A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess whether there were differences in the outcomes between tenotomy and tenodesis in treating LHBT lesions combined with rotator cuff repairs.Using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, we searched for articles comparing tenotomy and tenodesis combined with rotat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiliang Shang, Jiwu Chen, Shiyi Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5633150?pdf=render
id doaj-7394f00ba8c244abacd462a69a8d8b55
record_format Article
spelling doaj-7394f00ba8c244abacd462a69a8d8b552020-11-24T21:27:22ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-011210e018578810.1371/journal.pone.0185788A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.Xiliang ShangJiwu ChenShiyi ChenThe purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess whether there were differences in the outcomes between tenotomy and tenodesis in treating LHBT lesions combined with rotator cuff repairs.Using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, we searched for articles comparing tenotomy and tenodesis combined with rotator cuff repair which were published before April 2016 with the terms "biceps", "tenotomy", "tenodesis", and "rotator cuff". The controlled clinical studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed for quality of methodology by utilizing the Coleman score.On the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, ten articles (903 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The Coleman score ranged between 40 and 89 in the included studies. The results showed that the incidence of the popeye sign (OR, 2.777, P = 0.000) were higher in tenotomy group compared with tenodesis group when concomitant rotator cuff repair. Statistically significant difference in favor of tenodesis was observed for Constant score (SMD, -0.230, P = 0.025). As for the arm cramping pain, patient satisfaction, VAS score, ASES score and UCLA increased score, the strength and the range of motion, there were no significant differences between tenodesis and tenotomy of the LHBT, corresponding to the currently available results in the literature.Based on this meta-analysis, both tenotomy and tenodesis are effective in pain relief and function improvement in patients with repairable rotator cuff tears. No significant differences in post-operative functional outcome between tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of LHBT lesions were observed except for a lower Constant score and higher risk of Popeye deformity in tenotomy.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5633150?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xiliang Shang
Jiwu Chen
Shiyi Chen
spellingShingle Xiliang Shang
Jiwu Chen
Shiyi Chen
A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Xiliang Shang
Jiwu Chen
Shiyi Chen
author_sort Xiliang Shang
title A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
title_short A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
title_full A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
title_fullStr A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
title_full_unstemmed A meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
title_sort meta-analysis comparing tenotomy and tenodesis for treating rotator cuff tears combined with long head of the biceps tendon lesions.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess whether there were differences in the outcomes between tenotomy and tenodesis in treating LHBT lesions combined with rotator cuff repairs.Using Medline, Embase, and Cochrane, we searched for articles comparing tenotomy and tenodesis combined with rotator cuff repair which were published before April 2016 with the terms "biceps", "tenotomy", "tenodesis", and "rotator cuff". The controlled clinical studies that met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed for quality of methodology by utilizing the Coleman score.On the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, ten articles (903 patients) were included in this meta-analysis. The Coleman score ranged between 40 and 89 in the included studies. The results showed that the incidence of the popeye sign (OR, 2.777, P = 0.000) were higher in tenotomy group compared with tenodesis group when concomitant rotator cuff repair. Statistically significant difference in favor of tenodesis was observed for Constant score (SMD, -0.230, P = 0.025). As for the arm cramping pain, patient satisfaction, VAS score, ASES score and UCLA increased score, the strength and the range of motion, there were no significant differences between tenodesis and tenotomy of the LHBT, corresponding to the currently available results in the literature.Based on this meta-analysis, both tenotomy and tenodesis are effective in pain relief and function improvement in patients with repairable rotator cuff tears. No significant differences in post-operative functional outcome between tenotomy and tenodesis for the treatment of LHBT lesions were observed except for a lower Constant score and higher risk of Popeye deformity in tenotomy.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5633150?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT xiliangshang ametaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
AT jiwuchen ametaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
AT shiyichen ametaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
AT xiliangshang metaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
AT jiwuchen metaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
AT shiyichen metaanalysiscomparingtenotomyandtenodesisfortreatingrotatorcufftearscombinedwithlongheadofthebicepstendonlesions
_version_ 1725975045454430208