Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry

Objective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Francesco Burzotta, Giulio Russo, Flavio Ribichini, Anna Piccoli, Domenico D’Amario, Lazzaro Paraggio, Leonardo Previ, Gabriele Pesarini, Italo Porto, Antonio Maria Leone, Giampaolo Niccoli, Cristina Aurigemma, Diana Verdirosi, Filippo Crea, Carlo Trani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Hindawi-Wiley 2019-01-01
Series:Journal of Interventional Cardiology
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913
id doaj-73698169536145d88a7bfaae58434a7a
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73698169536145d88a7bfaae58434a7a2020-11-24T21:50:08ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/52439135243913Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona RegistryFrancesco Burzotta0Giulio Russo1Flavio Ribichini2Anna Piccoli3Domenico D’Amario4Lazzaro Paraggio5Leonardo Previ6Gabriele Pesarini7Italo Porto8Antonio Maria Leone9Giampaolo Niccoli10Cristina Aurigemma11Diana Verdirosi12Filippo Crea13Carlo Trani14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyObjective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact of more complete revascularization during Impella-protected PCI in CHIP has not been reported. Methods. A total of 86 CHIP undergoing elective PCI with Impella 2.5 or Impella CP between April 2007 and December 2016 from 2 high volume Italian centers were included. Baseline, procedural, and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively. Completeness of coronary revascularization was assessed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society myocardial jeopardy score (BCIS-JS) derived revascularization index (RI). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. Results. All patients had multivessel disease and were considered unsuitable for surgery. At baseline, 44% had left main disease, 78% had LVEF ≤ 35%, and mean BCIS-JS score was 10±2. The mean BCIS-JS derived RI was 0.7±0.2 and procedural complications were uncommon. At 14-month follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.5%. At follow-up, 67.4% of CHIP had LVEF ≥ 35% compared to 22.1% before Impella protected-PCI. Higher BCIS-JS RI was significantly associated with LVEF improvement (p=0.002). BCIS-JS RI of ≤ 0.8 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01- 0.92, and p = 0.042) was an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions. These results support the practice of percutaneous Impella use for protected PCI in CHIP. A more complete revascularization was associated with significant LVEF improvement and survival.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Francesco Burzotta
Giulio Russo
Flavio Ribichini
Anna Piccoli
Domenico D’Amario
Lazzaro Paraggio
Leonardo Previ
Gabriele Pesarini
Italo Porto
Antonio Maria Leone
Giampaolo Niccoli
Cristina Aurigemma
Diana Verdirosi
Filippo Crea
Carlo Trani
spellingShingle Francesco Burzotta
Giulio Russo
Flavio Ribichini
Anna Piccoli
Domenico D’Amario
Lazzaro Paraggio
Leonardo Previ
Gabriele Pesarini
Italo Porto
Antonio Maria Leone
Giampaolo Niccoli
Cristina Aurigemma
Diana Verdirosi
Filippo Crea
Carlo Trani
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
Journal of Interventional Cardiology
author_facet Francesco Burzotta
Giulio Russo
Flavio Ribichini
Anna Piccoli
Domenico D’Amario
Lazzaro Paraggio
Leonardo Previ
Gabriele Pesarini
Italo Porto
Antonio Maria Leone
Giampaolo Niccoli
Cristina Aurigemma
Diana Verdirosi
Filippo Crea
Carlo Trani
author_sort Francesco Burzotta
title Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
title_short Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
title_full Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
title_fullStr Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
title_full_unstemmed Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
title_sort long-term outcomes of extent of revascularization in complex high risk and indicated patients undergoing impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention: report from the roma-verona registry
publisher Hindawi-Wiley
series Journal of Interventional Cardiology
issn 0896-4327
1540-8183
publishDate 2019-01-01
description Objective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact of more complete revascularization during Impella-protected PCI in CHIP has not been reported. Methods. A total of 86 CHIP undergoing elective PCI with Impella 2.5 or Impella CP between April 2007 and December 2016 from 2 high volume Italian centers were included. Baseline, procedural, and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively. Completeness of coronary revascularization was assessed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society myocardial jeopardy score (BCIS-JS) derived revascularization index (RI). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. Results. All patients had multivessel disease and were considered unsuitable for surgery. At baseline, 44% had left main disease, 78% had LVEF ≤ 35%, and mean BCIS-JS score was 10±2. The mean BCIS-JS derived RI was 0.7±0.2 and procedural complications were uncommon. At 14-month follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.5%. At follow-up, 67.4% of CHIP had LVEF ≥ 35% compared to 22.1% before Impella protected-PCI. Higher BCIS-JS RI was significantly associated with LVEF improvement (p=0.002). BCIS-JS RI of ≤ 0.8 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01- 0.92, and p = 0.042) was an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions. These results support the practice of percutaneous Impella use for protected PCI in CHIP. A more complete revascularization was associated with significant LVEF improvement and survival.
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913
work_keys_str_mv AT francescoburzotta longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT giuliorusso longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT flavioribichini longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT annapiccoli longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT domenicodamario longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT lazzaroparaggio longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT leonardoprevi longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT gabrielepesarini longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT italoporto longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT antoniomarialeone longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT giampaoloniccoli longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT cristinaaurigemma longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT dianaverdirosi longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT filippocrea longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
AT carlotrani longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry
_version_ 1725885085577641984