Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites

Polar CAMMICE MICS proton pitch angle distributions with energies of 31-80 keV were analyzed to determine the locations where anisotropic pitch angle distributions (perpendicular flux dominating) change to isotropic distributions. We compared the positions of these mid-altitude isotropic distri...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: N. Yu. Ganushkina, T. I. Pulkkinen, M. V. Kubyshkina, V. A. Sergeev, E. A. Lvova, T. A. Yahnina, A. G. Yahnin, T. Fritz
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2005-07-01
Series:Annales Geophysicae
Online Access:https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1839/2005/angeo-23-1839-2005.pdf
id doaj-73d0b403e4c34d5cb45e0130e2962563
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73d0b403e4c34d5cb45e0130e29625632020-11-25T02:27:14ZengCopernicus PublicationsAnnales Geophysicae0992-76891432-05762005-07-01231839184710.5194/angeo-23-1839-2005Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellitesN. Yu. Ganushkina0T. I. Pulkkinen1M. V. Kubyshkina2V. A. Sergeev3E. A. Lvova4T. A. Yahnina5A. G. Yahnin6T. Fritz7Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research Division, FIN-00101 Helsinki, FinlandFinnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research Division, FIN-00101 Helsinki, FinlandInstitute of Physics, University of St.-Petersburg, St.-Petersburg, 198904, RussiaInstitute of Physics, University of St.-Petersburg, St.-Petersburg, 198904, RussiaInstitute of Physics, University of St.-Petersburg, St.-Petersburg, 198904, RussiaPolar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184200, RussiaPolar Geophysical Institute, Apatity, Murmansk region, 184200, RussiaBoston University, Department of Astronomy, Boston, MA 02215, USAPolar CAMMICE MICS proton pitch angle distributions with energies of 31-80 keV were analyzed to determine the locations where anisotropic pitch angle distributions (perpendicular flux dominating) change to isotropic distributions. We compared the positions of these mid-altitude isotropic distribution boundaries (IDB) for different activity conditions with low-altitude isotropic boundaries (IB) observed by NOAA&nbsp;12. Although the obtained statistical properties of IDBs were quite similar to those of IBs, a small difference in latitudes, most pronounced on the nightside and dayside, was found. We selected several events during which simultaneous observations in the same local time sector were available from Polar at mid-altitudes, and NOAA or DMSP at low-altitudes. Magnetic field mapping using the Tsyganenko T01 model with the observed solar wind input parameters showed that the low- and mid-altitude isotropization boundaries were closely located, which leads us to suggest that the Polar IDB and low-altitude IBs are related. Furthermore, we introduced a procedure to control the difference between the observed and model magnetic field to reduce the large scatter in the mapping. We showed that the isotropic distribution boundary (IDB) lies in the region where <i>R<sub>c</sub></i>/&rho;~6, that is at the boundary of the region where the non-adiabatic pitch angle scattering is strong enough. We therefore conclude that the scattering in the large field line curvature regions in the nightside current sheet is the main mechanism producing isotropization for the main portion of proton population in the tail current sheet. This mechanism controls the observed positions of both IB and IDB boundaries. Thus, this tail region can be probed, in its turn, with observations of these isotropy boundaries.<p> <b>Keywords.</b> Magnetospheric physics (Energetic particles, Precipitating; Magnetospheric configuration and dynamics; Magnetotail)https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1839/2005/angeo-23-1839-2005.pdf
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author N. Yu. Ganushkina
T. I. Pulkkinen
M. V. Kubyshkina
V. A. Sergeev
E. A. Lvova
T. A. Yahnina
A. G. Yahnin
T. Fritz
spellingShingle N. Yu. Ganushkina
T. I. Pulkkinen
M. V. Kubyshkina
V. A. Sergeev
E. A. Lvova
T. A. Yahnina
A. G. Yahnin
T. Fritz
Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
Annales Geophysicae
author_facet N. Yu. Ganushkina
T. I. Pulkkinen
M. V. Kubyshkina
V. A. Sergeev
E. A. Lvova
T. A. Yahnina
A. G. Yahnin
T. Fritz
author_sort N. Yu. Ganushkina
title Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
title_short Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
title_full Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
title_fullStr Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
title_full_unstemmed Proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
title_sort proton isotropy boundaries as measured on mid- and low-altitude satellites
publisher Copernicus Publications
series Annales Geophysicae
issn 0992-7689
1432-0576
publishDate 2005-07-01
description Polar CAMMICE MICS proton pitch angle distributions with energies of 31-80 keV were analyzed to determine the locations where anisotropic pitch angle distributions (perpendicular flux dominating) change to isotropic distributions. We compared the positions of these mid-altitude isotropic distribution boundaries (IDB) for different activity conditions with low-altitude isotropic boundaries (IB) observed by NOAA&nbsp;12. Although the obtained statistical properties of IDBs were quite similar to those of IBs, a small difference in latitudes, most pronounced on the nightside and dayside, was found. We selected several events during which simultaneous observations in the same local time sector were available from Polar at mid-altitudes, and NOAA or DMSP at low-altitudes. Magnetic field mapping using the Tsyganenko T01 model with the observed solar wind input parameters showed that the low- and mid-altitude isotropization boundaries were closely located, which leads us to suggest that the Polar IDB and low-altitude IBs are related. Furthermore, we introduced a procedure to control the difference between the observed and model magnetic field to reduce the large scatter in the mapping. We showed that the isotropic distribution boundary (IDB) lies in the region where <i>R<sub>c</sub></i>/&rho;~6, that is at the boundary of the region where the non-adiabatic pitch angle scattering is strong enough. We therefore conclude that the scattering in the large field line curvature regions in the nightside current sheet is the main mechanism producing isotropization for the main portion of proton population in the tail current sheet. This mechanism controls the observed positions of both IB and IDB boundaries. Thus, this tail region can be probed, in its turn, with observations of these isotropy boundaries.<p> <b>Keywords.</b> Magnetospheric physics (Energetic particles, Precipitating; Magnetospheric configuration and dynamics; Magnetotail)
url https://www.ann-geophys.net/23/1839/2005/angeo-23-1839-2005.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT nyuganushkina protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT tipulkkinen protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT mvkubyshkina protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT vasergeev protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT ealvova protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT tayahnina protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT agyahnin protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
AT tfritz protonisotropyboundariesasmeasuredonmidandlowaltitudesatellites
_version_ 1724843470301954048