Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system

Abstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following per...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kees van Goeverden, Dimitris Milakis, Milan Janic, Rob Konings
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-09-01
Series:European Transport Research Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-x
id doaj-73c382410a6d4afbb8c467c02b87f27b
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73c382410a6d4afbb8c467c02b87f27b2020-11-24T21:50:04ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Transport Research Review1867-07171866-88872018-09-0110211710.1186/s12544-018-0312-xAnalysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport systemKees van Goeverden0Dimitris Milakis1Milan Janic2Rob Konings3Transport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyTransport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyTransport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyOTB, Research for the Built Environment, Delft University of TechnologyAbstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following performances of the HL system are analytically modeled and compared to HSR and APT: (i) operational performance; (ii) financial performance; (iii) social/environmental performance. Results The main operational result is that the capacity of HL is low which implies a low utilization of the infrastructure. Because the infrastructure costs dominate the total costs, the costs per passenger km are high compared to those for HSR and APT. The HL performs very well regarding the social/environmental aspects because of low energy use, no GHG emissions and hardly any noise. The safety performance needs further consideration. Conclusions The HL system is promising for relieving the environmental pressure of long-distance travelling, but has disadvantages regarding the operational and financial performances.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-xHL (Hyperloop) systemPerformancesLong-distance transportModellingEstimation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kees van Goeverden
Dimitris Milakis
Milan Janic
Rob Konings
spellingShingle Kees van Goeverden
Dimitris Milakis
Milan Janic
Rob Konings
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
European Transport Research Review
HL (Hyperloop) system
Performances
Long-distance transport
Modelling
Estimation
author_facet Kees van Goeverden
Dimitris Milakis
Milan Janic
Rob Konings
author_sort Kees van Goeverden
title Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
title_short Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
title_full Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
title_fullStr Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
title_full_unstemmed Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
title_sort analysis and modelling of performances of the hl (hyperloop) transport system
publisher SpringerOpen
series European Transport Research Review
issn 1867-0717
1866-8887
publishDate 2018-09-01
description Abstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following performances of the HL system are analytically modeled and compared to HSR and APT: (i) operational performance; (ii) financial performance; (iii) social/environmental performance. Results The main operational result is that the capacity of HL is low which implies a low utilization of the infrastructure. Because the infrastructure costs dominate the total costs, the costs per passenger km are high compared to those for HSR and APT. The HL performs very well regarding the social/environmental aspects because of low energy use, no GHG emissions and hardly any noise. The safety performance needs further consideration. Conclusions The HL system is promising for relieving the environmental pressure of long-distance travelling, but has disadvantages regarding the operational and financial performances.
topic HL (Hyperloop) system
Performances
Long-distance transport
Modelling
Estimation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-x
work_keys_str_mv AT keesvangoeverden analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem
AT dimitrismilakis analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem
AT milanjanic analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem
AT robkonings analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem
_version_ 1725885521695080448