Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks

The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Faisal Abbas, Shoaib Ali, Imran Yousaf, Wing-Keung Wong
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Journal of Risk and Financial Management
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281
id doaj-743fc77f4f184ee6be6a09494ac56f30
record_format Article
spelling doaj-743fc77f4f184ee6be6a09494ac56f302021-07-01T00:46:31ZengMDPI AGJournal of Risk and Financial Management1911-80661911-80742021-06-011428128110.3390/jrfm14060281Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial BanksFaisal Abbas0Shoaib Ali1Imran Yousaf2Wing-Keung Wong3UCP Business School, University of Central Punjab, Lahore 54000, PakistanAir University School of Management, Air University, Islamabad 44000, PakistanAir University School of Management, Air University, Islamabad 44000, PakistanDepartment of Finance, Fintech & Blockchain Research Center, and Big Data Research Center, Asia University, Taichung 41354, TaiwanThe purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US commercial banks. Furthermore, banks with higher deposits are less likely to face a funding shortage, and bank managers’ aggressive risk-taking activity is less likely to be monitored. Our findings infer that increases in bank funding liquidity increase both risk-weighted assets and liquidity creation, and deposit insurance creates a moral risk issue for banks taking excessive risks in response to deposit rises. The relationship between funding liquidity and the banks’ risk-taking varies with their capitalization and market conditions; the impact of funding liquidity on risk-taking is pronounced for well-capitalized banks and the Global Financial Crisis 2007. Our tests are robust for the usage of alternate proxy of funding liquidity and by controlling economic conditions. The findings of this study have implications for regulators to develop guidelines for the level of liquidity and risk-taking of commercial banks.https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281funding liquidityrisk-weighted assetsliquidity creationsZ-scores
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Faisal Abbas
Shoaib Ali
Imran Yousaf
Wing-Keung Wong
spellingShingle Faisal Abbas
Shoaib Ali
Imran Yousaf
Wing-Keung Wong
Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
Journal of Risk and Financial Management
funding liquidity
risk-weighted assets
liquidity creations
Z-scores
author_facet Faisal Abbas
Shoaib Ali
Imran Yousaf
Wing-Keung Wong
author_sort Faisal Abbas
title Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
title_short Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
title_full Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
title_fullStr Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
title_full_unstemmed Dynamics of Funding Liquidity and Risk-Taking: Evidence from Commercial Banks
title_sort dynamics of funding liquidity and risk-taking: evidence from commercial banks
publisher MDPI AG
series Journal of Risk and Financial Management
issn 1911-8066
1911-8074
publishDate 2021-06-01
description The purpose of this study is to investigate the impact of funding liquidity risk on the banks’ risk-taking behavior. To test the hypotheses, we apply the two-step system GMM technique on US commercial banks data from 2002 to 2018. We find that funding liquidity increases the banks’ risk-taking of US commercial banks. Furthermore, banks with higher deposits are less likely to face a funding shortage, and bank managers’ aggressive risk-taking activity is less likely to be monitored. Our findings infer that increases in bank funding liquidity increase both risk-weighted assets and liquidity creation, and deposit insurance creates a moral risk issue for banks taking excessive risks in response to deposit rises. The relationship between funding liquidity and the banks’ risk-taking varies with their capitalization and market conditions; the impact of funding liquidity on risk-taking is pronounced for well-capitalized banks and the Global Financial Crisis 2007. Our tests are robust for the usage of alternate proxy of funding liquidity and by controlling economic conditions. The findings of this study have implications for regulators to develop guidelines for the level of liquidity and risk-taking of commercial banks.
topic funding liquidity
risk-weighted assets
liquidity creations
Z-scores
url https://www.mdpi.com/1911-8074/14/6/281
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalabbas dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks
AT shoaibali dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks
AT imranyousaf dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks
AT wingkeungwong dynamicsoffundingliquidityandrisktakingevidencefromcommercialbanks
_version_ 1721347740034662400