Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups

Abstract Background The pathophysiology and pathology of peri-implantitis remain unclear; however, its similarity to periodontitis has been described. The evaluation of peri-implant tissue and the diagnostic criteria of peri-implant disease are not currently standardized as they are for periodontiti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Keisuke Seki, Shinya Nakabayashi, Naoki Tanabe, Atsushi Kamimoto, Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2017-10-01
Series:International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-017-0108-0
id doaj-746ee710fd784782a4a22fbb32c5d567
record_format Article
spelling doaj-746ee710fd784782a4a22fbb32c5d5672020-11-24T22:58:47ZengSpringerOpenInternational Journal of Implant Dentistry2198-40342017-10-01311710.1186/s40729-017-0108-0Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groupsKeisuke Seki0Shinya Nakabayashi1Naoki Tanabe2Atsushi Kamimoto3Yoshiyuki Hagiwara4Implant Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry Dental HospitalImplant Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry Dental HospitalDepartment of Applied Mathematics and InformaticsImplant Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry Dental HospitalImplant Dentistry, Nihon University School of Dentistry Dental HospitalAbstract Background The pathophysiology and pathology of peri-implantitis remain unclear; however, its similarity to periodontitis has been described. The evaluation of peri-implant tissue and the diagnostic criteria of peri-implant disease are not currently standardized as they are for periodontitis. In this study, we evaluated clinical parameters during the implant maintenance period to determine significant correlations between these parameters. Methods We examined 55 implant patients at the time of maintenance visits between April and September 2016 and classified patients into a healthy group (H) and a history-of-periodontitis group (HP). For each implant, we evaluated the modified plaque index, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing as clinical parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results A total of 130 implants were assessed. The mean time since implant placement was 6 years and 6 months. The prevalence of implant-based peri-implantitis was 10.8% of all the implants. All cases of implant-based peri-implantitis came from the HP group, and many were present in patients with a history of severe periodontitis. The probing pocket depth around the implant was significantly greater in the HP group than in the H group. We found weak positive correlations between the probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing (r s  = 0.401, p < 0.05) in the H group and between the probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing (r s  = 0.241, p < 0.05) and the modified plaque index (r s  = 0.228, p < 0.05) in the HP group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing as clinical parameters are important indicators for the diagnosis of peri-implant disease during the maintenance period among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-017-0108-0Dental implantMaintenanceModified plaque indexProbing depthBleeding on probingCorrelation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Keisuke Seki
Shinya Nakabayashi
Naoki Tanabe
Atsushi Kamimoto
Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
spellingShingle Keisuke Seki
Shinya Nakabayashi
Naoki Tanabe
Atsushi Kamimoto
Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
Dental implant
Maintenance
Modified plaque index
Probing depth
Bleeding on probing
Correlation
author_facet Keisuke Seki
Shinya Nakabayashi
Naoki Tanabe
Atsushi Kamimoto
Yoshiyuki Hagiwara
author_sort Keisuke Seki
title Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
title_short Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
title_full Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
title_fullStr Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
title_full_unstemmed Correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
title_sort correlations between clinical parameters in implant maintenance patients: analysis among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups
publisher SpringerOpen
series International Journal of Implant Dentistry
issn 2198-4034
publishDate 2017-10-01
description Abstract Background The pathophysiology and pathology of peri-implantitis remain unclear; however, its similarity to periodontitis has been described. The evaluation of peri-implant tissue and the diagnostic criteria of peri-implant disease are not currently standardized as they are for periodontitis. In this study, we evaluated clinical parameters during the implant maintenance period to determine significant correlations between these parameters. Methods We examined 55 implant patients at the time of maintenance visits between April and September 2016 and classified patients into a healthy group (H) and a history-of-periodontitis group (HP). For each implant, we evaluated the modified plaque index, probing pocket depth, and bleeding on probing as clinical parameters. Statistical analyses were performed with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results A total of 130 implants were assessed. The mean time since implant placement was 6 years and 6 months. The prevalence of implant-based peri-implantitis was 10.8% of all the implants. All cases of implant-based peri-implantitis came from the HP group, and many were present in patients with a history of severe periodontitis. The probing pocket depth around the implant was significantly greater in the HP group than in the H group. We found weak positive correlations between the probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing (r s  = 0.401, p < 0.05) in the H group and between the probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing (r s  = 0.241, p < 0.05) and the modified plaque index (r s  = 0.228, p < 0.05) in the HP group. Conclusions Our findings suggest that probing pocket depth and bleeding on probing as clinical parameters are important indicators for the diagnosis of peri-implant disease during the maintenance period among healthy and history-of-periodontitis groups.
topic Dental implant
Maintenance
Modified plaque index
Probing depth
Bleeding on probing
Correlation
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s40729-017-0108-0
work_keys_str_mv AT keisukeseki correlationsbetweenclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancepatientsanalysisamonghealthyandhistoryofperiodontitisgroups
AT shinyanakabayashi correlationsbetweenclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancepatientsanalysisamonghealthyandhistoryofperiodontitisgroups
AT naokitanabe correlationsbetweenclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancepatientsanalysisamonghealthyandhistoryofperiodontitisgroups
AT atsushikamimoto correlationsbetweenclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancepatientsanalysisamonghealthyandhistoryofperiodontitisgroups
AT yoshiyukihagiwara correlationsbetweenclinicalparametersinimplantmaintenancepatientsanalysisamonghealthyandhistoryofperiodontitisgroups
_version_ 1725646559850266624