Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most widely discussed abnormalities in neonates. The advantages of sonographic examination are well known, but its main disadvantage is that it might lead to over diagnosis, which might cause over treatment. Variations in the incidence of develo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Behrooz Zandi, Ashraf Mohammadzadeh, Mohammad Gharedaghi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Tehran University of Medical Sciences 2011-01-01
Series:Acta Medica Iranica
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/17744.pdf
id doaj-742311703863431c89c70cab84ec8e9d
record_format Article
spelling doaj-742311703863431c89c70cab84ec8e9d2020-11-25T03:53:51ZengTehran University of Medical SciencesActa Medica Iranica0044-60252011-01-014912527Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the HipBehrooz ZandiAshraf MohammadzadehMohammad GharedaghiDevelopmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most widely discussed abnormalities in neonates. The advantages of sonographic examination are well known, but its main disadvantage is that it might lead to over diagnosis, which might cause over treatment. Variations in the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip are well known. During six months study since September 2006 all 1300 neonates (2600 hips) were born in our hospital examined clinically and sonographically (587 hips) in the first 48 hours of life. Sonography was performed according to Graf's method, which considers mild hip sonographic abnormalities as type II a. Type IIb Graf were considered pathologic. Sonography screening of 587 hips detected 36 instances of deviation from normal indicating a sonographic DDH incidence of 12.5%. However, only 8 neonates remained abnormal and required treatment, indicating a true DDH incidence of 6 per 1000 live birth. Risk of diagnosis clinically and sonographicaly were 2.5 and 4.5 percent respectively and was significant (P<0.00001, x2=1170). In order to avoid over diagnosis in first days examination, repeated clinical and sonographic examination is required.http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/17744.pdfInfantNewbornIncidenceHip DislocationCongenital
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Behrooz Zandi
Ashraf Mohammadzadeh
Mohammad Gharedaghi
spellingShingle Behrooz Zandi
Ashraf Mohammadzadeh
Mohammad Gharedaghi
Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
Acta Medica Iranica
Infant
Newborn
Incidence
Hip Dislocation
Congenital
author_facet Behrooz Zandi
Ashraf Mohammadzadeh
Mohammad Gharedaghi
author_sort Behrooz Zandi
title Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_short Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_fullStr Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Clinical and Sonographic Prevalence of Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
title_sort comparison of clinical and sonographic prevalence of developmental dysplasia of the hip
publisher Tehran University of Medical Sciences
series Acta Medica Iranica
issn 0044-6025
publishDate 2011-01-01
description Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is one of the most widely discussed abnormalities in neonates. The advantages of sonographic examination are well known, but its main disadvantage is that it might lead to over diagnosis, which might cause over treatment. Variations in the incidence of developmental dysplasia of the hip are well known. During six months study since September 2006 all 1300 neonates (2600 hips) were born in our hospital examined clinically and sonographically (587 hips) in the first 48 hours of life. Sonography was performed according to Graf's method, which considers mild hip sonographic abnormalities as type II a. Type IIb Graf were considered pathologic. Sonography screening of 587 hips detected 36 instances of deviation from normal indicating a sonographic DDH incidence of 12.5%. However, only 8 neonates remained abnormal and required treatment, indicating a true DDH incidence of 6 per 1000 live birth. Risk of diagnosis clinically and sonographicaly were 2.5 and 4.5 percent respectively and was significant (P<0.00001, x2=1170). In order to avoid over diagnosis in first days examination, repeated clinical and sonographic examination is required.
topic Infant
Newborn
Incidence
Hip Dislocation
Congenital
url http://journals.tums.ac.ir/upload_files/pdf/17744.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT behroozzandi comparisonofclinicalandsonographicprevalenceofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT ashrafmohammadzadeh comparisonofclinicalandsonographicprevalenceofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
AT mohammadgharedaghi comparisonofclinicalandsonographicprevalenceofdevelopmentaldysplasiaofthehip
_version_ 1724476345407242240