Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system
Abstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following per...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2018-09-01
|
Series: | European Transport Research Review |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-x |
id |
doaj-73c382410a6d4afbb8c467c02b87f27b |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-73c382410a6d4afbb8c467c02b87f27b2020-11-24T21:50:04ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Transport Research Review1867-07171866-88872018-09-0110211710.1186/s12544-018-0312-xAnalysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport systemKees van Goeverden0Dimitris Milakis1Milan Janic2Rob Konings3Transport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyTransport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyTransport & Planning Department, Delft University of TechnologyOTB, Research for the Built Environment, Delft University of TechnologyAbstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following performances of the HL system are analytically modeled and compared to HSR and APT: (i) operational performance; (ii) financial performance; (iii) social/environmental performance. Results The main operational result is that the capacity of HL is low which implies a low utilization of the infrastructure. Because the infrastructure costs dominate the total costs, the costs per passenger km are high compared to those for HSR and APT. The HL performs very well regarding the social/environmental aspects because of low energy use, no GHG emissions and hardly any noise. The safety performance needs further consideration. Conclusions The HL system is promising for relieving the environmental pressure of long-distance travelling, but has disadvantages regarding the operational and financial performances.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-xHL (Hyperloop) systemPerformancesLong-distance transportModellingEstimation |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Kees van Goeverden Dimitris Milakis Milan Janic Rob Konings |
spellingShingle |
Kees van Goeverden Dimitris Milakis Milan Janic Rob Konings Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system European Transport Research Review HL (Hyperloop) system Performances Long-distance transport Modelling Estimation |
author_facet |
Kees van Goeverden Dimitris Milakis Milan Janic Rob Konings |
author_sort |
Kees van Goeverden |
title |
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system |
title_short |
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system |
title_full |
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system |
title_fullStr |
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system |
title_full_unstemmed |
Analysis and modelling of performances of the HL (Hyperloop) transport system |
title_sort |
analysis and modelling of performances of the hl (hyperloop) transport system |
publisher |
SpringerOpen |
series |
European Transport Research Review |
issn |
1867-0717 1866-8887 |
publishDate |
2018-09-01 |
description |
Abstract Introduction Hyperloop (HL) is presented as an efficient alternative of HSR (High Speed Rail) and APT (Air Passenger Transport) systems for long-distance passenger transport. This paper explores the performances of HL and compares these performances to HSR and APT. Methods The following performances of the HL system are analytically modeled and compared to HSR and APT: (i) operational performance; (ii) financial performance; (iii) social/environmental performance. Results The main operational result is that the capacity of HL is low which implies a low utilization of the infrastructure. Because the infrastructure costs dominate the total costs, the costs per passenger km are high compared to those for HSR and APT. The HL performs very well regarding the social/environmental aspects because of low energy use, no GHG emissions and hardly any noise. The safety performance needs further consideration. Conclusions The HL system is promising for relieving the environmental pressure of long-distance travelling, but has disadvantages regarding the operational and financial performances. |
topic |
HL (Hyperloop) system Performances Long-distance transport Modelling Estimation |
url |
http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0312-x |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT keesvangoeverden analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem AT dimitrismilakis analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem AT milanjanic analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem AT robkonings analysisandmodellingofperformancesofthehlhyperlooptransportsystem |
_version_ |
1725885521695080448 |