Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Background and Purpose Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have no...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Peter B. Sporns, Michael Schwake, André Kemmling, Jens Minnerup, Wolfram Schwindt, Thomas Niederstadt, Rene Schmidt, Uta Hanning
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Korean Stroke Society 2017-09-01
Series:Journal of Stroke
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2016-02061.pdf
id doaj-74499be3afc24250b1f221c3f84fcbe5
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74499be3afc24250b1f221c3f84fcbe52020-11-25T04:06:07ZengKorean Stroke SocietyJournal of Stroke2287-63912287-64052017-09-0119333333910.5853/jos.2016.02061203Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral HemorrhagePeter B. Sporns0Michael Schwake1André Kemmling2Jens Minnerup3Wolfram Schwindt4Thomas Niederstadt5Rene Schmidt6Uta Hanning7 Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany Department of Clinical Radiology, University Hospital of Muenster, Muenster, GermanyBackground and Purpose Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have not been well explored. Methods In this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were: 1) spontaneous ICH and 2) NCCT and CTA performed on admission within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. Discharge outcome was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and poor (mRS 4-6) outcomes. The impacts of BHS, BS and SS on outcome were assessed in univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of 182 patients with spontaneous ICH, 26 (14.3%) presented with BHS, 37 (20.3%) with BS and 39 (21.4%) with SS. There was a substantial correlation between SS and BS (κ=0.701) and a moderate correlation between SS and BHS (κ=0.424). In univariable logistic regression, higher baseline hematoma volume (P<0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.002) and the presence of BHS/BS/SS (all P<0.001) on admission CT scan were associated with poor outcome. Multivariable analysis identified intraventricular haemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 2.22 per mL, P=0.022), baseline hematoma volume (OR 1.03 per mL, P<0.001) and SS on CTA (OR 11.43, P<0.001) as independent predictors of poor outcome, showing that SS compared to BS and BHS was more powerful to predict poor outcome. Conclusions The NCCT BHS and BS are correlated with the CTA SS and are reliable predictors of poor outcome in patients with ICH. Of the CT variables indicating early hematoma expansion, SS on CTA was the most reliable outcome predictor. However, given their correlation with SS on CTA, BS and BHS on NCCT can be useful for predicting outcome if CTA is not obtainable.http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2016-02061.pdfcerebral hemorrhagecomputed tomographystrokehematoma
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Peter B. Sporns
Michael Schwake
André Kemmling
Jens Minnerup
Wolfram Schwindt
Thomas Niederstadt
Rene Schmidt
Uta Hanning
spellingShingle Peter B. Sporns
Michael Schwake
André Kemmling
Jens Minnerup
Wolfram Schwindt
Thomas Niederstadt
Rene Schmidt
Uta Hanning
Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
Journal of Stroke
cerebral hemorrhage
computed tomography
stroke
hematoma
author_facet Peter B. Sporns
Michael Schwake
André Kemmling
Jens Minnerup
Wolfram Schwindt
Thomas Niederstadt
Rene Schmidt
Uta Hanning
author_sort Peter B. Sporns
title Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_short Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_full Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_fullStr Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Spot Sign, Blend Sign and Black Hole Sign for Outcome Prediction in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage
title_sort comparison of spot sign, blend sign and black hole sign for outcome prediction in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage
publisher Korean Stroke Society
series Journal of Stroke
issn 2287-6391
2287-6405
publishDate 2017-09-01
description Background and Purpose Blend sign (BS) and black hole sign (BHS) on non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) and spot sign (SS) on CT-angiography (CTA) are indicators of early hematoma expansion in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). However, their independent contributions to outcome have not been well explored. Methods In this retrospective study, inclusion criteria were: 1) spontaneous ICH and 2) NCCT and CTA performed on admission within 6 hours after onset of symptoms. Discharge outcome was dichotomized as good (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] 0-3) and poor (mRS 4-6) outcomes. The impacts of BHS, BS and SS on outcome were assessed in univariate and multivariable logistic regression models. Results Of 182 patients with spontaneous ICH, 26 (14.3%) presented with BHS, 37 (20.3%) with BS and 39 (21.4%) with SS. There was a substantial correlation between SS and BS (κ=0.701) and a moderate correlation between SS and BHS (κ=0.424). In univariable logistic regression, higher baseline hematoma volume (P<0.001), intraventricular hemorrhage (P=0.002) and the presence of BHS/BS/SS (all P<0.001) on admission CT scan were associated with poor outcome. Multivariable analysis identified intraventricular haemorrhage (odds ratio [OR] 2.22 per mL, P=0.022), baseline hematoma volume (OR 1.03 per mL, P<0.001) and SS on CTA (OR 11.43, P<0.001) as independent predictors of poor outcome, showing that SS compared to BS and BHS was more powerful to predict poor outcome. Conclusions The NCCT BHS and BS are correlated with the CTA SS and are reliable predictors of poor outcome in patients with ICH. Of the CT variables indicating early hematoma expansion, SS on CTA was the most reliable outcome predictor. However, given their correlation with SS on CTA, BS and BHS on NCCT can be useful for predicting outcome if CTA is not obtainable.
topic cerebral hemorrhage
computed tomography
stroke
hematoma
url http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2016-02061.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT peterbsporns comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT michaelschwake comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT andrekemmling comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT jensminnerup comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT wolframschwindt comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT thomasniederstadt comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT reneschmidt comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
AT utahanning comparisonofspotsignblendsignandblackholesignforoutcomepredictioninpatientswithintracerebralhemorrhage
_version_ 1724432333063323648