Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study

Background Thoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) and internal mammary vessels (IMVs) have both been widely employed as recipient vessels for use in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps. However, whether TDVs or IMVs are preferable as recipient vessels for autologous br...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kyung-Chul Moon, Jae-Min Lee, Si-Ook Baek, Seo-Yoon Jang, Eul-Sik Yoon, Byung-Il Lee, Seung-Ha Park
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons 2019-03-01
Series:Archives of Plastic Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2018-00913.pdf
id doaj-73fb2161cfa546aa96bd7c48235a343f
record_format Article
spelling doaj-73fb2161cfa546aa96bd7c48235a343f2020-11-24T23:59:28ZengKorean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive SurgeonsArchives of Plastic Surgery2234-61632234-61712019-03-0146214014610.5999/aps.2018.009133606Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative studyKyung-Chul Moon0Jae-Min Lee1Si-Ook Baek2Seo-Yoon Jang3Eul-Sik YoonByung-Il Lee4Seung-Ha Park5 Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea Department of Plastic Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, KoreaBackground Thoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) and internal mammary vessels (IMVs) have both been widely employed as recipient vessels for use in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps. However, whether TDVs or IMVs are preferable as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes when TDVs were used as recipient vessels to those obtained when IMVs were used as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap. Methods A retrospective matched-cohort study was performed. We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent a free MS-TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstructions after mastectomy between March 2003 and June 2013. After a one-to-one matching using age, 100 autologous breast reconstructions were selected in this study. Of the 100 breast reconstructions, 50 flaps were anastomosed to TDVs and 50 to IMVs. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes including operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and aesthetic score were compared between the two groups. Results No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in patient demographics and clinical outcomes, including the complication rates and aesthetic scores. There were no major complications such as total or partial flap loss in either group. Conclusions The results of our study demonstrate that both TDVs and IMVs were safe and efficient as recipient vessels in terms of the complication rates and aesthetic outcomes.http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2018-00913.pdfMammary arteriesPostoperative complicationsReconstructive surgical procedures
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Kyung-Chul Moon
Jae-Min Lee
Si-Ook Baek
Seo-Yoon Jang
Eul-Sik Yoon
Byung-Il Lee
Seung-Ha Park
spellingShingle Kyung-Chul Moon
Jae-Min Lee
Si-Ook Baek
Seo-Yoon Jang
Eul-Sik Yoon
Byung-Il Lee
Seung-Ha Park
Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
Archives of Plastic Surgery
Mammary arteries
Postoperative complications
Reconstructive surgical procedures
author_facet Kyung-Chul Moon
Jae-Min Lee
Si-Ook Baek
Seo-Yoon Jang
Eul-Sik Yoon
Byung-Il Lee
Seung-Ha Park
author_sort Kyung-Chul Moon
title Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
title_short Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
title_full Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
title_fullStr Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: A comparative study
title_sort choice of recipient vessels in muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction: a comparative study
publisher Korean Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons
series Archives of Plastic Surgery
issn 2234-6163
2234-6171
publishDate 2019-03-01
description Background Thoracodorsal vessels (TDVs) and internal mammary vessels (IMVs) have both been widely employed as recipient vessels for use in free muscle-sparing transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (MS-TRAM) flaps. However, whether TDVs or IMVs are preferable as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes when TDVs were used as recipient vessels to those obtained when IMVs were used as recipient vessels for autologous breast reconstruction with a free MS-TRAM flap. Methods A retrospective matched-cohort study was performed. We retrospectively reviewed data collected from patients who underwent a free MS-TRAM flap for autologous breast reconstructions after mastectomy between March 2003 and June 2013. After a one-to-one matching using age, 100 autologous breast reconstructions were selected in this study. Of the 100 breast reconstructions, 50 flaps were anastomosed to TDVs and 50 to IMVs. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes including operation time, length of hospital stay, postoperative complications, and aesthetic score were compared between the two groups. Results No statistically significant differences were found between the two groups in patient demographics and clinical outcomes, including the complication rates and aesthetic scores. There were no major complications such as total or partial flap loss in either group. Conclusions The results of our study demonstrate that both TDVs and IMVs were safe and efficient as recipient vessels in terms of the complication rates and aesthetic outcomes.
topic Mammary arteries
Postoperative complications
Reconstructive surgical procedures
url http://www.e-aps.org/upload/pdf/aps-2018-00913.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT kyungchulmoon choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT jaeminlee choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT siookbaek choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT seoyoonjang choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT eulsikyoon choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT byungillee choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
AT seunghapark choiceofrecipientvesselsinmusclesparingtransverserectusabdominismyocutaneousflapbreastreconstructionacomparativestudy
_version_ 1725447819422072832