Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice

BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used widely for treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). In practical settings, evidence is lacking on the efficacy of ICIs in some difficult-to-treat patients, such as those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Herein, we evaluate the safety...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ming-Chun Kuo, Po-Jung Su, Chun-Chieh Huang, Hao-Lun Luo, Tai-Jan Chiu, Shau-Hsuan Li, Chia-Che Wu, Ting-Ting Liu, Yuan-Tso Cheng, Chih-Hsiung Kang, Yu-Li Su
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-11-01
Series:Frontiers in Oncology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.584834/full
id doaj-7362a60ed75a425ca16c8c2ae2a52175
record_format Article
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Ming-Chun Kuo
Po-Jung Su
Chun-Chieh Huang
Hao-Lun Luo
Tai-Jan Chiu
Shau-Hsuan Li
Chia-Che Wu
Ting-Ting Liu
Yuan-Tso Cheng
Chih-Hsiung Kang
Yu-Li Su
Yu-Li Su
spellingShingle Ming-Chun Kuo
Po-Jung Su
Chun-Chieh Huang
Hao-Lun Luo
Tai-Jan Chiu
Shau-Hsuan Li
Chia-Che Wu
Ting-Ting Liu
Yuan-Tso Cheng
Chih-Hsiung Kang
Yu-Li Su
Yu-Li Su
Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
Frontiers in Oncology
immune checkpoint inhibitor
end-stage renal disease
metastatic urothelial carcinoma
safety
survival
author_facet Ming-Chun Kuo
Po-Jung Su
Chun-Chieh Huang
Hao-Lun Luo
Tai-Jan Chiu
Shau-Hsuan Li
Chia-Che Wu
Ting-Ting Liu
Yuan-Tso Cheng
Chih-Hsiung Kang
Yu-Li Su
Yu-Li Su
author_sort Ming-Chun Kuo
title Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
title_short Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
title_full Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
title_fullStr Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
title_full_unstemmed Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World Practice
title_sort safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and end-stage renal disease: experiences from real-world practice
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
series Frontiers in Oncology
issn 2234-943X
publishDate 2020-11-01
description BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used widely for treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). In practical settings, evidence is lacking on the efficacy of ICIs in some difficult-to-treat patients, such as those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Herein, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs for patients with mUC and ESRD.MethodsFor this retrospective study, patients with mUC who were given ICIs at Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital and Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between April 2016 and November 2019 were consecutively enrolled. All clinicopathologic data, treatment responses, and adverse events were recorded. The immune-related adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between ESRD and non-ESRD groups.ResultsIn total, 129 patients with mUC were enrolled, with 11 patients categorized as the ESRD group. Among these patients with ESRD receiving ICIs, 7 of 11 (63.6%) had high-grade (grade ≥3) AEs, chiefly hematologic toxicity. Some rarely encountered AEs were noted, including toxic epidermal necrolysis, tuberculosis reactivation, ascites, and cytokine release syndrome. Patients in the ESRD group had numerically higher ORR (54.5% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.09), PFS (7.1 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.42), and OS (not reached vs. 15.4 months) than the non-ESRD group. A multivariate Cox regression model demonstrated that leukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23–5.63; p = 0.01) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR 2.91; 95% CI: 1.30–6.53; p = 0.01) were independent prognostic factors.ConclusionAdministration of ICIs in patients with mUC and ESRD demonstrated a modest antitumor activity, and should be used with caution for increasing risk of hematologic toxicity.
topic immune checkpoint inhibitor
end-stage renal disease
metastatic urothelial carcinoma
safety
survival
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.584834/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mingchunkuo safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT pojungsu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT chunchiehhuang safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT haolunluo safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT taijanchiu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT shauhsuanli safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT chiachewu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT tingtingliu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT yuantsocheng safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT chihhsiungkang safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT yulisu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
AT yulisu safetyandefficacyofimmunecheckpointinhibitorsforpatientswithmetastaticurothelialcarcinomaandendstagerenaldiseaseexperiencesfromrealworldpractice
_version_ 1724390411858870272
spelling doaj-7362a60ed75a425ca16c8c2ae2a521752020-12-08T08:40:56ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2020-11-011010.3389/fonc.2020.584834584834Safety and Efficacy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Patients With Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma and End-Stage Renal Disease: Experiences From Real-World PracticeMing-Chun Kuo0Po-Jung Su1Chun-Chieh Huang2Hao-Lun Luo3Tai-Jan Chiu4Shau-Hsuan Li5Chia-Che Wu6Ting-Ting Liu7Yuan-Tso Cheng8Chih-Hsiung Kang9Yu-Li Su10Yu-Li Su11Division of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDivision of Hematology Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Tao-Yuan, TaiwanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Pathology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDepartment of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanDivision of Hematology Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung, TaiwanClinical Trial Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, TaiwanBackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are used widely for treating metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC). In practical settings, evidence is lacking on the efficacy of ICIs in some difficult-to-treat patients, such as those with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Herein, we evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs for patients with mUC and ESRD.MethodsFor this retrospective study, patients with mUC who were given ICIs at Kaohsiung Chang Gang Memorial Hospital and Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital between April 2016 and November 2019 were consecutively enrolled. All clinicopathologic data, treatment responses, and adverse events were recorded. The immune-related adverse events (AEs), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between ESRD and non-ESRD groups.ResultsIn total, 129 patients with mUC were enrolled, with 11 patients categorized as the ESRD group. Among these patients with ESRD receiving ICIs, 7 of 11 (63.6%) had high-grade (grade ≥3) AEs, chiefly hematologic toxicity. Some rarely encountered AEs were noted, including toxic epidermal necrolysis, tuberculosis reactivation, ascites, and cytokine release syndrome. Patients in the ESRD group had numerically higher ORR (54.5% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.09), PFS (7.1 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.42), and OS (not reached vs. 15.4 months) than the non-ESRD group. A multivariate Cox regression model demonstrated that leukocytosis (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.23–5.63; p = 0.01) and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (HR 2.91; 95% CI: 1.30–6.53; p = 0.01) were independent prognostic factors.ConclusionAdministration of ICIs in patients with mUC and ESRD demonstrated a modest antitumor activity, and should be used with caution for increasing risk of hematologic toxicity.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2020.584834/fullimmune checkpoint inhibitorend-stage renal diseasemetastatic urothelial carcinomasafetysurvival