Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning
The use of conventional logical connectives either in logic, in mathematics, or in both cannot determine the meanings of those connectives. This is because every model of full conventional set theory can be extended conservatively to a model of intuitionistic set plus class theory, a model in which...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2018-06-01
|
Series: | Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0018 |
id |
doaj-74d4de612015449b858703784fc15093 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-74d4de612015449b858703784fc150932021-09-05T14:02:01ZengSciendoStudies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric0860-150X2199-60592018-06-01541899810.2478/slgr-2018-0018slgr-2018-0018Logical rules and the determinacy of meaningMcCarty Charles0Department of Philosophy, Indiana University,Indiana, USAThe use of conventional logical connectives either in logic, in mathematics, or in both cannot determine the meanings of those connectives. This is because every model of full conventional set theory can be extended conservatively to a model of intuitionistic set plus class theory, a model in which the meanings of the connectives are decidedly intuitionistic and nonconventional. The reasoning for this conclusion is acceptable to both intuitionistic and classical mathematicians. En route, I take a detour to prove that, given strictly intuitionistic principles, classical negation cannot exist.https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0018negationtruth valueintuitionistic set theoryuse theory of meaning |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
McCarty Charles |
spellingShingle |
McCarty Charles Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric negation truth value intuitionistic set theory use theory of meaning |
author_facet |
McCarty Charles |
author_sort |
McCarty Charles |
title |
Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
title_short |
Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
title_full |
Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
title_fullStr |
Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
title_full_unstemmed |
Logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
title_sort |
logical rules and the determinacy of meaning |
publisher |
Sciendo |
series |
Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric |
issn |
0860-150X 2199-6059 |
publishDate |
2018-06-01 |
description |
The use of conventional logical connectives either in logic, in mathematics, or in both cannot determine the meanings of those connectives. This is because every model of full conventional set theory can be extended conservatively to a model of intuitionistic set plus class theory, a model in which the meanings of the connectives are decidedly intuitionistic and nonconventional. The reasoning for this conclusion is acceptable to both intuitionistic and classical mathematicians. En route, I take a detour to prove that, given strictly intuitionistic principles, classical negation cannot exist. |
topic |
negation truth value intuitionistic set theory use theory of meaning |
url |
https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0018 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT mccartycharles logicalrulesandthedeterminacyofmeaning |
_version_ |
1717809213618520064 |