 6 October 2020.
topic advocate general
brexit
court of justice of the european union
eu law
interpretation
post-brexit eu
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/3660
work_keys_str_mv AT martasimoncini aknotnottobecutthelegacyofbrexitoverthecjeu
AT giuseppemartinico aknotnottobecutthelegacyofbrexitoverthecjeu
AT martasimoncini knotnottobecutthelegacyofbrexitoverthecjeu
AT giuseppemartinico knotnottobecutthelegacyofbrexitoverthecjeu
_version_ 1724321507602071552