Quality Uncertainty Erodes Trust in Science
When consumers of science (readers and reviewers) lack relevant details about the study design, data, and analyses, they cannot adequately evaluate the strength of a scientific study. Lack of transparency is common in science, and is encouraged by journals that place more emphasis on the aesthetic a...
Main Author: | Simine Vazire |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of California Press
2017-02-01
|
Series: | Collabra: Psychology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.collabra.org/articles/74 |
Similar Items
-
Preregistration of Analyses of Preexisting Data
by: Gaëtan Mertens, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Improving Trust in Research: Supporting Claims with Evidence
by: Wright Daniel B.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
A Practical Guide for Transparency in Psychological Science
by: Olivier Klein, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Seven Reasons Why: A User’s Guide to Transparency and Reproducibility
by: Dalson Figueiredo Filho, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01) -
Replication, Uncertainty and Progress in Comparative Cognition
by: Alexandria Boyle
Published: (2021-05-01)