Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.

An increasing number of genome-wide association (GWA) studies are now using the higher resolution 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (1000G) for imputation, with the expectation that 1000G imputation will lead to the discovery of additional associated loci when compared to HapMap imputation. In or...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Paul S de Vries, Maria Sabater-Lleal, Daniel I Chasman, Stella Trompet, Tarunveer S Ahluwalia, Alexander Teumer, Marcus E Kleber, Ming-Huei Chen, Jie Jin Wang, John R Attia, Riccardo E Marioni, Maristella Steri, Lu-Chen Weng, Rene Pool, Vera Grossmann, Jennifer A Brody, Cristina Venturini, Toshiko Tanaka, Lynda M Rose, Christopher Oldmeadow, Johanna Mazur, Saonli Basu, Mattias Frånberg, Qiong Yang, Symen Ligthart, Jouke J Hottenga, Ann Rumley, Antonella Mulas, Anton J M de Craen, Anne Grotevendt, Kent D Taylor, Graciela E Delgado, Annette Kifley, Lorna M Lopez, Tina L Berentzen, Massimo Mangino, Stefania Bandinelli, Alanna C Morrison, Anders Hamsten, Geoffrey Tofler, Moniek P M de Maat, Harmen H M Draisma, Gordon D Lowe, Magdalena Zoledziewska, Naveed Sattar, Karl J Lackner, Uwe Völker, Barbara McKnight, Jie Huang, Elizabeth G Holliday, Mark A McEvoy, John M Starr, Pirro G Hysi, Dena G Hernandez, Weihua Guan, Fernando Rivadeneira, Wendy L McArdle, P Eline Slagboom, Tanja Zeller, Bruce M Psaty, André G Uitterlinden, Eco J C de Geus, David J Stott, Harald Binder, Albert Hofman, Oscar H Franco, Jerome I Rotter, Luigi Ferrucci, Tim D Spector, Ian J Deary, Winfried März, Andreas Greinacher, Philipp S Wild, Francesco Cucca, Dorret I Boomsma, Hugh Watkins, Weihong Tang, Paul M Ridker, Jan W Jukema, Rodney J Scott, Paul Mitchell, Torben Hansen, Christopher J O'Donnell, Nicholas L Smith, David P Strachan, Abbas Dehghan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2017-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249120?pdf=render
id doaj-747b3e99f9484bed947ca09451fdbbf2
record_format Article
spelling doaj-747b3e99f9484bed947ca09451fdbbf22020-11-25T01:55:53ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032017-01-01121e016774210.1371/journal.pone.0167742Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.Paul S de VriesMaria Sabater-LlealDaniel I ChasmanStella TrompetTarunveer S AhluwaliaAlexander TeumerMarcus E KleberMing-Huei ChenJie Jin WangJohn R AttiaRiccardo E MarioniMaristella SteriLu-Chen WengRene PoolVera GrossmannJennifer A BrodyCristina VenturiniToshiko TanakaLynda M RoseChristopher OldmeadowJohanna MazurSaonli BasuMattias FrånbergQiong YangSymen LigthartJouke J HottengaAnn RumleyAntonella MulasAnton J M de CraenAnne GrotevendtKent D TaylorGraciela E DelgadoAnnette KifleyLorna M LopezTina L BerentzenMassimo ManginoStefania BandinelliAlanna C MorrisonAnders HamstenGeoffrey ToflerMoniek P M de MaatHarmen H M DraismaGordon D LoweMagdalena ZoledziewskaNaveed SattarKarl J LacknerUwe VölkerBarbara McKnightJie HuangElizabeth G HollidayMark A McEvoyJohn M StarrPirro G HysiDena G HernandezWeihua GuanFernando RivadeneiraWendy L McArdleP Eline SlagboomTanja ZellerBruce M PsatyAndré G UitterlindenEco J C de GeusDavid J StottHarald BinderAlbert HofmanOscar H FrancoJerome I RotterLuigi FerrucciTim D SpectorIan J DearyWinfried MärzAndreas GreinacherPhilipp S WildFrancesco CuccaDorret I BoomsmaHugh WatkinsWeihong TangPaul M RidkerJan W JukemaRodney J ScottPaul MitchellTorben HansenChristopher J O'DonnellNicholas L SmithDavid P StrachanAbbas DehghanAn increasing number of genome-wide association (GWA) studies are now using the higher resolution 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (1000G) for imputation, with the expectation that 1000G imputation will lead to the discovery of additional associated loci when compared to HapMap imputation. In order to assess the improvement of 1000G over HapMap imputation in identifying associated loci, we compared the results of GWA studies of circulating fibrinogen based on the two reference panels. Using both HapMap and 1000G imputation we performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies comprising the same 91,953 individuals. We identified six additional signals using 1000G imputation, while 29 loci were associated using both HapMap and 1000G imputation. One locus identified using HapMap imputation was not significant using 1000G imputation. The genome-wide significance threshold of 5×10-8 is based on the number of independent statistical tests using HapMap imputation, and 1000G imputation may lead to further independent tests that should be corrected for. When using a stricter Bonferroni correction for the 1000G GWA study (P-value < 2.5×10-8), the number of loci significant only using HapMap imputation increased to 4 while the number of loci significant only using 1000G decreased to 5. In conclusion, 1000G imputation enabled the identification of 20% more loci than HapMap imputation, although the advantage of 1000G imputation became less clear when a stricter Bonferroni correction was used. More generally, our results provide insights that are applicable to the implementation of other dense reference panels that are under development.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249120?pdf=render
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Paul S de Vries
Maria Sabater-Lleal
Daniel I Chasman
Stella Trompet
Tarunveer S Ahluwalia
Alexander Teumer
Marcus E Kleber
Ming-Huei Chen
Jie Jin Wang
John R Attia
Riccardo E Marioni
Maristella Steri
Lu-Chen Weng
Rene Pool
Vera Grossmann
Jennifer A Brody
Cristina Venturini
Toshiko Tanaka
Lynda M Rose
Christopher Oldmeadow
Johanna Mazur
Saonli Basu
Mattias Frånberg
Qiong Yang
Symen Ligthart
Jouke J Hottenga
Ann Rumley
Antonella Mulas
Anton J M de Craen
Anne Grotevendt
Kent D Taylor
Graciela E Delgado
Annette Kifley
Lorna M Lopez
Tina L Berentzen
Massimo Mangino
Stefania Bandinelli
Alanna C Morrison
Anders Hamsten
Geoffrey Tofler
Moniek P M de Maat
Harmen H M Draisma
Gordon D Lowe
Magdalena Zoledziewska
Naveed Sattar
Karl J Lackner
Uwe Völker
Barbara McKnight
Jie Huang
Elizabeth G Holliday
Mark A McEvoy
John M Starr
Pirro G Hysi
Dena G Hernandez
Weihua Guan
Fernando Rivadeneira
Wendy L McArdle
P Eline Slagboom
Tanja Zeller
Bruce M Psaty
André G Uitterlinden
Eco J C de Geus
David J Stott
Harald Binder
Albert Hofman
Oscar H Franco
Jerome I Rotter
Luigi Ferrucci
Tim D Spector
Ian J Deary
Winfried März
Andreas Greinacher
Philipp S Wild
Francesco Cucca
Dorret I Boomsma
Hugh Watkins
Weihong Tang
Paul M Ridker
Jan W Jukema
Rodney J Scott
Paul Mitchell
Torben Hansen
Christopher J O'Donnell
Nicholas L Smith
David P Strachan
Abbas Dehghan
spellingShingle Paul S de Vries
Maria Sabater-Lleal
Daniel I Chasman
Stella Trompet
Tarunveer S Ahluwalia
Alexander Teumer
Marcus E Kleber
Ming-Huei Chen
Jie Jin Wang
John R Attia
Riccardo E Marioni
Maristella Steri
Lu-Chen Weng
Rene Pool
Vera Grossmann
Jennifer A Brody
Cristina Venturini
Toshiko Tanaka
Lynda M Rose
Christopher Oldmeadow
Johanna Mazur
Saonli Basu
Mattias Frånberg
Qiong Yang
Symen Ligthart
Jouke J Hottenga
Ann Rumley
Antonella Mulas
Anton J M de Craen
Anne Grotevendt
Kent D Taylor
Graciela E Delgado
Annette Kifley
Lorna M Lopez
Tina L Berentzen
Massimo Mangino
Stefania Bandinelli
Alanna C Morrison
Anders Hamsten
Geoffrey Tofler
Moniek P M de Maat
Harmen H M Draisma
Gordon D Lowe
Magdalena Zoledziewska
Naveed Sattar
Karl J Lackner
Uwe Völker
Barbara McKnight
Jie Huang
Elizabeth G Holliday
Mark A McEvoy
John M Starr
Pirro G Hysi
Dena G Hernandez
Weihua Guan
Fernando Rivadeneira
Wendy L McArdle
P Eline Slagboom
Tanja Zeller
Bruce M Psaty
André G Uitterlinden
Eco J C de Geus
David J Stott
Harald Binder
Albert Hofman
Oscar H Franco
Jerome I Rotter
Luigi Ferrucci
Tim D Spector
Ian J Deary
Winfried März
Andreas Greinacher
Philipp S Wild
Francesco Cucca
Dorret I Boomsma
Hugh Watkins
Weihong Tang
Paul M Ridker
Jan W Jukema
Rodney J Scott
Paul Mitchell
Torben Hansen
Christopher J O'Donnell
Nicholas L Smith
David P Strachan
Abbas Dehghan
Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
PLoS ONE
author_facet Paul S de Vries
Maria Sabater-Lleal
Daniel I Chasman
Stella Trompet
Tarunveer S Ahluwalia
Alexander Teumer
Marcus E Kleber
Ming-Huei Chen
Jie Jin Wang
John R Attia
Riccardo E Marioni
Maristella Steri
Lu-Chen Weng
Rene Pool
Vera Grossmann
Jennifer A Brody
Cristina Venturini
Toshiko Tanaka
Lynda M Rose
Christopher Oldmeadow
Johanna Mazur
Saonli Basu
Mattias Frånberg
Qiong Yang
Symen Ligthart
Jouke J Hottenga
Ann Rumley
Antonella Mulas
Anton J M de Craen
Anne Grotevendt
Kent D Taylor
Graciela E Delgado
Annette Kifley
Lorna M Lopez
Tina L Berentzen
Massimo Mangino
Stefania Bandinelli
Alanna C Morrison
Anders Hamsten
Geoffrey Tofler
Moniek P M de Maat
Harmen H M Draisma
Gordon D Lowe
Magdalena Zoledziewska
Naveed Sattar
Karl J Lackner
Uwe Völker
Barbara McKnight
Jie Huang
Elizabeth G Holliday
Mark A McEvoy
John M Starr
Pirro G Hysi
Dena G Hernandez
Weihua Guan
Fernando Rivadeneira
Wendy L McArdle
P Eline Slagboom
Tanja Zeller
Bruce M Psaty
André G Uitterlinden
Eco J C de Geus
David J Stott
Harald Binder
Albert Hofman
Oscar H Franco
Jerome I Rotter
Luigi Ferrucci
Tim D Spector
Ian J Deary
Winfried März
Andreas Greinacher
Philipp S Wild
Francesco Cucca
Dorret I Boomsma
Hugh Watkins
Weihong Tang
Paul M Ridker
Jan W Jukema
Rodney J Scott
Paul Mitchell
Torben Hansen
Christopher J O'Donnell
Nicholas L Smith
David P Strachan
Abbas Dehghan
author_sort Paul S de Vries
title Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
title_short Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
title_full Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
title_fullStr Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of HapMap and 1000 Genomes Reference Panels in a Large-Scale Genome-Wide Association Study.
title_sort comparison of hapmap and 1000 genomes reference panels in a large-scale genome-wide association study.
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
series PLoS ONE
issn 1932-6203
publishDate 2017-01-01
description An increasing number of genome-wide association (GWA) studies are now using the higher resolution 1000 Genomes Project reference panel (1000G) for imputation, with the expectation that 1000G imputation will lead to the discovery of additional associated loci when compared to HapMap imputation. In order to assess the improvement of 1000G over HapMap imputation in identifying associated loci, we compared the results of GWA studies of circulating fibrinogen based on the two reference panels. Using both HapMap and 1000G imputation we performed a meta-analysis of 22 studies comprising the same 91,953 individuals. We identified six additional signals using 1000G imputation, while 29 loci were associated using both HapMap and 1000G imputation. One locus identified using HapMap imputation was not significant using 1000G imputation. The genome-wide significance threshold of 5×10-8 is based on the number of independent statistical tests using HapMap imputation, and 1000G imputation may lead to further independent tests that should be corrected for. When using a stricter Bonferroni correction for the 1000G GWA study (P-value < 2.5×10-8), the number of loci significant only using HapMap imputation increased to 4 while the number of loci significant only using 1000G decreased to 5. In conclusion, 1000G imputation enabled the identification of 20% more loci than HapMap imputation, although the advantage of 1000G imputation became less clear when a stricter Bonferroni correction was used. More generally, our results provide insights that are applicable to the implementation of other dense reference panels that are under development.
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5249120?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT paulsdevries comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT mariasabaterlleal comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT danielichasman comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT stellatrompet comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT tarunveersahluwalia comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT alexanderteumer comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT marcusekleber comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT minghueichen comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT jiejinwang comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT johnrattia comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT riccardoemarioni comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT maristellasteri comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT luchenweng comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT renepool comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT veragrossmann comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT jenniferabrody comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT cristinaventurini comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT toshikotanaka comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT lyndamrose comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT christopheroldmeadow comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT johannamazur comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT saonlibasu comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT mattiasfranberg comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT qiongyang comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT symenligthart comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT joukejhottenga comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT annrumley comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT antonellamulas comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT antonjmdecraen comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT annegrotevendt comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT kentdtaylor comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT gracielaedelgado comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT annettekifley comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT lornamlopez comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT tinalberentzen comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT massimomangino comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT stefaniabandinelli comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT alannacmorrison comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT andershamsten comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT geoffreytofler comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT moniekpmdemaat comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT harmenhmdraisma comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT gordondlowe comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT magdalenazoledziewska comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT naveedsattar comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT karljlackner comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT uwevolker comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT barbaramcknight comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT jiehuang comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT elizabethgholliday comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT markamcevoy comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT johnmstarr comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT pirroghysi comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT denaghernandez comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT weihuaguan comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT fernandorivadeneira comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT wendylmcardle comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT pelineslagboom comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT tanjazeller comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT brucempsaty comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT andreguitterlinden comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT ecojcdegeus comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT davidjstott comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT haraldbinder comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT alberthofman comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT oscarhfranco comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT jeromeirotter comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT luigiferrucci comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT timdspector comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT ianjdeary comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT winfriedmarz comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT andreasgreinacher comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT philippswild comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT francescocucca comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT dorretiboomsma comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT hughwatkins comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT weihongtang comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT paulmridker comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT janwjukema comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT rodneyjscott comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT paulmitchell comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT torbenhansen comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT christopherjodonnell comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT nicholaslsmith comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT davidpstrachan comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
AT abbasdehghan comparisonofhapmapand1000genomesreferencepanelsinalargescalegenomewideassociationstudy
_version_ 1724982772468023296