Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned

This article presents an overall exploratory comparison of the English teacher training courses (TTCs) held in Iranian private language institutes and Certificate in Teaching English to Adults (CELTA). Data were gathered through Iranian institutes’ websites; interviews with Iranian English teachers,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mansoor Ganji, Saeed Ketabi, Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Taylor & Francis Group 2018-01-01
Series:Cogent Education
Subjects:
Online Access:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507174
id doaj-74972f24329a4a519f11368af38641ca
record_format Article
spelling doaj-74972f24329a4a519f11368af38641ca2021-08-24T14:41:01ZengTaylor & Francis GroupCogent Education2331-186X2018-01-015110.1080/2331186X.2018.15071741507174Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learnedMansoor Ganji0Saeed Ketabi1Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari2Chabahar Maritime UniversityUniversity of IsfahanUniversity of IsfahanThis article presents an overall exploratory comparison of the English teacher training courses (TTCs) held in Iranian private language institutes and Certificate in Teaching English to Adults (CELTA). Data were gathered through Iranian institutes’ websites; interviews with Iranian English teachers, English teachers holding CELTA certificate, and teacher trainers; as well as questionnaires filled out by institutes’ supervisors and CELTA holders. Content analysis and document analysis were conducted to reveal the similarities and differences between CELTA and Iranian TTCs. Results showed that Iranian TTCs were quite different from CELTA, especially at implementation and evaluation stages. The findings revealed that Iranian TTCs neglected the trainees’ needs, limited the teachers to a series of practical steps in teaching, did not provide enough opportunities for teaching practice, and evaluated the trainees’ performances subjectively. However, they enjoyed systematic planning, contained practical techniques for teaching the language components and skills, and were based on institutes’ needs. Iranian teacher trainers are advised to involve the trainees more in the implementation of the course through doing assignments, to provide the trainees with video recordings of the experienced teachers’ classes for observation, and develop an objective criterion for assessing the trainees’ teaching performances.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507174teacher training courseiranian private language institutesplanningimplementationevaluation
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Mansoor Ganji
Saeed Ketabi
Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
spellingShingle Mansoor Ganji
Saeed Ketabi
Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
Cogent Education
teacher training course
iranian private language institutes
planning
implementation
evaluation
author_facet Mansoor Ganji
Saeed Ketabi
Mohammadtaghi Shahnazari
author_sort Mansoor Ganji
title Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
title_short Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
title_full Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
title_fullStr Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
title_full_unstemmed Comparing local and international English teacher training courses: Lessons learned
title_sort comparing local and international english teacher training courses: lessons learned
publisher Taylor & Francis Group
series Cogent Education
issn 2331-186X
publishDate 2018-01-01
description This article presents an overall exploratory comparison of the English teacher training courses (TTCs) held in Iranian private language institutes and Certificate in Teaching English to Adults (CELTA). Data were gathered through Iranian institutes’ websites; interviews with Iranian English teachers, English teachers holding CELTA certificate, and teacher trainers; as well as questionnaires filled out by institutes’ supervisors and CELTA holders. Content analysis and document analysis were conducted to reveal the similarities and differences between CELTA and Iranian TTCs. Results showed that Iranian TTCs were quite different from CELTA, especially at implementation and evaluation stages. The findings revealed that Iranian TTCs neglected the trainees’ needs, limited the teachers to a series of practical steps in teaching, did not provide enough opportunities for teaching practice, and evaluated the trainees’ performances subjectively. However, they enjoyed systematic planning, contained practical techniques for teaching the language components and skills, and were based on institutes’ needs. Iranian teacher trainers are advised to involve the trainees more in the implementation of the course through doing assignments, to provide the trainees with video recordings of the experienced teachers’ classes for observation, and develop an objective criterion for assessing the trainees’ teaching performances.
topic teacher training course
iranian private language institutes
planning
implementation
evaluation
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1507174
work_keys_str_mv AT mansoorganji comparinglocalandinternationalenglishteachertrainingcourseslessonslearned
AT saeedketabi comparinglocalandinternationalenglishteachertrainingcourseslessonslearned
AT mohammadtaghishahnazari comparinglocalandinternationalenglishteachertrainingcourseslessonslearned
_version_ 1721197372497723392