Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data

The Children’s Trust is a local government taxing authority that uses property tax dollars to fund programming for Miami-Dade County children and families. To become more efficient, Trust Central was created and now automates our full business cycle. Data flow is solicitation → contracting → progra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Marden F Munoz, Stephanie Sylvestre
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Swansea University 2018-10-01
Series:International Journal of Population Data Science
Online Access:https://ijpds.org/article/view/1088
id doaj-749d8c02cf9342179a190c963ed284f1
record_format Article
spelling doaj-749d8c02cf9342179a190c963ed284f12020-11-25T02:50:44ZengSwansea UniversityInternational Journal of Population Data Science2399-49082018-10-013510.23889/ijpds.v3i5.1088Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With DataMarden F Munoz0Stephanie Sylvestre1The Children's TrustThe Children's Trust The Children’s Trust is a local government taxing authority that uses property tax dollars to fund programming for Miami-Dade County children and families. To become more efficient, Trust Central was created and now automates our full business cycle. Data flow is solicitation → contracting → program metrics → solicitation. Agencies apply for funding, contract to provide services, report their progress. Their progress is used to determine future solicitation criteria. Data automatically flows from one module to another. Trust Central allowed us to move from using 5 data points to make funding decisions to 24 data points. We were able to look across our various initiatives to ensure that our funding decisions were equitable. Funding decisions were backed by data and easy to share with applicants. We created context and communicated funding decisions in a way that reduced emotional conflicts and appeals. As a reference point, we had 96 appeal meetings last funding cycle - this funding cycle no appeal meetings and only 19 review meetings; a cost savings of $15,850 in meetings. Another reference point, we spent 1 week reviewing data to make funding decisions last funding cycle - this funding cycle we spent 4 weeks reviewing data in a more meaningful and valuable way. We made $68M in funding decisions without any negative feedback from the community. Our relationship with the community pivoted from negative to positive. This is a first for us! We are now positioned to be a mentor for both governmental and non-governmental funders. https://ijpds.org/article/view/1088
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Marden F Munoz
Stephanie Sylvestre
spellingShingle Marden F Munoz
Stephanie Sylvestre
Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
International Journal of Population Data Science
author_facet Marden F Munoz
Stephanie Sylvestre
author_sort Marden F Munoz
title Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
title_short Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
title_full Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
title_fullStr Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
title_full_unstemmed Trust Central Eases Funding Decisions With Data
title_sort trust central eases funding decisions with data
publisher Swansea University
series International Journal of Population Data Science
issn 2399-4908
publishDate 2018-10-01
description The Children’s Trust is a local government taxing authority that uses property tax dollars to fund programming for Miami-Dade County children and families. To become more efficient, Trust Central was created and now automates our full business cycle. Data flow is solicitation → contracting → program metrics → solicitation. Agencies apply for funding, contract to provide services, report their progress. Their progress is used to determine future solicitation criteria. Data automatically flows from one module to another. Trust Central allowed us to move from using 5 data points to make funding decisions to 24 data points. We were able to look across our various initiatives to ensure that our funding decisions were equitable. Funding decisions were backed by data and easy to share with applicants. We created context and communicated funding decisions in a way that reduced emotional conflicts and appeals. As a reference point, we had 96 appeal meetings last funding cycle - this funding cycle no appeal meetings and only 19 review meetings; a cost savings of $15,850 in meetings. Another reference point, we spent 1 week reviewing data to make funding decisions last funding cycle - this funding cycle we spent 4 weeks reviewing data in a more meaningful and valuable way. We made $68M in funding decisions without any negative feedback from the community. Our relationship with the community pivoted from negative to positive. This is a first for us! We are now positioned to be a mentor for both governmental and non-governmental funders.
url https://ijpds.org/article/view/1088
work_keys_str_mv AT mardenfmunoz trustcentraleasesfundingdecisionswithdata
AT stephaniesylvestre trustcentraleasesfundingdecisionswithdata
_version_ 1724736778259136512