UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA

Through international collaboration we are at the start of a new age in the management of this enigmatic tumour. Tumours are now grouped at diagnosis using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Grouping (INRG), which uses information from tumour tissue reflecting tumour biology, as well as radiology...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roly Squire
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust 2016-08-01
Series:Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
Online Access:http://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/76
id doaj-750f5836018a4d09b0d7ca23c5054098
record_format Article
spelling doaj-750f5836018a4d09b0d7ca23c50540982021-10-02T18:55:33ZengShaukat Khanum Memorial TrustJournal of Cancer and Allied Specialties2411-989X2016-08-012210.37029/jcas.v2i2.76UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMARoly Squire0Paediatric Surgery Consultant Paediatric Surgeon, St James's Univeristy Hospital Consultant Paediatric Surgeon, Leeds General Infirmary Through international collaboration we are at the start of a new age in the management of this enigmatic tumour. Tumours are now grouped at diagnosis using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Grouping (INRG), which uses information from tumour tissue reflecting tumour biology, as well as radiology to define Image-defined risk factors (IDRF). Tumours in high risk groups receive maximal therapy in an attempt to try and improve outcomes which are still poor. Intermediate risk tumours, which have better outcomes due to better response to current therapy, are treated aggressively with combination therapies with proven therapeutic effects, but with increasing attention to the minimising adverse treatment effects. The treatment of low risk tumours is now vastly reduced, acknowledging the excellent outcome in these children using minimal therapy. It has become apparent that the consequences of therapy in these children can easily be worse than those from the tumour itself. For very low risk tumours trials are exploring the outcomes without any treatment. INRG allows more precise comparison of results between different international groups, and provides a template into which new prognostic variables can be introduced, and their value assessed. In many centres multi-array analysis is studying the genetic profile of each tumour; perhaps this will allow increasing individualisation of treatment programmes in the near future. Key words: Neuroblastoma, International Neuroblastoma Risk Grouping, Image defined risk factors.  http://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/76
collection DOAJ
language English
format Article
sources DOAJ
author Roly Squire
spellingShingle Roly Squire
UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
author_facet Roly Squire
author_sort Roly Squire
title UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
title_short UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
title_full UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
title_fullStr UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
title_full_unstemmed UPDATES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF NEUROBLASTOMA
title_sort updates in the management of neuroblastoma
publisher Shaukat Khanum Memorial Trust
series Journal of Cancer and Allied Specialties
issn 2411-989X
publishDate 2016-08-01
description Through international collaboration we are at the start of a new age in the management of this enigmatic tumour. Tumours are now grouped at diagnosis using the International Neuroblastoma Risk Grouping (INRG), which uses information from tumour tissue reflecting tumour biology, as well as radiology to define Image-defined risk factors (IDRF). Tumours in high risk groups receive maximal therapy in an attempt to try and improve outcomes which are still poor. Intermediate risk tumours, which have better outcomes due to better response to current therapy, are treated aggressively with combination therapies with proven therapeutic effects, but with increasing attention to the minimising adverse treatment effects. The treatment of low risk tumours is now vastly reduced, acknowledging the excellent outcome in these children using minimal therapy. It has become apparent that the consequences of therapy in these children can easily be worse than those from the tumour itself. For very low risk tumours trials are exploring the outcomes without any treatment. INRG allows more precise comparison of results between different international groups, and provides a template into which new prognostic variables can be introduced, and their value assessed. In many centres multi-array analysis is studying the genetic profile of each tumour; perhaps this will allow increasing individualisation of treatment programmes in the near future. Key words: Neuroblastoma, International Neuroblastoma Risk Grouping, Image defined risk factors. 
url http://journals.sfu.ca/jcas/index.php/jcas/article/view/76
work_keys_str_mv AT rolysquire updatesinthemanagementofneuroblastoma
_version_ 1716848500397834240