Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow
Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowl...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
MDPI AG
2020-02-01
|
Series: | Algorithms |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/13/3/53 |
id |
doaj-74d7dca8ce254e4faef0cac5b3684e46 |
---|---|
record_format |
Article |
spelling |
doaj-74d7dca8ce254e4faef0cac5b3684e462020-11-25T03:02:16ZengMDPI AGAlgorithms1999-48932020-02-011335310.3390/a13030053a13030053Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flowAndreas Strand0Ivar Eskerud Smith1Tor Erling Unander2Ingelin Steinsland3Leif Rune Hellevik4Department of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwaySINTEF Multiphase Flow Laboratory, 7491 Trondheim, NorwaySINTEF Multiphase Flow Laboratory, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Mathematical Sciences, Faculty of Information Technology and Electrical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayDepartment of Structural Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, 7491 Trondheim, NorwayUncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates.https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/13/3/53two-phase flowunit celluncertainty quantificationsensitivity analysismonte carlopolynomial chaos |
collection |
DOAJ |
language |
English |
format |
Article |
sources |
DOAJ |
author |
Andreas Strand Ivar Eskerud Smith Tor Erling Unander Ingelin Steinsland Leif Rune Hellevik |
spellingShingle |
Andreas Strand Ivar Eskerud Smith Tor Erling Unander Ingelin Steinsland Leif Rune Hellevik Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow Algorithms two-phase flow unit cell uncertainty quantification sensitivity analysis monte carlo polynomial chaos |
author_facet |
Andreas Strand Ivar Eskerud Smith Tor Erling Unander Ingelin Steinsland Leif Rune Hellevik |
author_sort |
Andreas Strand |
title |
Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
title_short |
Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
title_full |
Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
title_fullStr |
Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
title_full_unstemmed |
Uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
title_sort |
uncertainty propagation through a point model for steady-state two-phase pipe flow |
publisher |
MDPI AG |
series |
Algorithms |
issn |
1999-4893 |
publishDate |
2020-02-01 |
description |
Uncertainty propagation is used to quantify the uncertainty in model predictions in the presence of uncertain input variables. In this study, we analyze a steady-state point-model for two-phase gas-liquid flow. We present prediction intervals for holdup and pressure drop that are obtained from knowledge of the measurement error in the variables provided to the model. The analysis also uncovers which variables the predictions are most sensitive to. Sensitivity indices and prediction intervals are calculated by two different methods, Monte Carlo and polynomial chaos. The methods give similar prediction intervals, and they agree that the predictions are most sensitive to the pipe diameter and the liquid viscosity. However, the Monte Carlo simulations require fewer model evaluations and less computational time. The model predictions are also compared to experiments while accounting for uncertainty, and the holdup predictions are accurate, but there is bias in the pressure drop estimates. |
topic |
two-phase flow unit cell uncertainty quantification sensitivity analysis monte carlo polynomial chaos |
url |
https://www.mdpi.com/1999-4893/13/3/53 |
work_keys_str_mv |
AT andreasstrand uncertaintypropagationthroughapointmodelforsteadystatetwophasepipeflow AT ivareskerudsmith uncertaintypropagationthroughapointmodelforsteadystatetwophasepipeflow AT torerlingunander uncertaintypropagationthroughapointmodelforsteadystatetwophasepipeflow AT ingelinsteinsland uncertaintypropagationthroughapointmodelforsteadystatetwophasepipeflow AT leifrunehellevik uncertaintypropagationthroughapointmodelforsteadystatetwophasepipeflow |
_version_ |
1724690508681314304 |