Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

In semi-arid climate regions of China, vegetation restoration on open pit mining lands is limited by soil moisture. However, multi-layered soil profiles can impede water infiltration into deeper underground, leaving more water stored in the root zone. Here, three types of soils with contrasting text...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xin Wang, Yanling Zhao, Huifang Liu, Wu Xiao, Shuzhao Chen
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-03-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/3/773
id doaj-744636da97ee405f90a369b405980177
record_format Article
spelling doaj-744636da97ee405f90a369b4059801772020-11-25T02:32:08ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412020-03-0112377310.3390/w12030773w12030773Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision AnalysisXin Wang0Yanling Zhao1Huifang Liu2Wu Xiao3Shuzhao Chen4Institute of Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaInstitute of Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration, China University of Mining & Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, ChinaChina ENFI Engineering Co., Ltd., Beijing 100036, ChinaDepartment of Land Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, ChinaSchool of Mines, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou 221116, ChinaIn semi-arid climate regions of China, vegetation restoration on open pit mining lands is limited by soil moisture. However, multi-layered soil profiles can impede water infiltration into deeper underground, leaving more water stored in the root zone. Here, three types of soils with contrasting texture, sandy loam (SL), sand (S), and silt loam (SiL), were used to construct four multilayer profiles: SL-SiL, SL-S, SL-S-SiL, and SL-SiL-S. Silt loam was taken from the humus layer, which is more conducive to plant growth than other layers, and it was allocated to the first layer in the four profiles, while sand and silt loam underlay the silt loam layer. Column experiments and Hydrus-1D simulation of the vertical infiltration and drainage process were performed: (1) The simulated results showed that when the sand layer underlay the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-S-SiL), the sandy loam layer could hold more water than the silt loam layer underlaying the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-SiL-S). The water content of the sandy loam layer in SL-SiL (95 cm) and SL-S-SiL (95 cm) was 28.3% higher than SL-SiL (74 cm) and 10.5% higher than SL-SiL-S (86 cm). (2) Both the measured and simulated cumulative infiltration and wetting front penetration time were positively related to the thickness of the silt loam layer and negatively related to the thickness of the sand layer. (3) The simulated infiltration rate, accumulation infiltration, and wetting front of the first layer were unaffected by the texture of the underlying layer. According to multi-criteria decision analysis, SL-S-SiL had the best water holding capacity and was suggested for land reclamation in the open pit mine in our research.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/3/773multilayer soil profilecapillary barrierhydraulic barrierhydrus-1d
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Xin Wang
Yanling Zhao
Huifang Liu
Wu Xiao
Shuzhao Chen
spellingShingle Xin Wang
Yanling Zhao
Huifang Liu
Wu Xiao
Shuzhao Chen
Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
Water
multilayer soil profile
capillary barrier
hydraulic barrier
hydrus-1d
author_facet Xin Wang
Yanling Zhao
Huifang Liu
Wu Xiao
Shuzhao Chen
author_sort Xin Wang
title Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
title_short Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
title_full Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
title_fullStr Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating the Water Holding Capacity of Multilayer Soil Profiles Using Hydrus-1D and Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis
title_sort evaluating the water holding capacity of multilayer soil profiles using hydrus-1d and multi-criteria decision analysis
publisher MDPI AG
series Water
issn 2073-4441
publishDate 2020-03-01
description In semi-arid climate regions of China, vegetation restoration on open pit mining lands is limited by soil moisture. However, multi-layered soil profiles can impede water infiltration into deeper underground, leaving more water stored in the root zone. Here, three types of soils with contrasting texture, sandy loam (SL), sand (S), and silt loam (SiL), were used to construct four multilayer profiles: SL-SiL, SL-S, SL-S-SiL, and SL-SiL-S. Silt loam was taken from the humus layer, which is more conducive to plant growth than other layers, and it was allocated to the first layer in the four profiles, while sand and silt loam underlay the silt loam layer. Column experiments and Hydrus-1D simulation of the vertical infiltration and drainage process were performed: (1) The simulated results showed that when the sand layer underlay the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-S-SiL), the sandy loam layer could hold more water than the silt loam layer underlaying the sandy loam layer (SL-SiL and SL-SiL-S). The water content of the sandy loam layer in SL-SiL (95 cm) and SL-S-SiL (95 cm) was 28.3% higher than SL-SiL (74 cm) and 10.5% higher than SL-SiL-S (86 cm). (2) Both the measured and simulated cumulative infiltration and wetting front penetration time were positively related to the thickness of the silt loam layer and negatively related to the thickness of the sand layer. (3) The simulated infiltration rate, accumulation infiltration, and wetting front of the first layer were unaffected by the texture of the underlying layer. According to multi-criteria decision analysis, SL-S-SiL had the best water holding capacity and was suggested for land reclamation in the open pit mine in our research.
topic multilayer soil profile
capillary barrier
hydraulic barrier
hydrus-1d
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/12/3/773
work_keys_str_mv AT xinwang evaluatingthewaterholdingcapacityofmultilayersoilprofilesusinghydrus1dandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT yanlingzhao evaluatingthewaterholdingcapacityofmultilayersoilprofilesusinghydrus1dandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT huifangliu evaluatingthewaterholdingcapacityofmultilayersoilprofilesusinghydrus1dandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT wuxiao evaluatingthewaterholdingcapacityofmultilayersoilprofilesusinghydrus1dandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
AT shuzhaochen evaluatingthewaterholdingcapacityofmultilayersoilprofilesusinghydrus1dandmulticriteriadecisionanalysis
_version_ 1724821206161424384