An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.

A computational procedure to search for selective ligands for structurally related protein targets was developed and verified for serotonergic 5-HT7/5-HT1A receptor ligands. Starting from a set of compounds with annotated activity at both targets (grouped into four classes according to their activit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafał Kurczab, Vittorio Canale, Paweł Zajdel, Andrzej J Bojarski
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2016-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4896471?pdf=render
id doaj-73faac2748bc404d817474d3cdec7011
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73faac2748bc404d817474d3cdec70112020-11-25T01:33:18ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032016-01-01116e015698610.1371/journal.pone.0156986An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.Rafał KurczabVittorio CanalePaweł ZajdelAndrzej J BojarskiA computational procedure to search for selective ligands for structurally related protein targets was developed and verified for serotonergic 5-HT7/5-HT1A receptor ligands. Starting from a set of compounds with annotated activity at both targets (grouped into four classes according to their activity: selective toward each target, not-selective and not-selective but active) and with an additional set of decoys (prepared using DUD methodology), the SVM (Support Vector Machines) models were constructed using a selective subset as positive examples and four remaining classes as negative training examples. Based on these four component models, the consensus classifier was then constructed using a data fusion approach. The combination of two approaches of data representation (molecular fingerprints vs. structural interaction fingerprints), different training set sizes and selection of the best SVM component models for consensus model generation, were evaluated to determine the optimal settings for the developed algorithm. The results showed that consensus models with molecular fingerprints, a larger training set and the selection of component models based on MCC maximization provided the best predictive performance.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4896471?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Rafał Kurczab
Vittorio Canale
Paweł Zajdel
Andrzej J Bojarski
spellingShingle Rafał Kurczab
Vittorio Canale
Paweł Zajdel
Andrzej J Bojarski
An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Rafał Kurczab
Vittorio Canale
Paweł Zajdel
Andrzej J Bojarski
author_sort Rafał Kurczab
title An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
title_short An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
title_full An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
title_fullStr An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
title_full_unstemmed An Algorithm to Identify Target-Selective Ligands - A Case Study of 5-HT7/5-HT1A Receptor Selectivity.
title_sort algorithm to identify target-selective ligands - a case study of 5-ht7/5-ht1a receptor selectivity.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2016-01-01
description A computational procedure to search for selective ligands for structurally related protein targets was developed and verified for serotonergic 5-HT7/5-HT1A receptor ligands. Starting from a set of compounds with annotated activity at both targets (grouped into four classes according to their activity: selective toward each target, not-selective and not-selective but active) and with an additional set of decoys (prepared using DUD methodology), the SVM (Support Vector Machines) models were constructed using a selective subset as positive examples and four remaining classes as negative training examples. Based on these four component models, the consensus classifier was then constructed using a data fusion approach. The combination of two approaches of data representation (molecular fingerprints vs. structural interaction fingerprints), different training set sizes and selection of the best SVM component models for consensus model generation, were evaluated to determine the optimal settings for the developed algorithm. The results showed that consensus models with molecular fingerprints, a larger training set and the selection of component models based on MCC maximization provided the best predictive performance.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4896471?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT rafałkurczab analgorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT vittoriocanale analgorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT pawełzajdel analgorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT andrzejjbojarski analgorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT rafałkurczab algorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT vittoriocanale algorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT pawełzajdel algorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
AT andrzejjbojarski algorithmtoidentifytargetselectiveligandsacasestudyof5ht75ht1areceptorselectivity
_version_ 1725078152519090176