Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry
Objective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Hindawi-Wiley
2019-01-01
|
Series: | Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913 |
id |
doaj-73698169536145d88a7bfaae58434a7a |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73698169536145d88a7bfaae58434a7a2020-11-24T21:50:08ZengHindawi-WileyJournal of Interventional Cardiology0896-43271540-81832019-01-01201910.1155/2019/52439135243913Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona RegistryFrancesco Burzotta0Giulio Russo1Flavio Ribichini2Anna Piccoli3Domenico D’Amario4Lazzaro Paraggio5Leonardo Previ6Gabriele Pesarini7Italo Porto8Antonio Maria Leone9Giampaolo Niccoli10Cristina Aurigemma11Diana Verdirosi12Filippo Crea13Carlo Trani14Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyFondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, ItalyObjective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact of more complete revascularization during Impella-protected PCI in CHIP has not been reported. Methods. A total of 86 CHIP undergoing elective PCI with Impella 2.5 or Impella CP between April 2007 and December 2016 from 2 high volume Italian centers were included. Baseline, procedural, and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively. Completeness of coronary revascularization was assessed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society myocardial jeopardy score (BCIS-JS) derived revascularization index (RI). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. Results. All patients had multivessel disease and were considered unsuitable for surgery. At baseline, 44% had left main disease, 78% had LVEF ≤ 35%, and mean BCIS-JS score was 10±2. The mean BCIS-JS derived RI was 0.7±0.2 and procedural complications were uncommon. At 14-month follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.5%. At follow-up, 67.4% of CHIP had LVEF ≥ 35% compared to 22.1% before Impella protected-PCI. Higher BCIS-JS RI was significantly associated with LVEF improvement (p=0.002). BCIS-JS RI of ≤ 0.8 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01- 0.92, and p = 0.042) was an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions. These results support the practice of percutaneous Impella use for protected PCI in CHIP. A more complete revascularization was associated with significant LVEF improvement and survival.http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913 |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Francesco Burzotta Giulio Russo Flavio Ribichini Anna Piccoli Domenico D’Amario Lazzaro Paraggio Leonardo Previ Gabriele Pesarini Italo Porto Antonio Maria Leone Giampaolo Niccoli Cristina Aurigemma Diana Verdirosi Filippo Crea Carlo Trani |
spellingShingle |
Francesco Burzotta Giulio Russo Flavio Ribichini Anna Piccoli Domenico D’Amario Lazzaro Paraggio Leonardo Previ Gabriele Pesarini Italo Porto Antonio Maria Leone Giampaolo Niccoli Cristina Aurigemma Diana Verdirosi Filippo Crea Carlo Trani Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
author_facet |
Francesco Burzotta Giulio Russo Flavio Ribichini Anna Piccoli Domenico D’Amario Lazzaro Paraggio Leonardo Previ Gabriele Pesarini Italo Porto Antonio Maria Leone Giampaolo Niccoli Cristina Aurigemma Diana Verdirosi Filippo Crea Carlo Trani |
author_sort |
Francesco Burzotta |
title |
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry |
title_short |
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry |
title_full |
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry |
title_fullStr |
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry |
title_full_unstemmed |
Long-Term Outcomes of Extent of Revascularization in Complex High Risk and Indicated Patients Undergoing Impella-Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Report from the Roma-Verona Registry |
title_sort |
long-term outcomes of extent of revascularization in complex high risk and indicated patients undergoing impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention: report from the roma-verona registry |
publisher |
Hindawi-Wiley |
series |
Journal of Interventional Cardiology |
issn |
0896-4327 1540-8183 |
publishDate |
2019-01-01 |
description |
Objective. To investigate the effect of extent of revascularization in complex high-risk indicated patients (CHIP) undergoing Impella-protected percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Background. Complete revascularization has been shown to be associated with improved outcomes. However, the impact of more complete revascularization during Impella-protected PCI in CHIP has not been reported. Methods. A total of 86 CHIP undergoing elective PCI with Impella 2.5 or Impella CP between April 2007 and December 2016 from 2 high volume Italian centers were included. Baseline, procedural, and clinical outcomes data were collected retrospectively. Completeness of coronary revascularization was assessed using the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society myocardial jeopardy score (BCIS-JS) derived revascularization index (RI). The primary end-point was all-cause mortality. A multivariate regression model was used to identify independent predictors of mortality. Results. All patients had multivessel disease and were considered unsuitable for surgery. At baseline, 44% had left main disease, 78% had LVEF ≤ 35%, and mean BCIS-JS score was 10±2. The mean BCIS-JS derived RI was 0.7±0.2 and procedural complications were uncommon. At 14-month follow-up, all-cause mortality was 10.5%. At follow-up, 67.4% of CHIP had LVEF ≥ 35% compared to 22.1% before Impella protected-PCI. Higher BCIS-JS RI was significantly associated with LVEF improvement (p=0.002). BCIS-JS RI of ≤ 0.8 (HR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01- 0.92, and p = 0.042) was an independent predictor of mortality. Conclusions. These results support the practice of percutaneous Impella use for protected PCI in CHIP. A more complete revascularization was associated with significant LVEF improvement and survival. |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2019/5243913 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT francescoburzotta longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT giuliorusso longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT flavioribichini longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT annapiccoli longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT domenicodamario longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT lazzaroparaggio longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT leonardoprevi longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT gabrielepesarini longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT italoporto longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT antoniomarialeone longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT giampaoloniccoli longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT cristinaaurigemma longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT dianaverdirosi longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT filippocrea longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry AT carlotrani longtermoutcomesofextentofrevascularizationincomplexhighriskandindicatedpatientsundergoingimpellaprotectedpercutaneouscoronaryinterventionreportfromtheromaveronaregistry |
_version_ |
1725885085577641984 |