Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2021-06-01
|
Series: | Journal of Risk and Financial Management |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281 |
id |
doaj-743fc77f4f184ee6be6a09494ac56f30 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-743fc77f4f184ee6be6a09494ac56f302021-07-01T00:46:31ZengMDPI AGJournal of Risk and Financial Management1911-80661911-80742021-06-011428128110.3390/jrfm14060281Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial BanksFaisal Abbas0Shoaib Ali1Imran Yousaf2Wing-Keung Wong3UCP Business School, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54000, PakistanAir University School of Management, Air University, Islamabad 44000, PakistanAir University School of Management, Air University, Islamabad 44000, PakistanDepartment of Finance, Fintech & Blockchain Research Center, and Big Data Research Center, Asia University, Taichung 41354, TaiwanThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US commercial banks. Furthermore, banks with higher deposits are less likely to face a funding shortage, and bank managers’ aggressive risk-taking activity is less likely to be monitored. Our findings infer that increases in bank funding liquidity increase both risk-weighted assets and liquidity creation, and deposit insurance creates a moral risk issue for banks taking excessive risks in response to deposit rises. The relationship between funding liquidity and the banks’ risk-taking varies with their capitalization and market conditions; the impact of funding liquidity on risk-taking is pronounced for well-capitalized banks and the Global Financial Crisis 2007. Our tests are robust for the usage of alternate proxy of funding liquidity and by controlling economic conditions. The findings of this study have implications for regulators to develop guidelines for the level of liquidity and risk-taking of commercial banks.https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281funding liquidityrisk-weighted assetsliquidity creationsZ-scores |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Faisal Abbas Shoaib Ali Imran Yousaf Wing-Keung Wong |
spellingShingle |
Faisal Abbas Shoaib Ali Imran Yousaf Wing-Keung Wong Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks Journal of Risk and Financial Management funding liquidity risk-weighted assets liquidity creations Z-scores |
author_facet |
Faisal Abbas Shoaib Ali Imran Yousaf Wing-Keung Wong |
author_sort |
Faisal Abbas |
title |
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks |
title_short |
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks |
title_full |
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks |
title_fullStr |
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks |
title_sort |
dynamics of funding liquidity and risk-taking: evidence from commercial banks |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Journal of Risk and Financial Management |
issn |
1911-8066 1911-8074 |
publishDate |
2021-06-01 |
description |
The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US commercial banks. Furthermore, banks with higher deposits are less likely to face a funding shortage, and bank managers’ aggressive risk-taking activity is less likely to be monitored. Our findings infer that increases in bank funding liquidity increase both risk-weighted assets and liquidity creation, and deposit insurance creates a moral risk issue for banks taking excessive risks in response to deposit rises. The relationship between funding liquidity and the banks’ risk-taking varies with their capitalization and market conditions; the impact of funding liquidity on risk-taking is pronounced for well-capitalized banks and the Global Financial Crisis 2007. Our tests are robust for the usage of alternate proxy of funding liquidity and by controlling economic conditions. The findings of this study have implications for regulators to develop guidelines for the level of liquidity and risk-taking of commercial banks. |
topic |
funding liquidity risk-weighted assets liquidity creations Z-scores |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT faisalabbas dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks AT shoaibali dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks AT imranyousaf dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks AT wingkeungwong dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks |
_version_ |
1721347740034662400 |